Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[NRamaswami]

Hanon

I beg to disagree.When I started posting my results you wanted a simple device people can build at low cost. Unfortunately a device that outputs 300 amps in secondary of an Electromagnetic core must carry wire has to be a huge coil. The reported voltage is around 68 volts. Now condifder how many turns of that coil should be made to reach the voltage.Also calculate the size of the core that can provide the magnetic field to produce such an amperage. The size of iron core becomes obvious.If a device can be commonly used it must have safty features and should not cause health hazards.High frequency current does not cause injuries and is dangerous only if the wires come in contact with water. Figuera must have used 6 to 8 inch dia cores or more to get the reported amperage.And voltage.  I am only using a call rated to be safe at 120 amps and I do not expect to reach more than 60 volts and probably 40 ampps now. I will need to add more modules to get about 220 volts when I may be able to hit 120 amps for a total estimated input of 1000 watts.
For the reason of health envitonment we may have to put the device underground and run tesys for more than a month of continued operations. The rotary device G makes it impossible for the generator to work for long time.  It is bound to fail within a week or a month of continued operations. We have checked with high power carbon brushes but they also wear out.We have seen that many inconsistencies between the statement in the patent and our observations. We are not going to change the parts of a generator once in a week and make new connections again and again.
Principle is correct but some statements made in the patent are contrary to facts.
I have to admit that I have to meet several goal posts.
Safety of operations.
No health hazard
No risk of magnetic leakage of radiation
No excessive heat.
Sustainability of operation
A minimum of one or two months of maintenace free operation.
These are the goals now. If you want me to show less in

put and more outputand sustained operations I can do it now but the ririsks are not yet covered.

The entire thing may have to be placed underground to test all thisand to be accepted as safe.

If I have to use pulsed dc as it appears now I will need to use single coil.

But.please go back and look at your own posts to see that the patent does not disclose any thing concrete about the device even the polarity of the poles.

So I only look at the principle.

If you feel that I am straying away I will stop posting and happilly file a patent yo get funds to do the research. It is very difgicult to continue.

[Doug1]

Hannon

Did Patrick spell your name wrong? lol

[gyvulys666]

some thoughts about hanon last pic which shows two columns of oposing electromagnets.
why we dont use south poles just north ones? using both poles could give 2x output theoreticaly
columns coult be blaced in a line or in circle config

[Doug1]

Posted a few pages back
"PRINCIPLE OF THE INVENTION

"Watching closely what happens in a Dynamo in motion."

 

[Doug1]

When the brush rotate around in contact with two or more bars. Are bars larger then wires? How long does it take to wear out bars? Even a motor commutator uses something more like bars then wires for the contact surface for the brush. Changing a brush out isnt that hard. How long do motors run with brushes? I'll bet it is longer then a month. Im not gonna say it is 10 years but it is way more then a month. thats without even getting into the better type brushes which are made to take a beating on really beefy motors. All that also excludes the notion of a wheel which will last even longer then a brush.