Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Started by bajac, October 07, 2012, 06:21:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 22 Guests are viewing this topic.

wistiti


hanon

Hi wistiti,
I think it is a good revision because now it collects the polarity in repulsion North-North, and I think this is an essential part of the device.

I miss the 1908 patent text which was already incluided in the previous version. Also I miss a reference to a current regulator composed by resistors, that it is the one explained in the patent claims. Resistor are easier to understand for newcomers than the magnetic reluctance rheostat, which maybe is an optimization but it is more difficult to understand at first sight. For me the essential key is to swing back and forth the two magnetic fields. The method to do it (resistors, rheostat, capacitor, magnetic amplifier,...) is secondary. There are many possible implementation to get the same result.

norman6538

Hanon I made the circuit you refered to below but did not get the same wave forms on
a scope. I got the DC humps up but not down....Did you have any success with
this circuit?  Did anybody else make the circuit??? any results??

Norman

Hanon said abour march 10 or so...
Yesterday I was testing the circuit posted by Ignacio on the 26th of february to use half wave in each inducer by rectifying AC with two diodes, post #3185 http://overunity.com/12794/re-inventing-the-wheel-part1-clemente_figuera-the-infinite-energy-machine/msg475611/#msg475611 and frankly the shape of each of the two signals is quite good. Minimun current of 0.2 A and maximum current about 2A with 12 volt AC input. I used a resistor joining both diodes outlet in order to assure a minimun current,as base current, during all time.

I attach the pic with one signal. The other signal you may guess it unphased 180°. I post to show it because it is an easy way to implement the input signals. Maybe other people could also use it. Really simple.

Still testing this new driving circuit. So far no important results to share. Output was small but a very good AC shape at 50 Hz.

wistiti

Quote from: hanon on April 02, 2016, 07:39:21 PM
Hi wistiti,
I think it is a good revision because now it collects the polarity in repulsion North-North, and I think this is an essential part of the device.

I miss the 1908 patent text which was already incluided in the previous version. Also I miss a reference to a current regulator composed by resistors, that it is the one explained in the patent claims. Resistor are easier to understand for newcomers than the magnetic reluctance rheostat, which maybe is an optimization but it is more difficult to understand at first sight. For me the essential key is to swing back and forth the two magnetic fields. The method to do it (resistors, rheostat, capacitor, magnetic amplifier,...) is secondary. There are many possible implementation to get the same result.

Thank you for the reply!
Yep again the same concept "bucking feild" as Chris Emjunky try to tell to everyone...
Thank again! You do a great job!

wistiti

Quote from: wistiti on April 02, 2016, 07:09:43 PM
Hi hanon what do you think of the last update of the pjkbook?
http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk/Chapter3.pdf
Look at page 24...

I wonder if it is better to have a core for each coil with a small gap betwin the coil or one unique core for the set of 3 coils...???  Have you a input on this?