Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Started by bajac, October 07, 2012, 06:21:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 91 Guests are viewing this topic.

marathonman

I agree. what if Mr Figueras drew his invention for simplicity like most patents do. instead of winding the coils on separate cores for visualization purposes, what if it was wound on one core alternating NS Y SN winding layers.( NS Y SN Y NS Y SN ect.) then tying the out puts together and varying the current to NS SN coil layers. this would cause the required magnetic rotation needed for proper AC output in the Y coil Please watch this Video to visualize what i am talking about. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awrUxv7B-a8
please ignore the subject and rotor and pay attention to the rotating magnetic flux fields. this is what is taking place in Figueras invention and i am darn near convinced i am right on this one....please advise ! .........this would cause the magnetic rotation in the wires and the iron core will significantly magnify this event. he then series and or paralleled the outputs to required voltages and Ampers. with the NS Y SN coils being so close in proximity and magnetically coupled together the Lorentz effect would be eliminated as the Lorentz effect is only applicable to same like charges ie..NN or SS...++ or --.   yes it could be possible for the Y coil to be sanwiched in between to pick up bloch wall events. things that make you go Hmmmmmm.

dieter

Thanks, I double that hmmmm. Ive made a diagram to illlustrate how dramaticly  and effectively field lines can be compressed by the bloch wall. The lorentz force will act on the pancake, so it must me fixed well. Iron core may cause eddy current losses, so I said ferrite. A magnet field monitor foil from wondermagnets.com makes finding the bloch wall easy.

Also, permanent magnets probably may be used to setup the basic bloch wall, and only an additional emagnetfield is applied to do the oscillation.

NRamaswami

Dear All:

I have a doubt. It is a basic and fundamental theoretical doubt. Could any one of the friends here clarify on this point please. I would be very obliged.

Now I have a doubt.

The induced emf in secondary called counter emf or voltage is based on the following factors as I know.

1. Number of turns of the secondary.
2. Rate of change of mangetic flux or frequency
3. Length vs Diameter ratio
4. Core material used as it determines magnetic permeability.

There is another variable present here. Magnetic Field Strength.

Now The magnetic field strength is based on the Number of turns multiplied by the amperage applied. If we increase one or both of them the intensity of the magnetic field or the magnetic field strength would increase.

My doubt is very specific..

What is the effect of the intensity of the magnetic field or what is the effect of increasing the amperage on the solenoid..Would it increase the induced emf or would it reduce the emf.

Please consider that in both the situations the applied current is either AC or pulsed DC. As is known the impedance of the wire carrying current is reduced when the current is pulsed DC.

So how would the intensity of the magnetic field strength would affect the induced emf in both these cases. I checked all material online and am unable to find answers. Could you please answer this please? I would be obliged.

Ramaswami

marathonman

Good Point i'll have to get back to you on that one, but i do know that if the magnetic field is increased ( i.e Currant or Ampur turns) to much it has a decreasing effect in relation to the efield which we don't want to happen. the rest i will get back. i have a drawing that could help....very bad attempt at paint though. Dieter i though the bloch wall is only relevant to North and South poles.

hanon

Hi Ramaswami,

In a solenoid the magnetic field B  maybe calculated from B = nu·N·I/Length . Therefore the intensity and the turns determine the final magnetic field.

As Faraday Law  the induce emf depends on the rate of change of the magnetic field, dB/dt: it is the sames going form 100 to 80 than going from 30 to 10, because in both case the variation is 20 units.

For flux linking two coils:    Faraday Law:            emf = N·Area·dB/dt   

then emf = N·Area·nu·(I_max - I_min)/Time  , therefore the higher the jump beetween Imax and Imin and the higher the frequency (1/Time) then the emf will be greater

For flux cutting a moving wire at certain speed the formula is the Lorentz Force     emf = B·Length·Speed

I haven´t read the last post I have just arrived home. I will read them after dinner