Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

Started by Mannix, January 30, 2006, 06:18:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 50 Guests are viewing this topic.

Elvis Oswald

Oh yeah...  Aluminum amplifies signals at certain frequencies. 

"30 db amplification at 2.6 Ghz and a 20 db amplification at 1.2 Ghz"

http://people.csail.mit.edu/rahimi/helmet/

hartiberlin

>You mention that you find the inertial effects of my technology as being interesting to you. All I can say is, MY GOD YOU HAVE NO IDEA JUST >HOW INTERESTING!!!?

I can imagine that.
An all solid state electronic circuit that has inertia and would want to resist movement like
a spinning gyroscop would be very interesting !


>Do you remember our brief discussion about if it could provide a motive force?
>I am not sure if I should comment more at this time.

Yes, if the frequencies are changed probably it could also generate an unidirectional force
defying Newston?s 3rd law.



>I would like to answer a few questions I have read on Stefan's web site..
>I would like to mention Stefan and Freedom fuel and Bushwacker and Mica individually but instead I will just make statements that can be relevant >to whomever as needed.
>First of all:
>1.? ? There are several parts of the power unit which have patents. Remember that the power unit technology is owned by the UEC corporation >and I have to be very careful about not stepping on their toes. I am not afraid of them or anything like that. It is just that they are the legitimate >owners of the patents and most of the research ect. I would not like to break my trust with them.
>However, I can, and will give to all of you as much information as I can. I believe that I will be able to give you enough information to begin >research on your own. I just have to pass it in front of my attorney first so I do not get myself into trouble, that's all.

That is okay with us.

>2.? ? I will in time give out a basic Hardware diagram which you may find helpful.

That would be very nice. At least a basic instruction how to see the basic "noise" effect inside
a transformer or something liks this, so we can see, that there is indeed a bigger spike
pulse coming out of a small excitation pulse.


>3? ? No I will not publish a schematic diagram of the control circuit.
>It is proprietary information owned and controlled by the UEC corporation, so I won't go there.

Okay, sure.

>4? ? I will tell you about my initial experiments and what Electron tube circuits I used to control the frequencies that gave us our significant >breakthroughs way back when.

Yes, maybe we can try first the basic effects and lean from thereon forward.


>5? ? Yes, Stefan I do intend to point you in the right direction.
>You deserve at least that much for all of the good effort you have put forth for so long. And especially your kindness to me.

Many thanks I appreciate it very much.


>6? ? About the Flame like Discharge. Yes it does cause RF burns. I was going to tell about that, but I decided to wait and see how long it would take one of you to realize this on your own. Bravo!

Yes, it looks like some ofthe flames I could draw with my 2000 Volts DC battery power supplies, when
drawing arcs with it via the Newman coil.
As your output seems to be chopped DC with an RF noise superimposed on it, this is simular to what
I have seen.



>7? ? The patents are in several segments pertaining only to the control units not the collector coil itself,
>so I will send you examples of the hardware diagrams.
>however, I do not have access to a PC at all times so it will take some time for me to be able to scan things and send them off, be patient please. >Also I am not spending all my time sitting in front of a PC reading and sending.
>I must travel to a public place in order to safely send any information at all.

Okay, this is very kind of you. Looking forward to see the information.



>8.? ? YES, torodial transformers have some very weird factors..? Study the strange factors.

Yes, we should do this.



>9? ? Your interest in the harmonic resonance is also stepping toward the right direction of things.
>But then again it depends on your viewpoint about exactly what harmonic resonance is
>and how it relates to mag fields and converting energy as does my power unit.


I see.

>10? ? We have done a great deal of experimentation with permanent magnets with some very astounding results.
>I could stop now and start over again with that subject alone. Has anyone ever read any of the reports about our experiments with what was >called, the Magnetic shadow casting material?


What is the Magnetic shadow casting material? ?Have not heard about this yet ...



>No it wasn't some kind of paint.
> But you would be fascinated with the amount of renewable energy you can extract from a permanent magnet!
>We went through about ten thousand dollars worth of Neodymium and
>Super Cobalt 404 magnetic material in our experiments.
>I could write volumes of information about that stuff. Those experiments tie in to our development of the power unit.

Would be very interested to hear about that too !


>11? ? Yes, I agree, why does everybody assume that magnetic fields are so single dimensional?
>they are not . . .they can't be.

How many dimensions do you think they have ?


>12? ? Who ever it was that said there might be possibly military applications for this technology is a very wise man. We believe that is probably the >primary government interest followed by the ever popular oil industry trying to stop it.

Can imagine, that the black projects are already a few years ahead of us.
As they are so top secret I could imagine the oil industry does not know
of them either. But as they are so top secret they are also not used
yet, only for top secret military demonstration, I guess...



