The Brnbrade Coil/Overunity?

[jacob]

@ Jacob, EM and ALL

I now STRONGLY suspect DECEIT in the picture of the bulb.  I need someone to confirm the following:

If you blow the picture up large, (it is of high resolution) you can see the three input prongs of the light bulb.  AND NONE OF THEM have ANY INPUT from the two orange wires.  

The ONLY INPUT is from the BATTERY CABLE connectors.  This would explain why no volt reading (not hooked up, would give it away) AND why the wires go off of the table to no-where!!

I am never quick to dismiss nor quick to believe, but I have to dismiss this based on the photo, unless someone sees something I have missed...  

Bruce

Bruce, for some reason, I cannot download the picture. Can you email it to me?

The talk goes around the Farland Cook patents has been deliberatly changed.....
I do not know the reference source of where i heard it, but i am sure it was about these particulair coils.

Yes it was. And you heard it from me Marco. I made that claim a few times and the reason is simple. When you read the patent, it refers to elements in the drawing that are absent from the document. Therefore the conclusion that the drawing has been altered by simply erasing some of the circuit elements.

Jacob

Jacob,  if you would be so kind, can you provide a reference for your claim.  

I scanned the patent over and I don't see any references to other figures besides Figure 1 and Figure 2.  (I used www.pat2pdf.org)  Perhaps you have a hard copy with a different text?    By the way, the No 16 and No 30 referenced in the document mean wire number, or size, or gage, not a part number on some missing figure, at least that's the way I read it.

EM

Sure EM, no problem. On the first text page, approximatively in the middle of the second column, you'll find the following text:

... the opposing initial secondary currents of the two helices B C being overpowered do not manifest themselves in the main circuit D of the battery, there being eight distincts currents developped in the action of one entire circuit of the two pairs of helices...

Unless I miss something, I dont see anything labelled as D in the drawing. Another reference to D also appears toward the very end of the text as follow:

For the purpose of preventing the heating of the helices caused by the intensity of the action, and to prevent circulation of the initial secondary currents in the main circuit, a rheostat of any convenient form may be made to constitute a part of the main circuit D.

The main circuit D is nowhere to be seen. Therefore my claim that this patent has been tampered with in order to make any replication attempt unsuccessfull. Obviously, there would be no motive to modify a design that doesn't work. I'll let you draw your own conclusions...

Regards,

Jacob

[jacob]

@ Bruce,

Please disregard my last request. I see that some enlargement have been posted.

[wattsup]

@btenzer

Off the terminal the right orange is going to the top bulb terminal and is held in place by the red meter probe alligator clip.

The other orange is going to the bottom bulb terminal and is held in place by the black meter probe alligator clip.

@unicorn

In actual fact the capacitor is not doing anything in the circuit because there is no charge/discharge control. But maybe when the sound it connected the fluctuations need the capacitor. But with straight DC-DC there is no need.

[bob.rennips]

Stefan,

Just to respect Steven can you move this to somewhere other that Steven Marks TPU devices.......it just aint..and has no place here .

I don't see why this is disrespectful.

I think you are being too hasty. You don't know how the TPU works - we only have theories and some promising experiments. If you know otherwise do tell...

The pulsing of electric fields, which IS what brnbrade is doing in his device, has direct parallels to SM's statement of 'removing the effects of the magnetic field'  and could be interpreted as dealing with the electric field.

The idea that a stereo connection also adds to the effect also has direct relevance to the SM TPU. Many people, including myself, have identified phase, as being very important to the SM TPU. Only yesterday, Bob Boyce, who is a seasoned researcher into SM TPU style setups, reinforced this idea. A stereo signal uses very slight phase differences in the two signals to create the sound stage. It is very interesting that this appears to work with this device. I've added it to my list of experiments to try.

My current experiments, not all of which I've posted online yet, show some promising 'effects', concerning enhancing the electric field around an SM style TPU.

SM has also freely talked about solidstate components not being mounted near the fibreglass circuit board. Why ? Because of electric field effects.

As such I think these posts should stay around in the SM forum area.

[jacob]

@ Bruce:

I agree with EM. At this point, why don't we just wait and see.

Stefan,

Just to respect Steven can you move this to somewhere other that Steven Marks TPU devices.......it just aint..and has no place here .

Hi Lindsay,

I am not so sure about that. Actually I wouldn't be surprised if the core of the winding was actually part of the original circuit. And if so, it would act as the collector in a TPU. Of course it is not torroidal, but if you remember, Steven suggested that we start experimenting with non torroidal designs because it was easier and less dangerous.

And let's not forget that we are not only seeking to reproduce the TPU, but first and foremost to understand what makes it tick. And the process that goes on in the Cook McFarland device could be very closely related to what goes on in the TPU. How can we build something that works if we have no clue of the process we wish to create?

Jacob