Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[Void]

Hi Void,  Exactly. I do not state any OU , yet And as you know I do not accept any Lights as a measure of OU. Even measurements can be tricked. The only and best way to prove OU  is to have it as self runner.
Good luck

For sure John. Keep at it. 
All the best...

[EMJunkie]

@ALL,

Are you guys happy that you have an understanding of what's going on in the coils?

Can you see that this device a Valve of sorts?

A Magnetic Gate?

Kind Regards

   Chris Sykes - hyiq.org
   To Reach New Horizons!

[John.K1]

EMJunkie, to be honnest - 50-50
If that device would work also as Air core  I would say- I do understand. But, because it is not working for me, it means there must be some gap in my understanding.
Back to my Air core bucked coil tube. Thinking about it now, it is like two Tesla coils facing against each other and connected together at the bottoms and at the top. Sure winding is in opposite way.  My HV probe doesn't show HV on neither end of the bucked coil, just in the middle(strongest electric field). And my LED probe (small coil with LED) has highest intensity at the bottom and top (strongest magnetic field) and especially inside of the tube. The  continuos flow of current in the bucket coil has large impact on the intensity of my LED probe. When closed loop (shorted with resisitive load) the intensity of light (magnetic field)is High.  So my understanding of the fields structure around the device  from the bottom is   Amps - HV - Amps?

[synchro1]

one humble note: I forgot to say that same results at Amp draw using a 20W- 300K resistor as a load (and even shorted) . . .sorry

TK: I have been in this forum for some years now, learning and posting my failures and successes, and I know (and value) the high level of your knowledge and therefore, I can detect when you spread that acid sense of humor of yours, so. . . no offense here ! (I have never insulted anyone in this or other forums)

But,  I will be very much more grateful, if you would change your mood and switch on a more cooperative one.  With your building skills and measuring expertise, it would be a great help !!
Knowing about your honesty, I guess you have already replicated this simple device, and made your accurate measurements and scope shots, so please, be kind of posting such results and analysis. Thanks

Alvaro

TK'S perhaps waiting for a "New Moon" to prowl the back alleys for building parts under cover of darkness.

[conradelektro]

I prepared a coil former for "partnered output coils" (not yet wound), see the attached photo and specification.


I intend to wind the partnered output coils like this:

- 0.25 mm diameter enamelled wired (~ 30 AWG)

- each partnered coil has 5 layers, each 65 turns --> ~330 turns + ~330 turns

- the input coil is wound over one partnered coil, 2 layers, each 65 turns -->  ~120 turns


I could also wind like this:

- 0.25 mm diameter enamelled wired (~ 30 AWG)

- each partnered coil has 3 layers, each 65 turns --> ~195 turns + ~195 turns

- the input coil is wound over one partnered coil, 1 layer,  65 turns -->  ~65 turns


The winding principle will be as indicated by EMJunkie (see e.g. the picture in this post
http://overunity.com/15395/partnered-output-coils-free-energy/msg434472/#msg434472 )

The coupling can be modified by creating a gap between the core halves (e.g. by putting paper layers between them).


@EMJunkie: if you have time, please comment. Does this coil make sense?

Greetings, Conrad