Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[bistander]

...
Truth be told, ...

IMIGHTKNOW,
More than one member here thinks you are the person a.k.a. marathonman. Are you?
bi

[floodrod]

I think I made some Big Progress..  I went over the patent line by line looking for clues and came across these 2 statements:

"Let be "R" a resistance that is drawn in an elementary manner to facilitate the comprehension of the entire system"

and--   "whose current, after completing their task in the different electromagnets, returns to the source where it was taken."

First observation is that the resistor coils are an "elementary drawing" for understanding.  But obviously his were something else. or doing something else.

Second-  Why was it so important to specifically say " current returns to the source where it was taken" in Clemente's and Buforns patents?? ..  Seems a little weird to keep saying that..  And we all assume it means goes from positive to negative..

Then it hit me- the resistors need to be able to collect energy and return that energy to the positive terminal where the current was taken.  Then any Lenz from pulling power from the induced coil will transfer back to the transformer resistors where it will all be recovered back to the positive terminal by means of the transformer secondaries..

So there is "No Lenz"  because we are recovering lenz from the transformer resistors!  As the input goes UP from Lenz- the recovery from the transformers go UP as the same rate..

So I rigged it up..  8 make-b4-break terminals on 7 step-up transformers..  I got alternating AC output on the induced, and when I short the induced, the amperage output on the resistor electromagnets goes up...

Basically I summarize there is "No Lenz" because we are collecting it on the resistor transformers..  The waxing / waning action in the transformer string sets up a situation where the Lenz can be recovered.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Of_ZXdU2DLU

[forest]

Consider "egg of Columbus" as a very valuable tip Figuera gave us. Two kinds of induction, each having own problems, each being COP < 1 Figuera found how to solve problems,  he just eliminated cause of problems like
break the egg shell

[floodrod]

----

[IMIGHTKNOW]

I think I made some Big Progress..  I went over the patent line by line looking for clues and came across these 2 statements:

"Let be "R" a resistance that is drawn in an elementary manner to facilitate the comprehension of the entire system"

and--   "whose current, after completing their task in the different electromagnets, returns to the source where it was taken."

First observation is that the resistor coils are an "elementary drawing" for understanding.  But obviously his were something else. or doing something else.

Second-  Why was it so important to specifically say " current returns to the source where it was taken" in Clemente's and Buforns patents?? ..  Seems a little weird to keep saying that..  And we all assume it means goes from positive to negative..

Then it hit me- the resistors need to be able to collect energy and return that energy to the positive terminal where the current was taken.  Then any Lenz from pulling power from the induced coil will transfer back to the transformer resistors where it will all be recovered back to the positive terminal by means of the transformer secondaries..

So there is "No Lenz"  because we are recovering lenz from the transformer resistors!  As the input goes UP from Lenz- the recovery from the transformers go UP as the same rate..

So I rigged it up..  8 make-b4-break terminals on 7 step-up transformers..  I got alternating AC output on the induced, and when I short the induced, the amperage output on the resistor electromagnets goes up...

Basically I summarize there is "No Lenz" because we are collecting it on the resistor transformers..  The waxing / waning action in the transformer string sets up a situation where the Lenz can be recovered.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Of_ZXdU2DLU

Floodrod; Considering resistor waste potential in the form of heat what other forms of resistance can there be?. When I was clued into mag amps from a person on another site I realized flux can control current flow. This also can be verified through Tesla's patent turning AC into DC using flux.
An inductor has large amounts of flux available to control current flow yet can be made variable through the use of a rotating brush. This allows the energy to be taken and returned from the system is a near lossless manor.
Lenz is always present no matter what you do yet how to work with lenz effects is the real question???

"Consider "egg of Columbus" as a very valuable tip Figuera gave us"  Very doubtful because that was made concerning the 1902 patent in an interview.

Oh by the way, Nice work, and the fact going line by line! ;DI

I know MM, I have one of his electronic boards he designed to electronically switch part G. Simply flawless design to nanosecond frequency switching with only 38 lines of code. Can you do better bi?