Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[EMJunkie]

Well it dose show that the magnetic field is not contained within the toroid core as most believe.
If the field was contained within the core of a toroid,then there would be no inductive coupling to a secondary winding-->and yet the toroid core transformer is the most efficient we have. 

Hi Tinman,

Well, youre quite right, normally a Toroid, if wound properly, will have no Magnetic Field detectable, or at least very little Magnetic Field Detectable outside the Core...

Going back to the old days...

Leakage Inductance of the "Partnered Coils"!!! Leakage Inductance is the Requirement!!!

I also call "Leakage Inductance", Loose Coupling...

It seems, but not always, to be important. The only reason I can find to explain this is that it also Invokes emf = Bvl (Induction through Flux Cutting) and also emf dPhi/dt (Induction through Flux Linking).

Note: emf = dPhi/dt is Induction from the Induced Movement of the Magnetic A Vector Potential, normally around 95 - 97% or so efficient...

If one starts to imagine the Shape of the what a Coil in a Transformer might be subjected to, it might be something like the following:

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[EMJunkie]

It's really too bad you are so full of misinformation that you can't even allow comments on your video, which makes the FALSE CLAIM that you are showing a "rotating" magnetic field, when all you are _actually_ showing is alternating polarities of a magnetic field, which are timed such as to make your compass needle rotate.... just as I have shown here in this video made in January of 2013.... at least nine months BEFORE your video was posted in October 2013.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wd5w8KhYrQk

TK,

"when all you are _actually_ showing is alternating polarities of a magnetic field" - You contradict yourself with your very own words... No but yes...

Each Domain in the Iron Boron Metglass Core is represented at the point where the Compass is shown as its opposite polarity. The Domain is Rotating, and thus there is a Rotating Magnetic Field.

If you choose to disagree with me then that's fine, I have no wish to convince you otherwise!!! Sorry, I just don't have any time for Non-Sense!!!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[EMJunkie]

Nope, that's not quite correct. The changing current in the primary coil causes the magnetic field contained in the toroid to vary in strength and direction. Why would you think this would not produce inductive coupling to a secondary coil... since it obviously does? And not by flux leakage either... which is how Syke's demonstration is working.

Nope, that's not quite correct either. The Sinusoidal Current in the Primary Coil is seen as a Changing Magnetic Field that would mostly be contained in the toroid (approximately 99% if the Toroid is wound correctly) to vary in strength and direction. Which does Induce Inductive Coupling in one of the Secondary Coil's... The other Secondary Opposes the Magnetic Field of the First. Which does actually encourage Magnetic Flux Leakage as is very clearly seen by the action of the Compass in the Video.

TK, you have a real lack of real world knowledge in Magnetics! Best you brush up and get things correct... It makes you look silly...

Thinking you might know something and actually really knowing can be very different!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[Pirate88179]

Sorry, I just don't have any time for Non-Sense!!!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

Really?  But that is all you have been posting.  So evidently you do have time for nonsense...a lot of time it seems.  Just because you misunderstand an observed behavior please do not expect others that know better to agree with you.  They won't.  Why not post a real test of your claimed overunity circuits making overunity?  You also cliamed that hundreds of others are making overunity using your circuits...surely at least one of them has made a video of this fantastic achievement...right?  Why not post it as proof?

We will wait...

Bill

[EMJunkie]

Really?  But that is all you have been posting.  So evidently you do have time for nonsense...a lot of time it seems.  Just because you misunderstand an observed behavior please do not expect others that know better to agree with you.  They won't.  Why not post a real test of your claimed overunity circuits making overunity?  You also cliamed that hundreds of others are making overunity using your circuits...surely at least one of them has made a video of this fantastic achievement...right?  Why not post it as proof?

We will wait...

Bill

Hahaha - Bill, your mentality is Classically Dufus Logic...

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org