Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Self accelerating reed switch magnet spinner.

Started by synchro1, September 30, 2013, 01:47:45 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

TinselKoala

Quote from: synchro1 on January 04, 2014, 11:40:47 AM
@Milehigh,

Have a look at this video on the "Macroscopic Aharonov-Bohm effect":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ugxmtT4FUME


This relates to the "Vector A potential" of Dr. Richard Feynman; The vector A potential is not confined to the magnet core, and is located along the axis of symmetry in the toroid schematic below!


Conradelectro sadly failed to harness this charging effect because he overwound his "Synchro coil".

This video does not show what it says it is showing. Both parts are simply wrong, they are misinterpretations of what is actually happening.

A "Bloch wall" has no more reality than isobars on a weather map. All magnetic field lines are closed loops.
This is the physical meaning of "div B = 0". To claim a "frequency" of a "Bloch wall" sounds like nonsense to me. Cut a bar magnet in half at the "Bloch wall" with a hacksaw and what do you get: you get two, smaller, bar magnets and now "suddenly" you have two "Bloch walls", one in the center of each of your new short bar magnets. Pretty strange behaviour for something that you think is "real" and has a "frequency".

conradelektro

Quote from: MileHigh on January 04, 2014, 04:57:58 PM
Conrad:

That's a nice looking first setup.  I hope that you have fun with the DC motor and look forward to seeing what kinds of tests you end up doing.

MileHigh

@MileHigh: My intention is to test for differences between bi-filar and mono-filar coils with the same physical size and the same number of turns of identical wire (same wire length).

For such tests I need a "test bed" which allows to spin a diametrically magnetized magnet (as a rotor) with a predefined speed (rpm) to test for differences in "picking up electricity" as in a dynamo and to test for differences in "Lenz drag".

Now I have two such "test beds", a puls motor (which should react very well to "Lenz drag") and the set up with the 12V DC motor (which should provide a constant rpm even under some drag).

There are of course other measurements to do, like impedance, self resonance, phase angle, parasitic capacitance. I read so many fantastic stories and claims about bifilar coils, I want to see myself , if there is anything to it.

Since synchro1 made such outrageous claims about his "synchro coil", I tested a replication of such a "synchro coil". And it does not show any interesting effects. Therefore all further tests with a "synchro coil" are not very pressing for me and will be done as an unimportant "side show".

Once I have wound a set of "coils to be tested" I will create a new thread for discussion. I also want to make the "magnet spinner with the 12 DC motor" a bit better (a better coupling between the 12 V DC motor with the spinner axis).

In the meantime this crazy thread will do. Nobody is in a hurry besides synchro1. He can do his own tests in case he needs them urgently. I am not his tester. I test what interests me at my own slow speed. And I am always grateful for ideas and suggestions, as long as they are not too crazy and too insulting.

Synchro1 has clearly overstepped my tolerance. I have not made any claims, I even admit that my tests are not disproving the "synchro coil" in any general way (negative proof is never possible; one can only prove that "something is", never that "something is not"). My tests of a "replication of the synchro coil" show nothing special, that is the only result. One can draw conclusions, but not more. May be synchro1 can build one that is special. But it is up to him.

Greetings, Conrad

synchro1

@MH, TK & CE,


I'm amused by you three stodgy cynics; To imagine a magnetic field is solid and not dynamic is utterly ludicrous to me. I tested the "Cook Effect" thousands of times, spoken about it constantly on the web site. A grade school kid could get the test to work.  Conradelectro says his experiment's on the "backburner" because I'm crazy. The Schumman constant turns out to be imaginary; We have Magnetic resonance imaging in medicine and recently I saw a bifilar pancake wireless energy receiver in a Samsung cell phone that's the highest state of the art, charging the phone off Wi-Fi signals at the airport, and Conradelectro's building some paleolithic "flintstone" contraption to demystify the coil. The three of you guys are just a set of inveterate "Cranks", and you all just "Chickened out" on my hot plate bet while all the time going on with endless reams of rubbish. I started this thread and I want you creeps to stay on topic.      

conradelektro

I did another test with the synchro coil. It is about the claim that the "synchro coil" charges up a capacitor by just sitting there.

Please see the attached photo and drawing which depicts the test.

I did the test also with a "normal coil". And I moved a strong magnet left and right (several times) in front of the coils which induces a small Voltage into the cap (up to 1 Volt if you do it fast and long enough) which dissipates soon through the Voltmeter. This is to prove that everything was connected correctly.

Measuring just 0 Volt is not very indicative. But showing that a coil produces electricity if a magnet is passed rapidly passed it, proves what is commonly known.

Of course, synchro1 will see a conspiracy, so be it. Sorry, I do not have a diode which can rectify Terahertz.

What did I show: in my house a "replication of the synchro coil" does not produce electricity by just sitting there. It behaves like a "normal coil" and only produces electricity if a magnet is moved passed it.

Quote from: synchro1 on January 05, 2014, 11:10:00 AM
Conradelectro says his experiment's on the "backburner" because I'm crazy.

I did not write that, but you speak the truth this time. You are either trying to be funny in a strange way or you have a serious mental condition.

Greetings, Conrad

synchro1

@Conradelektro,


Try one layer of wire on the magnet stack. There's a spin field outside the magnets, Dr. Richard Feynman calls it the A vector potential. He also says you have to give the coil a bit of thought to harness it. Daniel Mcfarland Cook used one layer of 32 gauage wire, and a second of 16. There's way too much wire on the coil. I pointed this out over and over. Try "A Little bit of thought"!