Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Is Newton's Law At Risk?

Started by gravityblock, April 11, 2015, 09:50:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Is Newton's third law at risk?

Yes, there's a violation of Newton's law in this case!
No, Newton's law is in full effect in this case!
Not sure, I'm undecided ar the moment!

gravityblock

One could add an additional generator to the left of the motor with a properly orientated one way bearing to capture both the forward and reverse motions without any appearant counter torque.  The left generator can capture the forward motion and the right generator can capture the reverse motion.


Nobody has tried to debunk this yet,....hmmm.....interesting!


Gravock
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting a different result.

God will confuse the wise with the simplest things of this world.  He will catch the wise in their own craftiness.

telecom

I think Vince on this forum built similar machine.

gravityblock

Quote from: telecom on April 13, 2015, 11:30:08 PM
I think Vince on this forum built similar machine.

I don't think you correctly understand the basic working principles and concepts of whoopy's replication.  The motor isn't inducing the net torque on the flywheel.  The net torque on the flywheel is induced by the inertia of the unbalanced gears!

Please study the motionless axis (#6 in the below image and the snapshot in the video by Whoopy).  The unbalanced gears induces an oscillation, and the oscillations causes the motionless axis to oscillate the pulley which it sits on, transferring a net torque to the flywheel via the rope.  The rope/string has no net movement itself, and this is a clear indication that there is no counter torque on the prime mover or motor, thus a violation of Newton's third law.

This is an inertial drive!  Please show me a working inertial drive built on this forum which is similar to the machine found in the video of the OP.

Gravock
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting a different result.

God will confuse the wise with the simplest things of this world.  He will catch the wise in their own craftiness.

telecom

Quote from: gravityblock on April 14, 2015, 03:19:00 AM
I don't think you correctly understand the basic working principles and concepts of whoopy's replication.  The motor isn't inducing the net torque on the flywheel.  The net torque on the flywheel is induced by the inertia of the unbalanced gears!

Please study the motionless axis (#6 in the below image and the snapshot in the video by Whoopy).  The unbalanced gears induces an oscillation, and the oscillations causes the motionless axis to oscillate the pulley which it sits on, transferring a net torque to the flywheel via the rope.  The rope/string has no net movement itself, and this is a clear indication that there is no counter torque on the prime mover or motor, thus a violation of Newton's third law.

This is an inertial drive!  Please show me a working inertial drive built on this forum which is similar to the machine found in the video of the OP.

Gravock
This sounds interesting - I didn't have the time yet to study  papers you referred to.
Regards

Low-Q

Quote from: gravityblock on April 14, 2015, 03:19:00 AM
I don't think you correctly understand the basic working principles and concepts of whoopy's replication.  The motor isn't inducing the net torque on the flywheel.  The net torque on the flywheel is induced by the inertia of the unbalanced gears!

Please study the motionless axis (#6 in the below image and the snapshot in the video by Whoopy).  The unbalanced gears induces an oscillation, and the oscillations causes the motionless axis to oscillate the pulley which it sits on, transferring a net torque to the flywheel via the rope.  The rope/string has no net movement itself, and this is a clear indication that there is no counter torque on the prime mover or motor, thus a violation of Newton's third law.

This is an inertial drive!  Please show me a working inertial drive built on this forum which is similar to the machine found in the video of the OP.

Gravock
I understand it completely. If you're right about the oscillation is the only reason why the CD-motor spins, you don't need a motor at all. You could just make a gear between the two purple flywheels and start spinning it by hand and released them. They would then power the CD-motor with its frictional loss forever. However, that will not happen. If you try it you will soon enough understand that you are some how mislead to think this is OU.
When you load an oscillation system, the initially 180 degree phase shift between inertia and movement will reduce to less than 180 degrees. Therfor this oscillation system will stop oscillate.


A good demonstration of this is to be found in my video here. As soon as I load the oscillation the wheel stop sooner:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vV3RAL-SWjc


Vidar