The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)

[pauldude000]

@AM

You would. (Or at least should.) Consider a regular generator. How much energy of the output is required to drive the field? 1%, 5%? The rest of the energy to drive the unit is eaten up with friction, hysteresis, eddy loss, magnetic field fighting itself, etc. etc. etc., with the majority involved with spinning the huge mass of the rotor. A rotating field is frictionless, and of little apparent mass, and by nature cannot fight itself, or it will not rotate to begin with.

The only "friction" in the system is the magnetic field dragging over inductors. The only rotational mass/inertia is the apparent mass of the field itself, which is very, very small indeed. The field does not fight itself through attraction to itself. The limitations then are dependent upon maximum field strength and speed of rotation. Strength is limited by driving power, and rotation is limited by inductor drag and overall field energy.

Output therefore is determinable just like any other generation system, depending upon the winding style of the collectors.

Paul

[aleks]

Output therefore is determinable just like any other generation system, depending upon the winding style of the collectors.

There won't be any surplus energy. It's sad this is not obvious to you. The 'sine wave' output Otto got is actually a serie of "sine-wave" wavelets, there is no continuous sine wave available by itself, no filters no nothing. Not to note this combined "sinewave" provides a lot of energy at a given voltage, because this voltage is genuinely not from the circuitry: circuitry does not and cannot have that energy. The only thing I hope somebody tries is to use collector coil as an antenna - not as a part of circuitry.

[AhuraMazda]

@aleks

The only thing I hope somebody tries is to use collector coil as an antenna - not as a part of circuitry.

An antenna to receive what?
We must identify the source of energy first. If switching magnets can some how manipulate gravity or the Earths own magnetic
field the we may get something.

As far as the waves shape goes, the lazy person in me say's use square waves but look around you. We live in an
analogue world and sine waves have a lot of properties. You can get a lot more interesting harmonics than you would
with square waves. Look at the works of Keeley or Russel and you see what I mean.

I think text book Electronic or Electrical engineering view is not enough to solve this riddle.

AM

[sparks]

       I think paul's analogy to an alternator holds merit.  Say you can create a standing magnetic field.  Then the Earth's rotation causes the standing magnetic field to meet up with a coil.  The coil cuts across this field and out comes voltage.
Basically using the Earth to move your stator through a relatively stationary magnetic field.  This would create drag on Earth's spin momentum but she's pretty big and going pretty fast.  Is the frequency of conversion this easy?  It really isn't THat easy because the relevant  motion of a fixed point on Earth to the aether changes with lattitude and longitude and who knows the Earth may warp the aether instead of passing through it.  A point on the Earth is also traveling at 67,000 miles an hour in the orbital inertial field around the Sun.  This changes with not only longitude and lattitude but time of day.  I know Hutchinson use to have to wait around 6hours sometimes before his machines would work.

[aleks]

An antenna to receive what?
We must identify the source of energy first. If magnetism can some manipulate gravity or the Earths own magnetic
field the we may get something.

Well, antenna does not receive anything. It is staying in a higher potential field acting as a terminal on a battery. The energy is taken from everywhere it can be taken, even via matter disintegration.

I know it's hard to grasp this concept, but do you really know what IS energy that is running via your power outlet? Nobody really knows that. What is important is POTENTIAL. Well, the MOSFET pulsing creates the required potential - there is nothing you should worry about beside that. If you place two concentric antennas, both will have differing potentials relative to kicker coils. So, you may not even need ground if you use two antennas - it is much like Otto's mebius wires, but I think you do not need to connect them that way: simply assume that larger antenna is higher potential, smaller (inner) antenna is lower potential. The energy will find its way from higher to lower. The air gap between the antennas is a wrong way, so the energy will flow via wire you may use to connect two antennas. And then you can take some energy from the flow.