quentron.com

[profitis]

A)nope.i win. B)nope. textbooks support wikipedia which supports eternal batteries. C)nope D)nope. WE THE AUDIENCE DEMAND THAT YOU PROVIDE A SCIENTIST TO UPHOLD KELVIN STATEMENT IN THE WIKIPEDIA BATTERY.you want to lose respect in the audience?nows your chance to save yourself.E)im dead serious. F)WE THE AUDIENCE DEMAND THAT YOU PROVIDE A SCIENTIST TO UPHOLD KELVIN STATEMENT IN THE WIKIPEDIA BATTERY.. @sarkeizen.or you rapidly lose respect and make people start to realy pay attention here at this thread.(you must remember that one of my diagrammed wikipedia-type batteries is high-powered enough to power an ipod eternaly in a size compatible with ipods.people want to know wtf is going on now,they want answers)

[sarkeizen]

A)nope.i win.

Hard to believe.  You are refusing to support your point but don't let me stop you from being stupid.

B)nope. textbooks support wikipedia which supports eternal batteries.

If so, you have not provided and now appear to refuse to provide any evidence to support this imaginary assertion of yours. 

C)nope

Sadly, logic says you're wrong.  Again if you want to be stupid, be my quest. 

D)nope. WE THE AUDIENCE DEMAND THAT YOU PROVIDE A SCIENTIST TO UPHOLD KELVIN STATEMENT IN THE WIKIPEDIA BATTERY.

So are you saying: "No I, profits don't understand how stupid I'm being?"  Again, all you have to do is agree with that statement and I'll explain.  However if you just want to be an obstructionist asshole.  Well I guess that's your choice.

Or should I assume that your constant avoidance of the question means you actually do understand how stupid you are being?

people want to know wtf is going on now,they want answers

Something you are very much committed not to provide.  You have lied several times, you won't provide a formal argument, you have provided only one unverified cite and you won't even define your terms.   Clearly you are the opposite of someone who wants to provide answers.

[profitis]

A)my point IS the wikipedia battery and i am supporting it by asking you to un-support it which you obviously cannot do.B) if it,s imaginery why can you not describe kelvins role in it,yet i can?this is your way to restore the public,s confidence in you? C)sadly this is limited to your own logic. D)dont insult the public @sarkeizen.they just want you to make provision to uphold an important statement in physics for certain wikipedia phenomena.E)yeah but you forgot to mention my dirty habit of winning arguments by getting encyclopedias involved,by DEMANDING THAT YOU UPHOLD KELVIN,S LAW IN THAT WIKIPEDIA BATTERY @sarkeizen.cmon,crush me and my statement,the one about ipods.should be a breeze :-)       

[markdansie]

I drop in to check this thread sometimes, any progress other than a lot of rhetoric musings?
Kind Regards
Mark

[orbut 3000]

I drop in to check this thread sometimes, any progress other than a lot of rhetoric musings?
Kind Regards
Mark

PJH is very angry because nobody wants to buy a 'Sebby' for $5000. He has deleted his website again.