Pulsed DC Transformer with Embedded Magnets

[tak22]

Ironic or Irrelevant? 

Take these:

I still fail to see how the JT is related to OU. Yes, it does something, lights a bulb and in
@lasersaber's case for quite a while but where's the OU? No one is doing any measurements let
alone providing energy balance. Why this interest in JT?

Well, what makes you think JT can be a component of a possible OU system? Is there any
particular reason or it's just a hunch? I have seen none so far.

So, the hunch that JT may be an OU device is based on the observation that it can revive dead
batteries. The logic goes -- since the battery is dead there's nothing in it and the JT turns it
into a producer of something and, therefore, will see, time will tell, it may be OU, is that it?
How irrelevant is that question?

I see people getting very excited by what @lasersaber is showing but that's again lighting lamps
for a certain time off of charged capacitors. That may be interesting and practical but where's
the OU to be worth discussin in an OU forum?

Run them through the 'S Mark II Magnetic Ironicizer' translator, and you get this:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I still fail to see how the SMOT is related to OU. Yes, it does something, lifts a steel ball up
a small magnetic incline and drops it, but where's the OU? No one is doing any measurements
let alone providing energy balance. Why this interest in the SMOT?

Well, what makes you think the SMOT can be a component of a possible OU system? Is there
any particular reason or it's just a hunch? I have seen none so far.

So, the hunch that the SMOT may be an OU device is based on the observation that it can lift
and drop a steel ball once. The logic goes -- since the ball is lifted once by magnets the SMOT
turns it into a producer of something and, therefore, will see, time will tell, it may be OU, is that it?
How irrelevant is that question?

I see people getting very excited by a steel ball being lifted up a small magnetic incline and dropped.
That may be interesting and practical but where's the OU to be worth discussin in an OU forum?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

tak

[Omnibus]

Ironic or Irrelevant? 

Take these:

Run them through the 'S Mark II Magnetic Ironicizer' translator, and you get this:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I still fail to see how the SMOT is related to OU. Yes, it does something, lifts a steel ball up
a small magnetic incline and drops it, but where's the OU? No one is doing any measurements
let alone providing energy balance. Why this interest in the SMOT?

Well, what makes you think the SMOT can be a component of a possible OU system? Is there
any particular reason or it's just a hunch? I have seen none so far.

So, the hunch that the SMOT may be an OU device is based on the observation that it can lift
and drop a steel ball once. The logic goes -- since the ball is lifted once by magnets the SMOT
turns it into a producer of something and, therefore, will see, time will tell, it may be OU, is that it?
How irrelevant is that question?

I see people getting very excited by a steel ball being lifted up a small magnetic incline and dropped.
That may be interesting and practical but where's the OU to be worth discussin in an OU forum?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

tak

What's the point all the above? To show everybody you have no clue? All right, you have no clue but you don't need to spam the forum to make it known.

[Omnibus]

By the way, while the SMOT and the magnetic propulsor are the only devices so far which have definitively been proven to be OU devices the Joule Thief and devices similar to it are not as far as the current evidence presented indicates. A possible OU circuit is the RC circuit I studied last summer which I will continue to explore. As I've shown, it is an OU circuit due to internal asymmetries inherent in the theory of electricity itself. So, one desn't even need to do experiments to find out the theoretical basis of such circuits being OU. Another proven OU system is electrolysis of water in an undivided cell. No other devices, other than the listed so far (except for the Steorn motor) have any inkling of being OU systems.

This thread, however, is about electrical devices and more specifically Lawrence's device. Unfortunately, it too hasn't been shown to be an OU device.

[XS-NRG]

Nope have to disagree those are not OU...
who told you that

[Omnibus]

Nope have to disagree those are not OU...
who told you that

Who told you they are not OU?