Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



PMM by wizkycho

Started by wizkycho, June 02, 2005, 12:56:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

m668004

@all

What do you think about this? 4 diskmagnets were used. The 2 outer magnets are connected by an rotating axis. The 2 inner magnets were connected to move freely in horizontal direction. When the axis is rotating, one of the inner magnets get repelled, the other attracted, so the work required to repell will compensated by the attraction of the other side, so the total amount of work to rotate the 2 outer magnets is very small, maybe smaller then the work done by the inner pushed and pulled magnets.

M.

wizkycho

It's not meaningful to do the certain things and this scheme is described in Museum unworkable devices. And besides I tried many schemes, so this one is substantially clear to me.

But THIS scheme works a little differently:
http://kalinin-engine.com/index.html
Quote

Sorry I haven't seen this blasphemous "museum". What it says ? can You send a link to it.
Or would be much appropriate to say in Your own words and facts WHY it won't work.

BTW: complexity of proposed design exceeds practicality.

m668004

@wizkycho

Here is the link, but I think, your device operates in an other mode, so it's not the same like in the museum. I think yours will work.

http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/museum/unwork.htm

M.

wizkycho

Quote from: m668004 on June 03, 2005, 06:57:35 AM
@all

What do you think about this? 4 diskmagnets were used. The 2 outer magnets are connected by an rotating axis. The 2 inner magnets were connected to move freely in horizontal direction. When the axis is rotating, one of the inner magnets get repelled, the other attracted, so the work required to repell will compensated by the attraction of the other side, so the total amount of work to rotate the 2 outer magnets is very small.

M.

very nice try but:

magnetfieldstrenght= magnetstrenght/distance^2
small distance rise means large field strenght weakening

let magnet on right is in attract mode to piston
let magnet on left is in repulsion mode to piston
     therefore attraction magnet is much CLOSER to piston then repel magnet is
     therefore ATTRACTION force is STRONGER than repel force. (cause attractor magnet is closer)
     therefore a lot of force must be applied to unstick from attraction wich prevails in this setup.

         Design made like this won't work ! Am I right ?


m668004

@wizkycho

Thank you for your answer. The two inner magnets (piston) can move freely and easily. So when for example the left magnet gets in repulsion mode, the piston can move easily away and has not to wait until the full repulsion is arrived. Perhaps this makes a small but importent differences.

M.