Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Telekinese forces proven...

Started by hartiberlin, August 17, 2006, 04:10:54 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Nadda

QuoteTo succeed at one of those challenges , you have to prove to them that it is real . Your words . Incorrect . If you had read the fine print you would know that you have to prove it to an independent adjudicator acceptable to both parties . You are wriggling like a fish on a hook . OK if you can do telekinesis , complete a simple test for me .Next Saturday night , in the UK lottery , simply manipulate the balls as they fall ,and win the lottery .That way you do not have to convince any awkward adjudicators . I will even let you keep all the prize money .I can not be fairer than that , can I?

Why would i need to "wriggle" lol? telekinesis is not a strong force and life is not an x-men movie. You simply dont understand how it works. So i will explain it. In the real world, unlike the movies, you cannot turn telekinesis on and turn it off. Once its on, it stays on. It affects all objects of the same weight. In my experience, objects will mimic what im thinking. I control the objects by focusing on my thoughts, and the objects follow along. You see, objects will follow along weather i realize they are or not. Someone could place a piece of paper on a needle behind me right now and it would instantly start spinning. I've done dozens of experiments and even recorded an object that continued to spin after i left the room. Imagine that, an object alone in a room with no air movement spinning back and forth. Furnace off, windows shut, door closed, no air flow. Yet the object moves. A static non biological object with no muscles no energy...all alone, moving. Its Amazing. I only discovered telekinesis was real four years ago. That recording i made was the only video i ever shot and it was two years ago.

QuoteYou say that the reason the prize has not been won is that "They don't want a winner ." I put it to you that the real reason it has not been won is that no one has demonstrated paranormal abilities.

Your wrong mate. Unfortunately im in a position of greater knowledge here than you are. The challenge has been at 1 million for 15 years, they've gotten so many applications that they have had to require preliminary proof before the challenge begins, I mean the application even has to be notarized lol. I could care less what you choose to believe, i know the truth, and i know millions of other people in the world can do what i can do. To say NONE of the over whelming numbers of applicants that applied were the real deal, especially after going through all that hoopla, has to be nonsense at best.

If i were wealthy i would fly you to a private setting and show you myself, unfortunately im not.

So in the end it doesnt matter to me what you believe, its sad to see someone close their mind when they have the exact same abilities, but none the less i gain nothing of any importance by spending my time convincing you on a forum. What would i gain by encouraging people to practice on their own spare time? What would i gain by spending my time on a forum lying? Its real weather you want to believe it or not. I dont expect you to understand. You havent seen what i have. Its up to you to change that.

fritznien



Nadda why don't you take your talent down to the casino and move the dice or the roulette ball.
keep your winnings under a 1000 bucks a day and you should escape notice.
fritznien

neptune

@Iota Yodi  and fritznien .LOL . @Wilby You say Randi spent his life hoaxing people . Indeed he did .He is after all a professional Conjurer . That does not change his other career as an exposer of hoaxes .
@Nadda .It has been said that extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof . I do not totally discount the remote possibility that you can do what you say . You say that if you were wealthy you could prove it to me .[I am tempted to say you could become wealthy by winning the James Randi Prize , but I think I may have mentioned that previously!] If I claimed to be the son of God , would you believe me ? Proof of anything can be extraordinarily difficult . There are always numerous ways to fake things , remember Mylow? But without proof , we stray into the realm of faith based systems , in other words religion . Religion is the cause of half the wars on earth , oil being the cause of the rest . You say that you can influence electronics . Make a simple circuit of just a coil of wire connected across a microamp meter or even an LED . See if you can cause a current to flow . And Yes I know of several ways to fake that . A final question .You have worked hard to develop your alleged ability . Exactly why did you want this ability? Also , please note that although I may not believe you ,It does not mean that I have anything against you as a person .

WilbyInebriated

@ neptune, indeed he did. and indeed his "challenge" is a continuation of the same... ::)

regarding your "extraordinary claims require extra ordinary evidence": this is one of the most hopelessly flawed statements ever uttered. carl sagan was a brilliant man, but this statement of his is ludicrous. the problem with this statement is that popular science does not require extraordinary evidence for its extraordinary claims. ie:the big bang theory may be the most extraordinary claim in the history of popular science. here we have an idea that can be neatly encapsulated in eight words: "at first, there was nothing...then it exploded." now how can NOTHING explode? big bang theory "defies gravity" and violates innumerable laws of physics, it remains a HYPOTHETICAL mathematical model, yet it is promoted as truth by NASA and institutions of higher learning around the world. why has the mainstream never demanded the same standards of big bang theorists that it does of "paranormal" proponents?

where are the "double-blind tests" validating big bang theory? has big bang theory been tested by the james randi "educational" foundation or other skeptical organizations?

to be more precise, you should say: UNPOPULAR claims require extraordinary evidence. and make no mistake, that is what randi's science is... popular science. ::)
There is no news. There's the truth of the signal. What I see. And, there's the puppet theater...
the Parliament jesters foist on the somnambulant public.  - Mr. Universe

triffid