Cyril Smith AKA Smudge builders group

[Smudge]

So, what is going to be built here? Was it built before? Are there photos? Can one see a circuit diagram? What does it do?
Greetings, Conrad

Hi Conrad,
I will be starting separate boards for different devices.  The first one is already open
https://overunity.com/18502/nuclear-magnetic-resonance-nmr/msg546019/#msg546019

Smudge

[ramset]

Note to Conrad..I know you have built in tha past..if we can get you support pieces and bits ..
would you consider an experiment ?
I believe you did some very nice work as I recall [good equipment too ?
respectfully Chet K

PS example of Pieces and bits would be the water jacket fixture in Smudges NMR PDF above [or whatever you lack....[realistically] .
////  also probably more "people" help too...

[EMJunkie]

Again what you say just shows how far apart we are in our perspectives.  The magnetic vector potential does exist inside the core and is a measure of the atomic current circulations that are spatially aligned there. 
I cannot explore your territory to help you finish.  My territory will be in the benches I open, the first one being exploring proton spin NMR territory.  https://overunity.com/18502/nuclear-magnetic-resonance-nmr/msg546019/#msg546019  That has resulted in utter silence so far.

Smudge

Smudge, so every Transformer should be Above Unity? This is what you are implying, indirectly! I should point out, several post back, you said Transformer Theory was not part of it?

I don't get where you are trying to go, of course the Energy Transfer mechanism is critical, and this aspect will always see a Lens'z Component, the Negative of the Source, even in your NMR Thread, this is not accounted for. I am confused, I see nothing but problems.

Any Output will be opposed, dampening your Q Factor, effectively no different from Any "Generator", Losses will be extreme, as it is by very definition a Symmetrical System! 

My Members know what I mean here, they see the problem with this.

IHMO you need to think more about the Symmetry of Energy, the Symmetry of Energy Transformation Mechanisms and what defines the Asymmetry of such a System! Also why this is Important.

It should be well known that a Symmetrical System will always be Below Unity, Input = Output - Losses = Below Unity!

Best wishes, stay safe and well in these dire times,
   Chris Sykes


P.S: You are right, I am still missing part of the theory, I have perhaps 99%, missing a very small amount. I am working very hard to get the rest. For interested parties, 99% of my theory is Here. This is why My Members are actively building Above Unity Machines.

[Smudge]

Smudge, so every Transformer should be Above Unity? This is what you are implying, indirectly! I should point out, several post back, you said Transformer Theory was not part of it?

Indeed? where did I say that.  I said transformer theory is incomplete.

I don't get where you are trying to go, of course the Energy Transfer mechanism is critical, and this aspect will always see a Lens'z Component, the Negative of the Source, even in your NMR Thread, this is not accounted for. I am confused, I see nothing but problems.

Again this shows that we hold different viewpoints.

Any Output will be opposed, dampening your Q Factor, effectively no different from Any "Generator", Losses will be extreme, as it is by very definition a Symmetrical System! 

Yet you are forever promoting EPR which you consider OK, but for some reason NMR isn't OK!!  Can you explain why you consider NMR to be a Symmetrical System.

Smudge

[conradelektro]

@Smudge: your ideas and builder groups are very interesting and your papers explain the subject well.

@ramset: my activities and builds are child's play. I have almost no knowledge in electronics and electrical engineering.

I think that Smudge's ideas are very much in the field of material science and therefore are not accessible to laymen. In addition, one needs good electronics (built circuits and measurement equipment) to do the experiments, again expensive and not doable by a layman.

As I found, the new things to explore are in the very small (properties of atoms and of matter particles in general) or in the very big (cosmology, exoplanets, dark matter, dark energy). This needs very expensive equipment and much knowledge to do. Tinkering at home will not be sufficient.

I bought a 3D-printer and started to build electrostatic machines (generators and motors). And I ran into material science again (triboelectric series). What a bummer.

So, if you want to make progress you have to study the properties of matter. And you have to be able to create materials (mixing, manufacturing) according to certain specifications, which is expensive and hardly doable without industrial resources or specialised laboratories.

It is not the time of the gentleman home inventor as in the 19th century.

I always ask in the forums to be specific because many spin an endless tale without coming to the point or do not even say what they have construed. Smudge came to the point, nicely. It is pretty clear what he wants to do, but very difficult to actually do at home.

Which means, I am chickening out.

Greetings, Conrad