Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[antijon]

@forest
lol, it wouldn't surprise me if someone in Spain had a Figuera generator in their basement.

@NRamaswami
Don't confuse back EMF, or counter EMF, with inductive "kickback". Kickback is what happens when you power a coil then quickly stop the voltage, or try to pull the connection off. This is also an effect of Lenz law. AC devices like transformers never produce kickback. Back EMF can be easily demonstrated by powering a coil with a battery, then swiping a magnet over the top. If the coil is North at the top, and you swipe a South magnet towards it current will drop. Swiping a North magnet towards it will cause an increase in current.

Lenz law is present in every coil with a magnetic field.

@MagnaProp
I can draw a picture when I get home from work this evening, but everything I said is only relevant to parallel inductors. If the coils are on the same inductor it will not behave the same.

[marathonman]

Hello every one,
I found the Rotating Dynamo Picture and will post the link to it. it is actually a Rotating Ring Unipolar Alternator.
below is the pic and here is the link
https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015038749308;view=1up;seq=180

please look at the coil wiring cw ccw cw ccw.... i told ya!

[antijon]

@MagnaProp
This is my simple drawing, please excuse my lack-ability. This is a parallel winding configuration. Two outside coils are inducers, central secondary is induced.

I forgot the page, but hanon had a good image of the wave produced by the commutator. In this setup, Lenz current would lower input current when the coils are driven by out-of-phase current. Also, every time one coil dimishes while the other increases, the secondary output will change polarity.

And, if you can imagine the secondary rotating in the frame, and the coils powered by DC, this is an AC generator. Figuera's commutator provides electrical rotation, so the secondary is stationary.

[MagnaProp]

@MagnaProp
This is my simple drawing...

Thanks for the image and the info. Its helped me to understand it better.

[hanon]

Antijon, Your design is the same as bajac design. I think he tested it largely without any result. Anyway this configuration has nothing to see with Figuera´s 1902 design and Buforn images


Figuera 1902 patent no. 30378 ---> two electromagnets one in front of each other and the induced coil in the center[/size]

Figuera 1902 patent no. 30378 ----> two electromagnets one in front of each other and the induced coil in the center[/size]

Figuera 1908 patent no. 44267 ---> No drawn. We do not know it for sure

Buforn 1910 patent      ---> No drawn. We do not know it for sure. An exact copy of the Figuera´s 1908 design

Buforn 1911-1914 patents (4 patents) ---> two electromagnets one in front of each other and the induced coil in the center[/size]


Guess which is the more problable configuration for the 1908 patent...let me think....


IMHO we can compose all the information in all the patent to know the general arrangement of the device. Antijon, your proposal is basically a three phase transformer. I do not see any similarity with any patent description. I think it would be better if you follow the arrangement explained in the 1914 Buforn´s patent which is the more detailed one


Image attached from patent 30378:     a , b are the electromagnets ; c is the place for the induced