Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 447 Guests are viewing this topic.

American

As I've been reading through this thread, I noticed that it was claimed that you can't make the necessary abrupted pulses with an NST and a spark gap.  I haven't had much chance to experiment, and it's been years since my electrical engineering courses in college, (which didn't even come close to covering this stuff), but i think that it's quite feasable, and an NST will actually make it easy to get the wave form right for the abrupted pulses.  You run the output of the NST through a full wave rectifier, and then set the spark gap to fire only at the peak voltage.  Therefore, if f is the output freq of the NST, the spark gap will fire at 2f+(pi/2), giving the following waveform:

core

Quote from: penno64 on November 18, 2010, 12:54:58 AM
@core

How long have you been sitting on this.

I hope this is the kickstart we need.

Thanks

Penno

Penno,

  I believe I sat on that for one hour. I found that quote on the overunityresearch.com forum. It was buried in a forum topic labeled 'Inductors' ??? Given the fact the other forum is comprised of individuals from this forum I figured at one time it must of been posted here.

  There were two things that interested me: (1) The experiments laid out by the individual are similar to what Cosmo has said. (2) The concept of switching polarity on a coil was similar to what I posted awhile back.

   I don't believe everything that has been written in that quote to be correct. For example, when I ran Cosmo's experiment of wrapping the HV wire around the core material I had some issues. The first problem I had, and maybe the biggest, was 'bleed through' of the HV into the core material. In order to prevent that situation the HV wire used to wrap the core has to be rated for the voltage used. If you used regular 600volt wire you more than likely had major bleed through.

  I don't know if bleed through is desirable for this system. Bleed through can be prevented by utilizing the correct HV wire with the correct voltage rating. If you are not using the correct high voltage wire type then the core material has to be well insulated with industrial rubber tape built up to about 3/8". Another way for me was to use multiple layer of cotton cloth. Each layer secured with general electrical tape. Looking at the SR video it does not appear he is using rubber tape or cotton cloth. It also can, from the video, that he is not using appropriate HV wire. To see the effects of bleed through of the HV go to my YouTube page. I have a video using A.C. and D.C. I can generate a spark from inside the core material. Again I don't know if that is a desired affect.

  Having stated the above I am under the impression that the HV wire that is feed via 'Spark Gap' gets coiled 'inside' the core material. This has some benefits. (A) Coiling the wire inside allows you to utilize the ferrite as a shield. Then a couple wraps of plain electrical tape prevents HV bleeding into the other coils. (B) The HV creates an enormous electric field but in this case it propagates from 'inside' the core material. I don't know yet what additional effect this will have. I do believe that the HV 'relaxes' the domains in the ferrite material. If relaxed less effort is needed to rotate them.  ???

   As for the building the core with rings. Here are my yet to be proven thoughts. I think the ferrite rings have to be separated, lets say somewhere in the middle. So if you are using 20 rings glue 10 of then together, add a rubber gasket for separation, then glue the rest together. This design could prove to be advantageous. Basically we create an antenna. What is also interesting about this design is that if I have one side magnetized to (N - S) from left to right the other side should be (N - S) the also but a separate magnet. This should occur due to the section of insulation rubber added in the core design. Also with the high voltage wire 'coiled' on the inside the full length we get the benefit of 'relaxation' across the entire core material.

   Working on the theory that the HV makes it easier to 'rotate' the magnetic domains we should end up with an interesting effect. Lets review the effect created.
   Going back to the 'split core' design if on the left hand core we wire a coil. We feed a 60hz or 50hz signal into it we get a changing magnetic field on the 'left' side of the core. Due to the rubber insulation splitting the core the magnetic field generated by our 'drive' coil will terminate at the rubber. The right side of the core material would react to the alternating magnetic field on the left. So the 'left' magnetic field creates an affect on the 'right' side of the core. The 'right' side of the core is known as the 'driven' side'. If I wrap a coil around the 'driven side' I now have what I call an 'auto-generator' Meaning an equal  reaction to what is occurring on the 'drive' side. The essence is that I am moving a magnet through a coil creating a voltage on the driven side.
   So the amount of power available on the driven side of the coil would have to be in proportion to what is injected into the drive coil. This fall's inline with what Cosmo stated 'you can not get out more then you put in'.

   What I just outlined is nothing more then speculation though I must say that it is very compelling. Nothing stated above is fact unless it is experimented with. Actually the only truth was the section regarding the 'bleed through' of the HV. I will have to run some experiments and report back.

Respectfully,

Core

core

Quote from: penno64 on November 18, 2010, 05:46:16 AM

........... I am getting much better results now, understanding somethings from core's post earlier.


Regards, Penno

p.s. thanks core

What exactly did I say that 'had you at hello'?

Respectfully,

Core

poynt99

Quote from: core on November 18, 2010, 09:32:26 AM
Penno,

  I believe I sat on that for one hour. I found that quote on the overunityresearch.com forum. It was buried in a forum topic labeled 'Inductors' ??? Given the fact the other forum is comprised of individuals from this forum I figured at one time it must of been posted here.


Respectfully,

Core

Core, this was also posted in April 2010 by Omnibus here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7679.msg238192#msg238192

I've moved that OUR thread from "Inductors" to the appropriate Kapanadze thread here:
http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=237.0

.99
question everything, double check the facts, THEN decide your path...

Simple Cheap Low Power Oscillators V2.0
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=248
Towards Realizing the TPU V1.4: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=217
Capacitor Energy Transfer Experiments V1.0: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=209

scratchrobot

I don't want to bring more confusion but i think i found a link thanks to Cosmo's post about the Hydrosystem. Both the electrical and the mechanical system of Kapanadze must use the same concept so i googled around and found some interesting stuff about the hydro pump.
I will post the some links for you to read:
Pendulum hydro pump concept
A NEW BEGINNING FOR THERMODYNAMICS
Notice the last pdf about Magistor Technology on this one:
Hydristor Technology

What do you think?