Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[rakarskiy]

They won't take us in, my friend Rakarsky, no matter how hard you try.
Among several billion people there is no place for the two of us.
Too many humiliating procedures to go through, even if it happens.
It is more difficult only, perhaps, to make a perpetual motion machine.

And who should take it? It's their problem, not mine. Everything goes according to plan.

I see they want to disable Holcomb's generators and invalidate them. It will be easier when people can make their own generators, which is what I'm striving for. And my arguments, some angry. I love to annoy the trolls out of the system.
There is an expression, it's nice to hear a lie when you know the truth. Messenger of lies, pitiful in your eyes.

[pix]

Oh pix, you are tricky, in your arguments you are similar to "an adherent of the Commission on Pseudoscience of Russian Ostriches" Do not be offended, I have seen enough of these adherents.

We consider the simplest crank press, drive power 8.5 kW at 800 rpm, torque 101 Nm.
The force on the press table develops at 10 kilonewtons, at 8 rpm of the crank shaft.
8:1 downshift torque will increase to 1 kN, (speed down, power up)!

In this case, the press develops a force of 10 kN eight times in 1 minute, while the motor makes 800 rpm. (time span 1 minute)
7.5 seconds per revolution, while the pressing action itself is up to 2 seconds.
2 seconds * 8 times/revolution = 16 seconds.
16/60 = 0.26 of a period of one minute.
10 kN * 8 * 0.26 = 20.8 kN.

And so with a decrease from the motor on the shaft of 1 kNm, and the press developed 20.8 kN, while doing the work of pressing 8 parts.

You described a simple machine. Leverage. No OU here.

[rakarskiy]

You described a simple machine. Leverage. No OU here.

Result OU!
the input of force into the device is 101 Nm (costs are 8.5 kW), the output of the force that does the work is 20,000 N !
It is paradoxical that they did not ask: where from?

Good luck with your search for OU.   

[pix]

Result OU!
the input of force into the device is 101 Nm (costs are 8.5 kW), the output of the force that does the work is 20,000 N !
It is paradoxical that they did not ask: where from?

Good luck with your search for OU. 

Wrong. Wrong.Wrong.


Power= (Torque x rev/min)/9559  [kW]


Your example input power :
Pin= (101[Nm] x 800 [1/min] )/9500 = 8,5 [kW]


Output power:
Pout = (10100 [Nm] x 8[1/min])/9500 = 8,5 [kW]


Of course taking mechanical losses COP<1.
You will not get OU from leveraging simple machine 


Cheers,
Pix

[rakarskiy]

Your example input power :
Pin= (101[Nm] x 800 [1/min] )/9500 = 8,5 [kW]
Output power:
Pout = (10100 [Nm] x 8[1/min])/9500 = 8,5 [kW]

Resulting force on the shaft work 20000 [N] 

quite a bit more, probably the engineers should not have bothered installing the flywheel.