Bashar's Spacecraft Engine

[Uniqorn]

Regarding the rod cone, how do you know it needs to be an inch long? But it is sharp to touch.

Short answer, I don't know for sure, but with high voltage electrostatics, the sharper the point, the more concentrated the electrostatic field becomes, thus raising the local potential at the tip.
It is my presumption that this is why it needs to be sharp. This makes the tip more delicate, so if it can't contact the metal hemisphere, then it should at least be very close, say within no greater than a 1mm.

[Hope]

Would seem if you both touch the rod and just connect to the crystal's outer area with a slight indent then you would be shorting out something that the crystal might be acting upon (such as rectifying or shaping a signal).  Are you sure he does not mean that the Rod passing through the crystal should be touching the crystal at four points.  This would make sense,  as to connect the bi lateral areas above and two bi lateral areas below could allow for 4 wires to transfer THROUGH the crystal matrix and would make their own paths to the correct collection hemisphere.  In making their own paths I mean being attracted to the correct dome.  We need to think about what is going on and what we already know of in dealing with circuits similar to this.  He does compare it with man made objects already and we should be considering how those objects are similarly connected. 


Connecting the Rod in this way will, as well, give physical support to the crystal's mounting. 


And if you drill through the crystal you will circumvent the energies filtering.


http://www.nrgnair.com/MPT/zdi_tech/tesla/TACREG-1.htm

This crystal may be a filter that inhibits some effects we see now in spark gaps and enhancing others.  And he does hint at it of course being able to sense things we have not been sensing in other circuits.  This device could be a very sensitive magnetic circuit as well as a collector,  especially if it is used as a part of anti gravity drive.

[WTF]

@Hope

The rod touches the crystal at the full circumference of itself so touching 4 points of a round is not possible. I think that's what you mean.

@Uniquorn

Why do you think these wires should touch the rod when he doesn't say they should ever be in contact with it?

I can understand your reasoning when you say some of the wires go inside the crystal when he refers to "penetrating", maybe that could help resonate the crystal more as the wire would have more contact with the crystal, but that could mean a 10mm deep hole he doesn't say, so how do you come to your conclusion? Also when he says touching at 4 points he could mean only 4 of the wires touching the outside of the crystal.[/font]

The other thing to remember is the wire I use is 0.56mm so would need to drill 1mm hole in crystal, I don't know if you have ever drilled a 1mm hole before in anything, but if you have you will know that anything more than very light pressure will snap the bit. Contrary to what people say when drilling quartz, drilling with light pressure doesn't even scratch the surface, you need moderate pressure, so that kind of pressure could snap the drill bit, drilling with a bigger bit and the sides of the wire wouldn't be in contact with the crystal.

But personally because of what Bashar says here "Then at the outer boundary of the net, allow each wire to remain as a single wire, do not curve them back upon themselves, allow their ends to be exposed in the center of what you would call the sandwich."
I believe they are just exposed, because when he was answering that question he never said some of the wires go inside the crystal, but you also could be right about the wires going inside the crystal, but you will need to show be how you come to your conclusion about the wires touching the rod as I can't see that in the text.

Also with the wire net being in contact at all the cross points, this is not mentioned either way, so why do you think this must be done that way, what is your reasoning. Of course if you are correct I would need to make the wire net again, but first I would like to know why you think they should be in contact.


I am open to all suggestions and will try them but I would like to know why you suggest what you suggest.

My first clear crystal came but unfortunately it was 54mm even though it was stated that it was 50mm, so ordered 2 more from 2 different sources, hopefully one will be 50mm.

I won't try anything until I have fitted the clear crystal first, start with the easiest thing first.

[WTF]

@Hope

The rod touches the crystal at the full circumference of itself so touching 4 points of a round is not possible. I think that's what you mean.

@Uniquorn

Why do you think these wires should touch the rod when he doesn't say they should ever be in contact with it?

I can understand your reasoning when you say some of the wires go inside the crystal when he refers to "penetrating", maybe that could help resonate the crystal more as the wire would have more contact with the crystal, but that could mean a 10mm deep hole he doesn't say, so how do you come to your conclusion? Also when he says touching at 4 points he could mean only 4 of the wires touching the outside of the crystal.

The other thing to remember is the wire I use is 0.56mm so would need to drill 1mm hole in crystal, I don't know if you have ever drilled a 1mm hole before in anything, but if you have you will know that anything more than very light pressure will snap the bit. Contrary to what people say when drilling quartz, drilling with light pressure doesn't even scratch the surface, you need moderate pressure, so that kind of pressure could snap the drill bit, drilling with a bigger bit and the sides of the wire wouldn't be in contact with the crystal.

But personally because of what Bashar says here "Then at the outer boundary of the net, allow each wire to remain as a single wire, do not curve them back upon themselves, allow their ends to be exposed in the center of what you would call the sandwich."
I believe they are just exposed, because when he was answering that question he never said some of the wires go inside the crystal, but you also could be right about the wires going inside the crystal, but you will need to show be how you come to your conclusion about the wires touching the rod as I can't see that in the text.

Also with the wire net being in contact at all the cross points, this is not mentioned either way, so why do you think this must be done that way, what is your reasoning. Of course if you are correct I would need to make the wire net again, but first I would like to know why you think they should be in contact.


I am open to all suggestions and will try them but I would like to know why you suggest what you suggest.

My first clear crystal came but unfortunately it was 54mm even though it was stated that it was 50mm, so ordered 2 more from 2 different sources, hopefully one will be 50mm.

I won't try anything until I have fitted the clear crystal first, start with the easiest thing first.

[Hope]

I agree with you,  my point was to think a long time about how to organize your efforts to where you can do the least amount of drilling.  I did not think any wire was to go to the rod, only to the outer crystal.  What do you think is meant by "as one wire"?


And only a very high speed drill could do much boring at a low surface pressure.   I worked with a tool manufacture and very much agree with your statements on snapping the small drill bit.


So what do you also think about the 4 points of contact meant?  The wording seems vague to me. 
I would research the best way to do any work on that crystal before attempting changes to it if any.  And any materials you do remove please keep in case you need to create a crystal based adhesive. 


I like the drawings,  I would also create a flow chart from the statements and then use it to make an image to work from.  I have not done this step.  I applaud your fine work on the disks.