Confirming the Delayed Lenz Effect

[Jack Noskills]

I meant the electric currents would cancel if only single output so zero power, flux of course would stay.

I have played with two secondarys sharing the same core and they can be connected together. One way they cancel as expected but the other way they add up. Same stuff but just opposite phase. When power was taken voltage also increased, I verified this with third coil that was in the same core with the other two. Third was not connected to anything, just for measuring purposes.

So my test setup was such that primary created the flux, this went on to two secondaries. When power was taken the 'backward' flux of one secondary feeded the other. Also some of it went to primary of course but there was alternate path between secondaries which enabled this feedback to be more efficient.

[Jack Noskills]

With my testing when I got 1.86 COP from a trafo I realised that the amount of COP over 1 was related to area of core that was on the alternate path between secondaries. It was about the same size as area that was in the primary so it makes perfect sense.

[i_ron]

@baroutologos,

What is your problem? Why be so negative? Of Course giving criticism is an easy way to go. But really trying to change something and benefit mankind in the future will require some hard work. If you are not interested in Thane's work, then why do you read this thread? Please give motivated people some room to discuss there findings.

snip

And with kind Regards, Overunityguide

Far from being negative, Baroutologos is a serious hands on experimenter. What he is reporting has been verified through experiment. He speaks the truth. I have verified these same experiments and confirm his work.

What this list needs is more good people like Baroutologos who are not afraid of the truth and are willing to speak out! 

It is interesting that the two people with questionable unproven technologies should be so quick to castigate my friend.

Ron

[CRANKYpants]

Far from being negative, Baroutologos is a serious hands on experimenter. What he is reporting has been verified through experiment. He speaks the truth. I have verified these same experiments and confirm his work. What this list needs is more good people like Baroutologos who are not afraid of the truth and are willing to speak out!  It is interesting that the two people with questionable unproven technologies should be so quick to castigate my friend.Ron

SOME THINGS NEVER CHANGE... 

"What we think determines what happens to us, so if we want to change our lives, we need to stretch our minds" ~ Wayne Dyer

[CRANKYpants]

Far from being negative, Baroutologos is a serious hands on experimenter. What he is reporting has been verified through experiment.

AND EVERYONE CAN FIND IT WHERE?

He speaks the truth. I have verified these same experiments and confirm his work.

WHICH EVERYONE CAN FIND WHERE?

What this list needs is more good people like Baroutologos who are not afraid of the truth and are willing to speak out!

SPEAK OUT AGAINST WHAT EXACTLY?

It is interesting that the two people with questionable unproven technologies should be so quick to castigate my friend.

Ron

OK HERE IS PROOF...

1) CONVENTIONAL GENERATOR COILS CREATE "MAGNETIC FRICTION" ARMATURE REACTION COUNTER TORQUE AS EXPLAINED IN LENZ'S LAW WHICH SATISFY NEWTON'S THIRD LAW... "FOR EVERY ACTION THERE IS AN EQUAL AND OPPOSITE REACTION."

THE PROOF OF THIS CAN BE SEEN HERE: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jYi2OyS5cK4
AND HERE: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lGstOJ4NDQQ

...AND THE FACT IS LENZ'S LAW HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH CORES, HYSTERESIS OR COGGING TORQUE ETC BECAUSE LENZ'S LAW STILL APPLIES IN AIR CORE AXIAL FLUX GENERATORS. ANYONE WHO SUGGESTS OTHERWISE IS EITHER IGNORANT OR DELIBERATELY MISLEADING PEOPLE - WHICH IS NOT NEW ON THESE FORUMS.

2) THE REGENERATIVE ACCELERATION GENERATOR COILS CREATE MAGNETIC ASSISTANCE COMPLIMENTARY TORQUE WHICH IS ALSO EVIDENT IN THE SAME VIDEOS ABOVE.