>13? ? I am sorry, they are not piezo stacks. However, they do look like it. And some of what you said is not far off at all.
>14? ? Both Freedomfuel and bushwacker have good and relevant points.
>15? ? Yes there is an inertia.
>16? ? Yes there is a genuine gyroscopic effect when the units are on.
>Everybody has noticed that when held and in operation,
>the units have a definite vibration and have a gyroscopic effect.
>They seam to resist being moved through the air.
>When placed on a smooth surface it is very pronounced.
> Some of you should think about that.

Very intersting ! Seems to be like a solid state gyroscop !


>17? ? Rotation of field. . . How many people think about that.
>If you could have a field that you could think of as a big ball.
>And you could rotate it in two directions what would the ramifications be?

Hmm, the ball is turning right or in the other case left around.
Hmm, why would this change the output power ?
Does it need to turn counter wise to the earth magnet field
or the earth rotation to cut their magnet field ?

But to my understanding the earth has a about 30 to 40 uTesla
strong STATIC magnetic field in every place or does it vary much ?



>I hope some of you will appreciate this info, my direct response and the spirit in which it is given.
>Sincerely,
>SM

Steven , many thanks, I hope you can give us more infos and we appreciate
it very much.

Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.

Stefan Hartmann, Moderator of the overunity.com forum

hartiberlin

If you look closer again to this picture:
http://harti.com/coil/energycoil44.jpg

you can see, that there are probably 4 coils
wound on each of the 2 control circuit toroids
ontop of the box inside the big coil in the center.

If these 2 toroids have counter rotating magnets fields
like in
http://harti.com/coil/toroid_gen.gif
but every toroid has a different rotating direction, so one is
clockwise and the other counter clockwise, there would
buildup indeed an interesting interference moiree pattern
in a magnetic field around it.
Maybe the bigger outer toroid just catches this moiree magnetic
pattern and converts it to output energy ?

Or does it make sense, if the 2 smaller inner toroids have the
same rotation direction with their magnetic fields somehow ?

Regards, Stefan.
Stefan Hartmann, Moderator of the overunity.com forum

shadow

Hallo Zusammen,

bin neu hier und hatte gestern Abend eine verr?ckte Theorie die ich hier mal vorstellen wollte. Bekomme den Text leider nicht auf Englisch hin.

Zu meiner Theorie: 

Jeder kennt ja das Ph?nomen einer vollen Badewanne wenn man den St?psel am Abfluss zieht. Es entsteht ein Strudel, der sich nach unten hin verj?ngt und somit beschleunigt. 

Vielleicht arbeitet Steven Marks Ger?t wie eine Art Abfluss f?r das Erdmagnetfeld, wobei der Abfluss ein Konverter ist, der die magnetischen Felder in f?r uns nutzbare elektrische Energie umwandelt.

Wird das Ger?t gestartet entsteht durch den "Abfluss" des Erdmagnetfeldes ein magnetischer Wirbelsturm. ?hnlich wie in der Badewanne verj?ngt sich dieser nach unten hin und wird beschleunigt und dann im Ger?t gewandelt.


Das schwache Erdmagnetfeld wird auf diese weise konzentriert und somit nutzbar.

Jeder Wirbelsturm hat im Zentrum das so genannte "Auge" in dem nicht sehr viel passiert, vielleicht erkl?rt das den Aufbau des Ger?tes.

In dem 180MB Video wird bei 32min 40sek ein Ger?t auf den Kopf gestellt, was daraufhin seinen Betrieb einstellt. Eine Erkl?rung daf?r w?re vielleicht das jeder Wirbelsturm eine bevorzugte Drehrichtung hat, beeinflusst durch die Corioliskraft.
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corioliskraft . Vielleicht stimmt hier die bevorzugte Drehrichtung nicht mehr mit der der elektrischen Schaltung des Ger?tes ?berein.

Wie gesagt nur ne verr?ckte Theorie, aber vielleicht ist ja was dran?

shadow

hartiberlin

Hi Shadow, that is a very interesting idea, that you compare the bath tube vortex
in the water, when you release the water from the bath tube with this
magnetic vortex, which might be here at play with the Marks device.
Maybe Marks is really just creating a vortex inside the center of the big
coil with his 2 small toroidal coils and thus attracts a 3 dimensional
magnetic vortex which whirles into the center and thus "charges" all
the time the output outer coil ?

But then I wonder how the small units work as they don?t have exiter
coils inside the center of the toroid ?

Maybe also the skin effects works positively if used in a vortex excitation
sequence ?
Will the skin effect then add current into the system when used in a vortex condition
or will it also break and drag the current down ?

Regards, Stefan.
Stefan Hartmann, Moderator of the overunity.com forum