Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 280 Guests are viewing this topic.

jbignes5

Quote from: Zeitmaschine on May 20, 2012, 10:00:08 AM
I'm using a HV-Transformer from LCD-TV back light inverter, currently driven by a Darlington BD645 and XR-2206 at 225KHz. This creates exactly the same purple noiseless tiny spark as seen in the Kapanadze videos. Nevertheless, the BD645 gets hot and needs a heat sink. Using a fan is not a mistake either. I think this is because the spark gap essentially behaves like a short circuit on the transformers high voltage coil.

Concerning Kapanadze's 9V battery: How do we know this is not a trick? Powering up all the modules and stuff (and empty capacitors) in the transparent box by means of a small 9V block? What is the little silver box for? Maybe this box contains an additional accumulator (recharged when the device is running) only triggered by the 9V battery in order to make it look more interesting.

Regards


What happens when you put two small neo's in attraction mode on either side of the spark gap? It sounds like you are almost there for developing the energy needed. Once you try the neo's you could also try the diodes to force the transistor to work in a one way feed back loop. The 9v was to charge the cap so that he didn't have to let it run up. This thing acts like a motor. The diodes allow for a feed back from the HV circuit to recharge the cap instantly, well near instantly. That could be done via the negative response you get when pulsing coils.
So you would have a cap as the running source and boost it into running mode so that it can gather inertia in the fields quicker. Disconnecting the battery from the cap will still allow for operation based on the pulse returning. Even if you increase the cap negatively it still creates a separation of the plates electrically. Caps don't store current they store electric field. Depending on the resistance of the tube(wire) will result in the explosive nature of the field.


What you have is a good beginning. Keep going with it and make sure you check the real heat value as you go on your transistor. If the heat drops as you are doing your experiments and adding newer parts and the input hasn't changed you are moving in the right direction. Maybe replacing your transistors with the mag amp would allow you to break the reliance on silicon. Silicon is not hearty enough or has way to much resistance. In this case resistance=heat loss. Changing the mag amp to bifilar wound will allow the input of signal without inductive resistance as well. Then the only thing to do is parallel the input bifilar till the real resistance lowers to near nothing. Maybe a bifilar channel for the load pulse could also be used?? I doubt that will work but who knows.

wattsup

@all

Some observations:

Tent Video with big Tesla type coils.

1) The top of the Tesla Coils wire from each coil stack is going to the capacitor/ignitor (whatever) banks. There are three banks of four.
2) From the bank, wires go to the silver metal boxes.
3) From the silver boxes there are output wires green that go to the three main output shunts.
4) From the output shunt is connected a three phase motor. The 3-phase motor is showing two things.
a) There is enough power to run the motor without a load.
b) The output is perfectly 3-phased otherwise at out of phase output would have made that motor run very erratically if not at all.
So all three outputs have to be synchronized in some manner for the motor to turn.

Green box and 2004 videos.

1) If the two mosfets only receive two wires, it would be crazy to use the mosfet as a simple fast acting diode with source/drain since they could have used standard fast acting diodes for that, but it could be used as a diode in reverse for the reverse threshold characteristics and still produce a switching that does not require the gate to be energized. This type of switching would be more like a voltage chopper or a glorified zener diode and not a circuit pulse energizer. I had eluded to this many times in the past that the reverse threshold of a mosfet could be used as a switching method that would not require a gate timing but would be directly relative to the speed at which the voltage rises. But some say this would ruin the mosfet. It may ruin the mosfet for regular mosfet use but maybe not the reverse threshold capability.

General observations or questions;

1) What is HV? It is a very reactive power type that has little amperage.
2) What does a light bulb need? It needs lower voltage at higher amperage (LVHA).
3) How can we obtain a transfer from HV to LVHA.
a) Step down transformers would have to be compatible to HV and high frequency. Very inefficient creating many losses and possible coil damage.
b) You use a high uF capacitor that would take time for the HV to accumulate and rise to dangerous levels but discharge the capacitor before it gets to that level either by timed intervals or by reverse threshold tactics.

@ronotte

To not take up all your precious time I made a call out to the guys at OUR for some help.

http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=1460.msg23422#msg23422

Only got one answer that was not what I hoped for. (Thanks @Dumped for your candid reply.)

I am still waiting to receive my FOD-3180 otpo's. I made a new circuit as per your diagram but this time I made it with the two mosfets to replace the IRF7307 and everything on terminals so I could easily change things out in case they burn out. Correction, not in case they burn out but when they burn out. lol

If you have time this week, could you please make a diagram showing the proper gate/source/drain connections since I am getting confused.

I tried to use a 6N137 and other optos I found locally but so far nothing is working. But again maybe I am mixing up the mosfets source/drain pnp/npn connections.

