This device is the real self-running overunity?

[Arthurs]

Thanks everyone

The focus of my analysis of this device the following three, My analysis is not necessarily correct:

1) Can easily rotate the magnet, Maximize the elimination Lenz's law.
2) Role of magnet suspension, Maximize the elimination of gravity and friction.
3) The wings of a plane profile shape rotor, Generation rising force, Elimination rotor of gravity and friction.

My English is not good, Hope that we can understand what I mean.

[Arthurs]

Just wondering how many of the guys replicating this and reporting failure are actually using magnetic bearings - none I bet!  My limited experience playing with these taught me that while they are a b1tch to set up, 'normal' bearings seem stuck in treacle by comparison! So if there is an 'effect' here, I don't think normal bearing will do.

Our idea is very similar!
If you do use the three focus my analysis,  Maximum to avoid, Lenz's law,gravity and friction, This device perhaps really can produce miracles.

[markdansie]

@ Arthurs
The wing to eliminate the forces actually needs eergy to create the lift to overcome the air resistance. Otherwise planes would not need motors. the faster it spins he more energy it needs.
Mark

[helicoil]

don't understand why he uses wings in the design, goes through all the trouble, in using frictionless bearings
wouldn't the air resistance on the wing be greater than the bearings friction.

[gauschor]

@Arthur: Great detailed sketch/investigation, this must be it!

One needs appropriate magnet parts though, especially the magnet bearings, because as Sprocket said...

Just wondering how many of the guys replicating this  and reporting failure are actually using magnetic bearings - none I  bet!

...I'm afraid with common ball bearings (which I'd have at home though...) the experiment would probably fail.

@helicoil: Th3G3nerator says he uses wings, because it stabilizes the spinning of the rotor. Otherwise it would stutter etc.