9/11 truth movement topic

[Elvis Oswald]

The first time is when he say's... that the fire dept commander said... THEY

That's hearsay
haha

and he was "quoting" the FDC.

so HE didn't say THEY

then - he only say's it one more time.  Where do you hear the other one?

There's no evidence to link the two THEYs

There is a UH to link PULL and PULL IT

So he did mean PULL IT

and PULL IT means to PULL a building down.

Where did you get "pull it away with cables"?

PULL IT means pull the building down with explosives

[madsen]

The first time is when he say's... that the fire dept commander said... THEY

That's hearsay
haha

and he was "quoting" the FDC.

so HE didn't say THEY

then - he only say's it one more time.  Where do you hear the other one?

There's no evidence to link the two THEYs

There is a UH to link PULL and PULL IT

So he did mean PULL IT

and PULL IT means to PULL a building down.

Where did you get "pull it away with cables"?

PULL IT means pull the building down with explosives

Here are the three times that I'm counting: 

"I remember getting a call from the fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse."

I don't see any reason to assume the "they"s refer to different things/people. 

The quote concerning the cables is on this page: 

http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm 

about 1/10 of the way down.  It's easy to find the quote if you just search the page for the word cables.

[Elvis Oswald]

yep.  not every day you try and pull down a building using cables.  You usually use explosives. 

That's what he said.  And that's what he meant.  They pulled down building 6 with cables.

Your 'source' left off the end of the video - plainly seen at the link I posted - where they pulled the building down with cables.

So this proves that:

#1 - your 'source' is lying by omission.

#2 - "pull it" is a term in used by demolition professionals to mean - PULL DOWN A BUILDING (which is the very thing you were trying to prove false - thank you very much)

#3 - "pull it" is not a term used by demolition professionals to mean - pull a building away from another one during demolition.

That website stated the 'fact' and then showed you half the video evidence and you latched onto the 'fact' and you have defended it here until waaay too late.

You have been misled on this point.  IMHO, it was on purpose.

What do you think?

[Pirate88179]

I believe the term "pull it" in this context refers to "the plug" as in pull the plug on the entire rescue mission, and get the people out. (their people)

Otherwise, this does not make sense.  Why would the fire department, if they were supposedly in on it, blow the building with their men inside?  To make it look better?  I don't think so.  A jury would never buy this evidence. (In my opinion, sometimes, juries will buy anything)

At least you guys are looking at it in detail.  Also, buildings that size would have taken over a month to plant demo devices for a professional job, and that is only if they had a large crew and TOTAL access to all the buildings 24/7 during that time.  Just not possible.  I think folks would have noticed 55 gallon blue plastic drums of explosives strapped to all of the main supports on all floors, not to mention the miles and miles of det cord connecting them all together.  This is not even plausible.

Bill

[madsen]

yep.  not every day you try and pull down a building using cables.  You usually use explosives. 

That's what he said.  And that's what he meant.  They pulled down building 6 with cables.

Your 'source' left off the end of the video - plainly seen at the link I posted - where they pulled the building down with cables.

So this proves that:

#1 - your 'source' is lying by omission.

#2 - "pull it" is a term in used by demolition professionals to mean - PULL DOWN A BUILDING (which is the very thing you were trying to prove false - thank you very much)

#3 - "pull it" is not a term used by demolition professionals to mean - pull a building away from another one during demolition.

That website stated the 'fact' and then showed you half the video evidence and you latched onto the 'fact' and you have defended it here until waaay too late.

You have been misled on this point.  IMHO, it was on purpose.

What do you think?

What?  I agree that they used cables to pull down WTC6.

Anyway, my understanding was the use of cables was the critical issue here---if you use cables to pull on the building in the process, you are "pulling".  I admit that I don't have any experience in this area though.  Have you done demolition before?


ETA:  Regardless of where this debate over pulling ends up, Pirate88179 wins the thread.