@All

Why is it so damn difficult to find an ideal pulse system. One that is robust, flexible, powerful, and can go up to at least 1-5 MHz if not higher. 50 tops. One that can be produced in volume and be sold to OUers around the world.

Over 1MHz my FG defaults to 50% duty so this may be really bad if you need only 10% duty. But at those higher frequencies it seems like the 50% duty is more forgiving, but may be not.

Future success in OU research will only depend on the tools we use today. If this type of circuit is not possible or cannot last more then 10 minutes of variable use, then WTF are we doing anyways.

Pulsing a coil scheme with a fixed frequency rate is like trying to find a needle in a haystack (NHS). You could be 1/4 MHz too high or too low, or 10% to high in duty from discovering a great effect and you will never know it. You will pulse your scheme at this fixed rate, see the effect, maybe not to nice, then shift to another scheme all the while not realizing that some great effects were one layer below or above you. This I know for sure.

You can have 10 different coils in series, but regardless, there will be one frequency you can find that will make them sing in harmony. There is always a frequency that can hold things together. That's what frequencies do.

So if there is no possible way to make such a circuit, then how did TK or SM manage. If they did not have variable frequency capability, how did they manage to find the NHS. They would have had to try out endless resistor, capacitor and coil values. Yes you can make all the best calculations and figure out a fixed base, then test it and measure the results, but you will never know if this was the best driving parameter or method unless you can play with the variables. Once you k now the variables, then building a fixed scheme would make sense, but never before otherwise you are shooting in the dark.

It may be that my only real alternative will be to use a standard TV or computer monitor and just take the HV going to the cathode tube and just put it on my coils. Then I just turn on the TV and could play with the vertical and horizontal controls to see the effects. Hmmmmmm.

wattsup


jbignes5

 "Magnetic amplifiers were important as modulation and control amplifiers in the early development of voice transmission by radio.[2] A magnetic amplifier was used as voice modulator for a 2 kilowatt Alexanderson alternator, and magnetic amplifiers were used in the keying circuits of large high-frequency alternators used for radio communications. Magnetic amplifiers were also used to regulate the speed of Alexanderson alternators to maintain the accuracy of the transmitted radio frequency.[2]
The ability to control large currents with small control power made magnetic amplifiers useful for control of lighting circuits, for stage lighting and for advertising signs. Saturable reactor amplifiers were used for control of power to industrial furnaces.[2] Small magnetic amplifiers were used for radio tuning indicators, control of small motor and cooling fan speed, control of battery chargers.
Magnetic amplifiers were used extensively as the switching element in early switched-mode (SMPS) power supplies,[3] as well as in lighting control. Semiconductor based solid-state switches have largely superseded them, though recently there has been some regained interest in using mag amps in compact and reliable switching power supplies.**** PC ATX power supplies often use mag amps for secondary side voltage regulation.******<Important
Magnetic amplifiers are still used in some arc welders.
Magnetic amplifier transformer cores designed specifically for switch mode power supplies are currently manufactured by several large electromagnetics companies, including Metglas and Mag-Inc.
Magnetic amplifiers can be used for measuring high DC-voltages without direct connection to the high voltage and are therefore still used in the HVDC-technique.
Magnetic amplifiers were used by locomotives to detect wheel slip, until replaced by Hall Effect current transducers. The cables from two traction motors passed through the core of the device. During normal operation the resultant flux was zero as both currents were the same and in opposite directions. The currents would differ during wheel slip, producing a resultant flux that acted as the Control winding, developing a voltage across a resistor in series with the AC winding which was sent to the wheel slip correction circuits."


That was from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_amplifier

Try it you might like it. It is way more configurable and much better resistant to burning out.

I am thinking the jewel thief and the likes use this method to squeeze every last ounce of energy out of a battery. The switch adjusts to the lower voltage and current to levels that silicon would waste to heat. This should tell you about the ability of the mag amp to control any voltage or amperage.

stivep



This guy is to be the one who was holding patent on technology utilized by John Hutchison
transmutation and  antigravity
As we could assume energy is main component of our interest in this area.


Dr. Judy Wood - Where Did the Towers Go?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWjktDuIhR8


Minute 1:07:53
One hour seven minutes 53 seconds


Find this patent by yourself
George Samuel Piggott   !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Wesley

jbignes5




But as Tesla said this is not static it is static like. The problem with static is that it is not polarized. Maybe thats where the Testatika machine had polarizing magnets that the wires ran around changing the static to electric energy I bet. The pictures show magnets like alinico with each polarity N and S having wires coiled around the magnet legs. Could this be a way to convert static to electric phenomena?