Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[fuzzytomcat]

I'm not saying it shouldn't be pursued. I'm saying TK has done more than enough. I'm satisfied there is no OU to be had with the circuits presented so far. If Rosemary, Aaron, FuzzyTomCat, Jetijs, AllCanadian, et al. want to carry on, more power to them. When they can present some unambiguous evidence they have achieved what Rosemary's circuits fail to, let them present their case. Oh yeah, don't forget Wilby.    If it interests him enough, I'm sure TK would step up to the plate.

And I have requested this be properly put to bed. A lot of work has been done, it should be prepared as if it was to be submitted for peer review. I don't think it should be dropped and forgotten. It might even be a good idea, as TK suggested, to submit it to a journal for publication.

There are other mysteries out there, begging for some attention (including a couple of mine  ). I think we would all be better served if TK applied some of his energy and talent to those. This one has been solved.

Hey Oc,

There was a posting I made earlyer in the thread, a reply to henieck on: July 12, 2009, 11:33:52 PM

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7620.msg190915#msg190915

"MY QUOTE" -
As your familiar with the RA circuit and have a good knowledge of electronics I think you wold agree that if the circuit works great ...  if it doesn't the first person that figures out whats wrong and corrects the problem using the old "copyright" notice will have some exclusive rights, so maybe it's off to the races so to speak? I find the circuit interesting, possibly unique and RA is the one that came up with what is being discussed no one else but her co-author "years" ago, and no one can take that away .....

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Just for the record ..... so to speak ..... also my Tektronix 2445a oscilloscope was out getting calibrated so the only wave I could see coming out of the circuit would be of the ocean kind and there was no tsunami that was visible. 

Fuzzy

[0c]

Hey Oc,

There was a posting I made earlyer in the thread, a reply to henieck on: July 12, 2009,

No offense intended. Care to contribute any data, schematics, photos, or test protocols to the archives?

[fuzzytomcat]

No offense intended. Care to contribute any data, schematics, photos, or test protocols to the archives?

@ Oc

Well I talked about it to members on both sides of the pond and personally never have ever posted results on replications for the obvious reasons, on any device because of to many variables to make mistakes. I did see things with my scope I wasn't sure of ..... electronic and power signals are one thing and when messing around saw something I never saw before I thought something was wrong with my scope, and sent it out for calibration. It was my knowing utility power as I do and forced a grounding and "ground loop" issue which TK from one of his statements (kinda a loaded question) and through his work in posting videos on my questioning him is when he replicated what I saw and he knew what it was and I didn't, this is in reference to the audio signal, thats his find.  I will admit there are far better electronic masters here or there and my hope is for us all to learn something from this simple hand full of parts, the talent is obviously here, just read the posts. I see the normal jockeying for position which, can be good thing, as long as you can finish the race and maybe even grab the "golden" ring on the way.

Regards,
Glen
   

[qiman]

Thanks OC, I will continue and you seem to have elected yourself to the steering committee for this thread.

TK, be honest with your work. Do the control with a battery. Put the 10 ohm resistor straight on the battery bank fully charged up. When connecting the resistor, let it go and then start your measurements after it drops to a certain voltage. 24 volts so you're not just on the surface charge. See how long it lasts until it drops to 21 volts.

Even without a side by side test, charge the SAME bank, then hook up the Ainslie circuit, let it go until it hits 24 volts. Then see how long it takes to drop to 21 volts.

You will see that it takes much longer producing the same heat.

That is one simple test that I think you can wrap your head around.

Show the true RMS draw on the shunt. You have the equipment to do that I'm sure. Please show it. It is important.

Anyone can see on that picture that potential is returning to the battery.
http://www.feelthevibe.com/free_energy/rosemary_ainslie/scopeshunt1.jpg

[Gauss]

Anyone fancies a discussion about how to pulse HV(+10 kV on one electrode, the other switched off, then do the inverse) and pull the water molecules from side to side taking advantage of the water dipole in creating steam?

That actually holds a logical base and was called water steam resonator by Stan Meyer.

If you check the history of achievements of the "initiators and FE political people in favour of RM" you might want to reconsider your time priorities...

Blablabla..