MY 'LEVITATING OBJECT' INVENTION

[guest1289]

HAS  'EARNSHAW'S THEOREM'  BEEN VIOLATED

Now  I'm wondering if the part( principle ) of my  invention  which has already been proven to function,   violates    'Earnshaw's Theorem'  .

Below you can examine this principle in it's purest form  ( 1 ),   and how it is implemented in my invention  ( 2 )  .

    ( 1 ) -    http://overunity.com/6048/using-magnets-instead-of-bearings/dlattach/attach/27840/image//     (  this principle has existed for many years   )

    ( 2 ) -  And the  above  principle implemented in my  invention  (  Look at the  post  on  August 11, 2015, 06:33:51 AM ,   and  examine  3_V magneticTrack.jpg   )

Has   'Earnshaw's Theorem'   been violated,  or is this some sort of special exception from the theory(  and mentioned as an  'exception'  in the descriptions of   'Earnshaw's Theorem' )    ?

[MarkE]

HAS  'EARNSHAW'S THEOREM'  BEEN VIOLATED

Now  I'm wondering if the part( principle ) of my  invention  which has already been proven to function,   violates    'Earnshaw's Theorem'  .

Below you can examine this principle in it's purest form  ( 1 ),   and how it is implemented in my invention  ( 2 )  .

    ( 1 ) -    http://overunity.com/6048/using-magnets-instead-of-bearings/dlattach/attach/27840/image//     (  this principle has existed for many years   )

That depends on whether the shaft always stays clear of the posts on the left, and the post on the right.

    ( 2 ) -  And the  above  principle implemented in my  invention  (  Look at the  post  on  August 11, 2015, 06:33:51 AM ,   and  examine  3_V magneticTrack.jpg   )

Has   'Earnshaw's Theorem'   been violated,  or is this some sort of special exception from the theory(  and mentioned as an  'exception'  in the descriptions of   'Earnshaw's Theorem' )    ?

Have you performed any kind of mathematical analysis on how you expect your proposal will function?

[guest1289]

Just to make it simpler to answer the question,   LETS TOTALLY FORGET ABOUT MY INVENTION  ,   only to simplify this particular question.

You can see the  'PRINCIPLE'   actually functioning  without any noticeable problems(  visually noticeable ) in the image below  :

http://overunity.com/6048/using-magnets-instead-of-bearings/dlattach/attach/27840/image// 

(  your browser may only download the image,  and then you have to click on the download  to view it  )

This   'magnetic-bearing'   in the above photo has been replicated in  hundreds of  youtube videos,  and  functions without any noticeable problems .

SO,  in the  image at the  URL  above,  and in the hundreds of youtube replications,   has  'Earnshaw's Theorem'  been violated      ?

(  NOTE : For my own purposes,  I should type that a  new type of  magnetic-bearing  could be based on the above principle in the image at the  aboce  URL ,   and instead   'flattish-round magnets',   magnetic-tubes/pipes   could be used,  for example,  4 pipes arranged in a circle,  and the  'bearing' or  moving-part  spins in the middle of the circle    )

[MarkE]

Just to make it simpler to answer the question,   LETS TOTALLY FORGET ABOUT MY INVENTION  ,   only to simplify this particular question.

You can see the  'PRINCIPLE'   actually functioning  without any noticeable problems(  visually noticeable ) in the image below  :

http://overunity.com/6048/using-magnets-instead-of-bearings/dlattach/attach/27840/image// 

(  your browser may only download the image,  and then you have to click on the download  to view it  )

This   'magnetic-bearing'   in the above photo has been replicated in  hundreds of  youtube videos,  and  functions without any noticeable problems .

SO,  in the  image at the  URL  above,  and in the hundreds of youtube replications,   has  'Earnshaw's Theorem'  been violated      ?

It looks to me like the suspended shaft is up against the front post on the left.  So no, it does not look to be violating Earnshaw's Theorem.  Rather it seems to be an example of it.

[guest1289]

Yes,  that has answered the question.

While you were typing,  I may have invented a  new-type-of-magnetic-bearing,  and I put it into the post containing my question,   as a  modification of the post.

I have pasted it below :

(  NOTE : For my own purposes,  I should type that a  new type of  magnetic-bearing  could be based on the above principle in the image at the  aboce  URL ,   and instead   of  'flattish-round magnets',   magnetic-tubes/pipes   could be used,  for example,  4 pipes arranged in a circle,  and the  'bearing' or  moving-part  spins in the middle of the circle    )