Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

CANGAS 54

Unipolar nonsense.


" The similarity between cylindrical magnets and solenoids is examined, as well as the effect produced by one spinning magnet upon another."


That statement of something "new" is merely due to a lack of understanding of the field geometry IN a magnet being nearly identical to any conventional solenoid.

(SEE PIC BELOW)-----



Every 360 degrees of a single cycle of the turn of a magnet you have:
2 Ether-field modalities: dielectricity and magnetism (of course).
6 total pressure domain fluctuations, 2 centripetal, 2 centrifugal, and 2 dielectric
and.....10 field-boundary gradients



Faraday was the originator of the concept of =the magnetic field, (which is described in terms of "magnetic curves" our present day "magnetic lines of force") however HE NEVER SO MUCH AS SUGGESTED in his works that induced currents were a resultant of changing magnetic fields. ON THE CONTRARY, he clearly associated the phenomena of electromagnetic induction with changing electrical currents.

As per Maxwell, he TOO considered EM induction as a phenomena in which a current (or EM force) is induced in a circuit. but not as a phenomena in which a changing magnetic field causes an electrical field. He CLEARLY said tha the induced EM force is "MEASURED BY, not CAUSED BY the changing mag field"  

Just as Faraday, he made NO allusion to ANY CAUSAL link between magnetic and electric fields


----- Dr. Oleg D. Jefimenko

BOOK :   CAUSALITY, ELECTROMAGNETIC INDUCTION AND GRAVITATION




The below picture, to which you allude is only a backwards method of a TOTAL lack of understanding from Faraday that ANY "magnet" is a dominant dielectric device with a specific magneto-dielectric geometry.     

Hes saying the same thing I am, in a slightly diff. way.

[MileHigh]

Here's a fun clip:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMhwddNQSWQ

[TheoriaApophasis]

Here's a fun clip

Heres another picture, ..but its not a vortex


Oh wait, yes it is.    

[MileHigh]

When the electron bean encounters the static toroidal magnetic field it is induced along some sort of curved path.  For every angle the beam is currently at, a unique curved deflection path is taken.  Two beams that are very close in angle to each other will take similar, but not necessarily the same relative deflection paths.  There can be a spread, a.k.a. divergence, in the paths.  If you can envision a matrix of separate beams in a horizontal and vertical grid, then as the "matrix of beams" travels through the toroidal magnetic field, the many divergent but similar beam paths can form a "twist"

So the crux of the matter is that the static magnetic field is making the overall form of the electron beam raster scan twist before it strikes the phosphors.  But Theoria is seemingly incapable of visualizing or understanding this.  He sees the effects of magnetic fields causing circular motion and incorrectly believes that the magnetic field itself is in some kind of circular motion.  Magnetic fields form closed loops but that doesn't mean that they are in some kind of vortex or circular motion.  It's nothing more than an abject failure to understand that is at the root of this bizarre proposition.

Likewise, Theoria is unable to explain why there is a black circular void with a bright white spot at the center that is shown in several of his clips.  Instead, he tries to point to another example that does not show a circular void and claims "victory."  The embarrassed fanboys say nothing because their brains are wired to believe in the underdog no mater what.  Hey, Magnacoaster might ship one day.  If Theoria knows what he is talking about he should be able to explain the circular voids.  I can explain them.

It's like a Monty Python skit sometimes when a very colorful character shows up.  But the real thing is to try to visualize what is really going on by applying your knowledge about how a charged particle will be deflected into a circular type of path when it travels through a magnetic field. You have to take that knowledge and apply it to what you are observing in your experiments and arrive at the right conclusion through understanding and logical deduction.  That's the real deal when you strip it down to the bare bones.

MileHigh

[TheoriaApophasis]

.  There can be a spread, a.k.a. divergence, in the paths.

Wonderful "off the cuff" speculation ....and like an old man with a vasectomy, you're "shooting blanks" , intellectually.

We arent on CRT anymore, but onto 8 other methods of showing magnetic vortex.

In case you didnt notice, those TEST TUBES pics above dont have jack to do with CRT tubes.


You amuse me, like a monkey I once saw in India, it was scratching its ass looking for fleas.



Keep trying to convince yourself.

Theoria is unable to explain why there is a black circular void with a bright white spot at the center that is shown in several of his clips.

I explained it perfectly, ....that you DONT ACCEPT the answer, is not the same as  "DIDN'T answer".


Strawman fallacy my little son.