Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



170 watts in - 1600 watts out - looped - Very impressive build and video

Started by e2matrix, February 17, 2018, 01:03:05 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Jeg

Quote from: cheors on March 29, 2018, 08:07:57 AM

Search of the switching frequency:


Hi cheors.
Thanks for sharing your calculations.

When we state the 'delay' function, actually we set the 'on' time of a pin output. So the corresponded frequency is not 1/delay, but 1\(2*delay) instead.



ramset

cheors
Quote
- I think we do not have the exact program:
* The instruction map of Luc is different from the one that is broadcast by Pierre on Youtube.
* We never see all the LEDs off contrary to what is expected with the Youtube version.

end quote
------------------------------------------------
Sir
When you say "the instruction map from Luc"

you are referring to the "Code" which Pierre sent Luc [and he shared here??] is different than the "code" presented by Pierre in his recent Vid ?

and the Pierre presented You tube Code does not match what we should see in his demonstration?


sorry for the intrusion,
Respectfully
Chet K
Whats for yah ne're go bye yah
Thanks Grandma

Cherryman


If you do not need the pot, but only a fixed switch time, i would suggest this:



/************************************************
  Pierre's Original Sketch

  Modded by CM 29 Mar 2018
  Modded by CM 25 Mar 2018
  Modded by TK 24 Mar 2018
  altered for 30-slot stator (gotoluc)

  TKTest Version using pins 2-11,12-21,22-31
************************************************/

// Timers
unsigned long timeStart = 0;
unsigned long currentTime = 0;
bool coilState = HIGH;
int  x = 0;

int coilSequence[] = { 11, 3, 2, 4, 3, 5, 4, 6, 5, 7, 6, 8, 7, 9, 8, 10, 9, 11, 10, 2 };   // set the firing order
int waitTime = 1000;   // time between switching in millis() , this can also be micros()


void setup() // initialize all needed digital pins as OUTPUT
{
  int pin = 1;
  for (pin = 1; pin <= 31; pin ++)
  {
    pinMode(pin, OUTPUT);
  }
}


void loop()
{
  for (int x = 0; x < 20 ; ) ;
  {
    currentTime = millis();   // use micros() if you want to use that
    if (currentTime - timeStart > waitTime) // set the wait time
    {
      coilState = ! coilState ; // switch state
      digitalWrite(coilSequence
  • , coilState), digitalWrite((coilSequence
  • + 10), coilState), digitalWrite((coilSequence
  • + 20), coilState);   // turn on or off
          timeStart = currentTime ;// reset start time
          x++;
        }
      }
    }

seaad

Quote from: ARTMOSART on March 29, 2018, 10:17:49 AM
arne,
.est ce vraiment un champ rotative ? ne peut-il pas s'agir d'un champ vibratoire ? 
EN:
Is it really a rotating field? can not it be a vibratory field?

Your quote: I think thats the core question. A stepping stumbling field contra a smooth floting field as a real moving magnet. I think thats the differece between my 13% output power, or some more, contra Over Unity ! As Pierre says: If you only rotates a magnetic field, you will not get much voltage (power?) Something is missing.


FR/ Votre citation: Je pense que c'est la question centrale. Un trébuchement progressif contre un champ de flottation lisse comme un aimant mobile réel. Je pense que c'est la différence entre ma puissance de sortie de 13%, ou un peu plus, à propos de l'unité ! Si Pierre dit:  Si vous ne faites que tourner un champ magnétique, vous n'obtenez pas beaucoup de tension (courant?) Quelque chose manque.

Cordialement, Regards Arne

cheors

Quote from: Jeg on March 29, 2018, 10:50:25 AM

When we state the 'delay' function, actually we set the 'on' time of a pin output. So the corresponded frequency is not 1/delay, but 1\(2*delay) instead.

The same delay after each switch on or switch off set of instructions :

"digitalWrite(2,HIGH), digitalWrite(14,HIGH), digitalWrite(26,HIGH); // turn the LEDs on
  delay(x);  // wait x milliseconds
  digitalWrite(1,LOW),  digitalWrite(13,LOW),  digitalWrite(25,LOW);  // turn the LEDs off
  delay(x);  // wait x milliseconds  "