Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

Started by ramset, March 14, 2022, 11:07:24 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 64 Guests are viewing this topic.

SolarLab

Quote from: Beginners Mind on June 20, 2022, 05:51:37 PM
SolarLab,

Thanks for the links.  Your hypotheses make a lot of sense when based on DC pulses and are very much like what I expected might be happening in all the original patent applications.  But if HES has now dispensed with DC pulses entirely and is currently operating completely on AC to create the RMF, do these ideas still apply?  AC does not throw discrete snowballs like DC pulses do.  Is another hypothesis needed?  What do you think?  Dispensing with sequential DC pulses makes the workings of this tech ever more fascinating.


Beginners Mind,

Don't know - without looking at it a bit more, I can only guess - which is not of much value.

Just "shooting from the hip" so to speak - but using AC, especially for larger kW units or one
that's already tied to the grid, is probably an easier method. Adjusting the phases should be
relatively straight forward and there's a lot of history to fall back on.

Looking at the fundamentals of Holcombs scheme, the key is in moving only the magnetic field,
and not moving anything else. Sweeping or rotating the field over the stator coils is where the
larger part of 400-600% gain (?) is achieved. There should be no "magnetic drag" or filling the
generator cavity with, swirling, unwanted fields.

The required phasing of the poles to achieve conventional 50/60 Hz frequency is probably old art.

Not experienced enough in motor/generator art to say for sure, however, but I can figure out a
power factor correction cap value!  :)

Will leave this one for the experts here!

SL



Jimboot

Quote from: rakarskiy on June 19, 2022, 02:43:31 PM
Just information from one of my readers!

...did an experiment with a positive result... Simply by connecting 2 coils on the rotor of a single-phase generator in series (8 ohms) to an outlet. When the load was connected (heater 700 watts), I received 50 watts from the wattmeter from the outlet, and at the output of the generator, also through the wattmeter, I received 150 watts ... I also tried the reverse circuit, where the rotor and stator were swapped ... the result turned out worse , at the input 90 watts at the output is also 140-150 watts!

Small screenshots from the video he sent me!
ANyone else tried this? Think I'll try tonight.

rakarskiy

Quote from: Jimboot on June 20, 2022, 08:54:37 PM
ANyone else tried this? Think I'll try tonight.

If you are going to conduct an experiment, connect the rotor circuit through LATR, connect the load. Next, you need to find the position of the rotor at which the process will have a working moment. Moving even half of the surface of a part of a stator tooth can be critical for a two-pole rotor.

Good luck.

Lunkster

I am so thankful for Dr. Holcomb and the work he is doing.
He is so much farther than I am in developing motionless electrical energy.

I think his approach of staying with the current standards of 50Hz and 60Hz
is a no-brainer.  This technology is like a cut and paste into the home or business
power needs.

But even though this is the way to bring this technology into the world, it
does bring some questions I have about this technology.

What is the optimal frequency for this technology?  Is it 100Hz, 200Hz, 400Hz?
If there are other frequencies that produce larger COP values, then in
the future will we see DC output products that use an internal operational
frequency other than 50Hz or 60Hz?

Another question:
Can this technology be put into power assist bicycles and other products
that will multiply the range of those products?  I know that a COP over 1 will
give a product with infinite range, but I still need to get my exercise. 

Do the current Patents protect HES from other FE generators to compete with them
in the area of power generation with COP greater than 1.

Since the patents claim an increase of power amplification due to the amplification
through industrial steel,  can other patents claiming increase of power generation
through a different technique of accessing the torque of magnetic fields be used
in providing a generator that does not conflict with Dr. Holcomb's patents?

If I had the resources to invest with Dr. Holcomb,  would that be
a good thing to do at this time?

Lunkster



alan

For anyone who is able, try to make it mechanical: 
4 magnets, 2 poles, n-s-n-s around, n facing n, s facing s. On a rotor. 
Inside the rotor the stationary coil with the axis parallel  to the rotor axis. 
Now when the rotor rotates, dphi/dt inside the coil remains constant, but the field definitely moves: B = curl A and E=-dA/dt, (no dphi/dt, nothing to counter (assumption)), but still an electric field due to dA/dt caused by rotating B.
"Can this technology be put into power assist bicycles and other products that will multiply the range of those products?" 
That would be cool. :) for any small vehicle.