3) THE IEEE ACCEPTED EQUATION FOR HOW MUCH DRIVE SHAFT TORQUE IS REQUIRED TO PRODUCE 1 WATT OF POWER AT 3000 RPM IS:

Torque (Nm) = KW x 9550/RPM

SO 0.003 Nm OF EXTRA TORQUE IS REQUIRED TO SUPPLY 1 WATT OF POWER AT 3000 RPM. IN ANY GENERATOR SYSTEM ON THE PLANET EARTH.

NOTE: EXTRA TORQUE IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE 1 WATT OR 1 MILLION WATTS OF POWER IN A CONVENTIONAL GENERATOR SYSTEM.

HOWEVER IN THE REGENERATIVE ACCELERATION GENERATOR (RM) PARADIGM NO EXTRA TORQUE IS REQUIRED IN FACT IF A STEADY STATE SPEED OF 3000 RPM IS DESIRED WHEN USING THE RM COILS THEN THE DRIVE SHAFT TORQUE MUST ACTUALLY BE REDUCED BECAUSE THE RM CREATES ITS OWN TORQUE.

THIS WAS INDEPENDENTLY PROVEN BY NRC SCIENTIST DOUG HARTWICK AT OTTAWA UNIVERSITY (DATA ATTACHED) AND FOR MAGNA INTERNATIONAL (DATA ATTACHED).

NRC TEST DATA SHOW:

1)A 12% INCREASE IN PRIME MOVER INPUT TO SUPPLY POWER TO A 10 OHM LOAD IN A CONVENTIONAL GENERATOR SYSTEM.

2) A 40% DECREASE IN PRIME MOVER INPUT IS REQUIRED IN THE REGENERATIVE ACCELERATION GENERATOR MODE TO SUPPLY 223% MORE POWER TO THE SAME 10 LOAD AT THE SAME RPM FROM TEST #1 ABOVE. Running the tests at the same RPM ensures that the induction motor is operating at the same efficiency.

3) 0.00 WATTS OF OUTPUT FROM THE CONVENTIONAL GENERATOR WITH THE SAME PRIME MOVER INPUT AS TEST #2 ABOVE.

CONCLUSIONS:

4) THE RM GENERATOR PRODUCES 4 WATTS OF POWER TO THE LOAD.

5) WITH THE SAME PRIME MOVER INPUT THE CONVENTIONAL GENERATOR PRODUCES 0.00 WATTS.

6) THE PERFORMANCE ADVANTAGE OF THE RM COIL vs THE CONVENTIONAL GENERATOR COIL IS INFINITE%.

MAGNA INTERNATIONAL TORQUE TEST SHOW:

7) A 10.6% DECREASE IN DRIVE SHAFT TORQUE WHEN A CONVENTIONAL GENERATOR COIL SUPPLIES POWER TO THE GRID WITH A FIXED PRIME MOVER INPUT.

A 6.5% INCREASE IN DRIVE SHAFT TORQUE WHEN THE RM COIL DELIVERS 21.6% MORE POWER TO THE GRID WITH THE SAME PRIME MOVER INPUT AS ABOVE IN #7.

OVERALL RM CONCLUSIONS:

AS THE OUTPUT POWER DELIVERED TO A LOAD IS INCREASED TO INFINITY IN A CONVENTIONAL GENERATOR SYSTEM - THE INPUT POWER TO THE PRIME MOVER MUST ALSO BE INCREASED TO INFINITY AS WELL.

AS THE OUTPUT POWER TO A LOAD IS INCREASED TO INFINITY IN A REGENERATIVE ACCELERATION GENERATOR SYSTEM THE INPUT CAN BE DECREASED TO ZERO.

CHEERS
T

Thane C. Heins
President
Potential +/- Difference Inc. R & D
"The Transition of Power"
thaneh@potentialdifference.ca
Linkedin http://linkd.in/iIZyXF
YouTube http://bit.ly/gCRePU

"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts."
Daniel Patrick Moynihan


NRC AND MAGNA INTERNATIONAL TEST DATA ATTACHMENTS BELOW: