The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[Top Gun]

I have now uploaded the new presentation file in
http://rapidshare.com/files/114061255/New_Energy_V88.PPT.html

If we assume the displacement function is an arc, the remaining variable is the force function. 

1. Can you show how different force functions do different work? 

2. Which force function will Lead Out the maximum gravitational energy?  

3. How would this affect (or improve) the many known Over Unity Inventions?

Dear Devil,

The answer to (2) requires much more knowledge than ?O level Physics?.

One needs the knowledge of Integral Calculus.  In the attached diagram, Pendulum13.jpg, the first term of the equation represents the Work Integral in its general form.  In English, it says that the work done from Point A (represented by x1, y1 coordinate) to Point B (represented by x2, y2 coordinate) is the vector multiplication of the Force Function (F) and the infinitely small increment of the Displacement Function.  Please note the dot notation.

To explain this concept to the layman, I shall state the following:
(1)   The path or displacement is divided up into very small sections ? assuming the exact path is known.
(2)   The Force at each small section is known ? assuming that the Force Function is known.
(3)   The work done in each section is the vector multiplication of the Force at that section and the small displacement.
(4)   The sum of the work done from Point A to Point B is the sum of the work done in all these sections.

The RHS of the equation states that we can deal with the horizontal component (x) and the vertical component (y) separately at each section.  If we do that, we can use normal multiplication and not vector multiplication.

How much gravitational energy is Lead Out can be calculated by comparing the different Force Functions on the Displacement Function (that turned out to be an arc).  The best Force Function from such calculations is Tangential.  The first Lee-Tseung Pull is horizontal ? which is really tangential when starting from rest.

Mr. Tseung simplified the mathematics by focusing on the first Pull only.  He used a constant horizontal Force Function in his illustration.  That case definitely shows a Lead Out gravitational energy.

To be more exact, any Force Function showing tension on the string via Scale A will show a vertical work done by the string.  Some gravitation energy will be Lead Out.

Thus Mr. Tseung is justified in his statement that the tension of the string contributes to the work done.  In other words, Gravity does work (and hence supplies energy) via the tension of the string.

Is this explanation clear enough???

[WilbyInebriated]

ramen, and may you forever be touched by his noodlelike appendage.

[Kul_ash]

I have now uploaded the new presentation file in
http://rapidshare.com/files/114061255/New_Energy_V88.PPT.html

If we assume the displacement function is an arc, the remaining variable is the force function. 

1. Can you show how different force functions do different work? 

2. Which force function will Lead Out the maximum gravitational energy?  

3. How would this affect (or improve) the many known Over Unity Inventions?

Dear Devil,

The answer to (2) requires much more knowledge than ?O level Physics?.

One needs the knowledge of Integral Calculus.  In the attached diagram, Pendulum13.jpg, the first term of the equation represents the Work Integral in its general form.  In English, it says that the work done from Point A (represented by x1, y1 coordinate) to Point B (represented by x2, y2 coordinate) is the vector multiplication of the Force Function (F) and the infinitely small increment of the Displacement Function.  Please note the dot notation.

To explain this concept to the layman, I shall state the following:
(1)   The path or displacement is divided up into very small sections ? assuming the exact path is known.
(2)   The Force at each small section is known ? assuming that the Force Function is known.
(3)   The work done in each section is the vector multiplication of the Force at that section and the small displacement.
(4)   The sum of the work done from Point A to Point B is the sum of the work done in all these sections.

The RHS of the equation states that we can deal with the horizontal component (x) and the vertical component (y) separately at each section.  If we do that, we can use normal multiplication and not vector multiplication.

How much gravitational energy is Lead Out can be calculated by comparing the different Force Functions on the Displacement Function (that turned out to be an arc).  The best Force Function from such calculations is Tangential.  The first Lee-Tseung Pull is horizontal ? which is really tangential when starting from rest.

Mr. Tseung simplified the mathematics by focusing on the first Pull only.  He used a constant horizontal Force Function in his illustration.  That case definitely shows a Lead Out gravitational energy.

To be more exact, any Force Function showing tension on the string via Scale A will show a vertical work done by the string.  Some gravitation energy will be Lead Out.

Thus Mr. Tseung is justified in his statement that the tension of the string contributes to the work done.  In other words, Gravity does work (and hence supplies energy) via the tension of the string.

Is this explanation clear enough???

Dear Top_Gun
Please provide analysis for lead out energy using this formula step by step. At what point was the energy from gravity was lead out or you can find it directly at the equlibrium position?

[Koen1]

please address how my analysis was wildly off topic. i asked you first, you seem to like to play this question game with people to avoid questions posed to you. when you clarify your statement we can move on to your question.

The topic of the thread is the Lee-Tseung theory.  You did not address the merits of the theory, merely how many times this thread has been viewed.  While your post was perhaps responsive to another post, it was not on-topic, as it did not address the theory itself.

Wilby likes to play holier than thou games and nag about others being immature.
He seems to forget nobody forces him to read that stuff, and nobody really wants to hear his
"grow up and don't be childish" speech...
I think he only does it because there is something he needs to compensate for, and that's
why he nags others about stuff they didn't ask his opinion about.

It's too bad he's come to our comedy show to spoil the fun. 

[Ben Waballs]

Wannabe hasnt spoiled our fun,

Larrys game has been dead for years, if he ever had any at all,  wannabe doesnt even have the basic physics to challenge that part of it. All he can do is try and stir up trouble, and hes a pathetic troll. Really bad at trolling actually.
But you can tell from his scribbling that he is illiterate, and probably lives with mommy. So, tell your mommy that she is welcome, we know day care costs a lot on a hookers paycheck. We are glad to help you out with your retarded section 8 son, just give us a bigger discount next time we come over, k?  And please, keep your back shaved, it keeps the customers 'coming'.