Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



RESONANCE EFFECTS FOR EVERYONE TO SHARE

Started by gotoluc, December 03, 2008, 01:26:15 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 39 Guests are viewing this topic.

duff

Quote from: gotoluc on January 25, 2009, 08:45:39 PM

Two days ago I discovered something new (to me anyways) to which I will share a circuit very soon.

I am able to get my coils resonating using only one wire as an input pulse!... no return and no ground!... how's that for efficiency ;D


There is a return to ground.

You are capacitively coupled to the circuit. It's the same principle in which a vertical antenna works. The vertical element is driven with no apparent ground connection however it is capacitively coupled.

In Tesla's Colorado Springs Experiments he discovered that the height of an elevated ball changed the capacitance of the circuit. Again an example of a  capacitive coupling to ground and the surroundings.


-Duff

[Edit]
The vertical antenna may not be a very good example because ground is connected to a ground plane but the height of an antenna affects the resonant frequency through a capacitive coupling.

wattsup

@Groundloop

I sent the files to my brother and will see what he says. I also invited  him to register here so he can ask you any questions directly.

Oh yeh - I like your web site. Lot's of goodies.

@gotolouc

Can't wait to get this reverse pulsing circuit cause I have lots of coils and stuff f to test with it. More fun. lol

@all

Oh, regarding my solenoid circuit, I changed the IRF840 and the circuit works perfectly pulsing that damn strong solenoid with some 100vdc - lol. Will try adjusting those pots today and see if they change the pulsing rate.

Now given the fact that I am a real pro at blowing mosfets (and even toasting breadboards - lol), I have found that for doing my tests, I now mount the mosfets on this three pinned terminal as shown below. This makes it quick and easy to wire into any type of testing. The question, is it possible to put four of these on the circuit board in case I need to change the mosfets and not have to deal with unsoldering what I know will blow at least a few times - lol.

duff

@groundloop

Which transistor did you end up using on the board?

You were trying to get the current down and going to try replacing the MJH11022 with the NTE2354.

Is the NTE2354 what you are using now?

I have to say that I hope not because those list for $14.09 each.... :o


sparks

      A wire has a bunch of free electrons near the skin of the coil.  You can do two things with this electron cloud.   You can accelerate a #of electrons at the contact point or the ones in the crystal that have an excess of electrons and transmit the power by randomized electron acceleration which causes heating in the conductor  or you can transmit a longitudinal emwave through the electron cloud.  Unresisted.  You drop a stone in a pool of water the water molecules near where you dropped the stone do not reach the beach.  But the reaction of the media does.  We are taught that in a conductor there is a flow of - charge  in one direction and positive charge in the other.   Now that's pretty obvious until along comes someone and says it's the electrons moving that is carrying the charge down to the end of the wire.  So what form of mass is moving towards the other end of the wire.  Or is it the lack of mass that is moving towards the other end of the wire.  Well that makes the lack of mass a scource of positive charge and mass a scource of negative charge.  So how is it possible to assign a proton a positive charge when it is a form of mass.  Probably because it weighs just a little tiny bit less than a neutron.  A proton is spinning while a neutron is just dead mass.  The charge of the proton arises from the lack of dead mass in it's near field.  The vacuum is altered in this near field or as Einstein postulated spacetime is curved.
More like the vacuum is condensed in this near field and the more lack of mass you have the higher the positive charge.  Which will move first in a conductor?  The lack of mass or mass? 
Think Legacy
A spark gap is cold cold cold
Space is a hot hot liquid
Spread the Love

Groundloop

@duff,

I recommend using HEXFETs in the circuit. The transistors does
not do a good job. On Luc's circuit I put the IRF840. Any N-Type
high voltage HEXFET will do fine. Remember the extra resistor
when using hexfets.

Groundloop.