Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[EMJunkie]

@Enjoykin:

Who do you think was the first person to mention Gennady Nikolayev on this forum... years ago before his books were available in English? I'll give you one guess.

Hahahaha - Its because you're AMAZING TK!!!

[MileHigh]

That was a big one - if you don't know how to use your scope coupling after five years..... Tienes muchas problemas.

You need to work on your "nerd street cred."

[EMJunkie]

That was a big one - if you don't know how to use your scope coupling after five years..... Tienes muchas problemas.

You need to work on your "nerd street cred."

MileHigh - Тролли и Злодеи

[EMJunkie]

You have "given" exactly nothing, besides lots of misdirection, fake theory interpretations and unsupported claims of unusual performance... which you refuse to substantiate--- because you _cannot_ substantiate your claims with data from properly performed measurements. You have gone "dark" out of embarrassment due to your display of your own ignorance about the use of your own equipment and your inability to provide data which incontrovertibly supports your claims. But apparently your Top Secret Open Source group isn't providing you with what you need to gratify your ego, so here you are again with your insults, misdirections, irrelevancies, paranoia and more false claims.

To All,

I repeat, because it is important:

It is so simple:

*************************************************************************************************************************


Induction = dPhi/dt
Lenz Law = -dPhi/dt


What does 2 x -dPhi/dt equal?

Not (-) anything does it!!! 

WhaLa - Like Magic - Lenz's Law is gone.

*************************************************************************************************************************


Again Floyd Sweet: (Think Superposition)

If the directions of the two signals are such that opposite H-fields cancel and E-fields add, an apparently steady E-field will be created. The energy density of the fields
remain as calculated above, but the value of the E-field will double from E/2 to E.

So, the question begs, is NOTHING really something? Of course it is. Nothing = Magnetic Field ((-) Lenz Law x 2) = 1 or E/2 changes to E.

Simplified: 2 x -1 = 1

Why 2? Because there needs to be 2 output Coils, or  "Partnered Output Coils"!!!

Once you are able to think clearly about this, see the Light, you will! You will see how basic this is!

So, have I given anything, Yes I have, can you see it, no you cant, can you conceptualise it, no, not yet, will you be able to? This is up to you!

P.S: My initial Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJsVSMQqCOM

[MarkE]

@Mark E

I wasn't actually attacking science nor do I expressly disagree with it as you seem to be implying... I do however have issue with others interpretation of it. I would also agree many have made invalid claims and many might continue to do so however this in no way implies this will always be the case.


Did you read and understand the exponential growth of knowledge?. As we speak knowledge is effectively doubling on an annual basis however according to the graph curve very soon it will double every six months. Now what do you believe this means Mark?, to me it means we will gain new knowledge leading to new understanding and we should be clear we are not speaking of what is known at present but new knowledge. At which point we might ask the question, if this is really new knowledge then can it co-exist with what we consider old knowledge?.

Growth does not imply recission.  The very reason that we have accelerated our learning is the strength of the foundational knowledge that we have developed.

You are trying to argue that nothing can change and yet everyone here knows intuitively that it must and in fact it will with or without our consent. The fact remains that everything is changing in one way or another and to presume the future must be dictated by the past is a misguided venture in my opinion. We will learn, we will understand and we will move forward... that's the way it is Mark.

Kindly spare me straw man arguments.  I said and argued no such thing.

I find the contrast in perspectives fascinating, you are trying to argue Faraday and lenz Law are irrefutable to a person who saw a craft accelerate to astronomical speeds in seconds and leave Earth's obit. As such I have seen the future first hand and I'm not so sure it has room for people stuck in the past. The future is coming and it is simply a matter of time.

I argue for what verifiable facts show.  Where do you have verifiable facts that defy either Faraday or Lenz?  That's quite a trick seeing anything that isn't huge leave earths orbit.  Please tell me how you think that you managed to do that?

AC