Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[EMJunkie]

Then you must be very disappointed as the replications of your junk flyback circuits have not produced the COPs of 1.7 and 2.5, rather they have produced COPs of less than 25%.LOL, leakage inductance is a feature of the construction.  The circuits are electrically noisy as they generate multi-kV voltage spikes that rise at over 10V/ns.  The circuits are demonstrated: overly complicated and low < 25% efficient flyback converters.  Those are all observations.  Stock circuit theory explains those observations.Poor performing flybacks are a "Technology"?If it what it says sounds like David Berkowitz' dog, then get help.  It is trivial to get much better efficiency by reconfiguring the circuit without the "partnered coils".LOL, well if you want to associate yourself with a dead fraud, then be my guest.  Maybe you can arrange a road trip with Mylow to visit the graves of Stan Meyer and Howard Johnson together.The COP 1.7 and 2.5 claims are yours and they have fallen by the wayside in the face of measured COPs of less than 25%.What would Julia do?  If you haven't noticed your circuit already has resnonant ring-out.  As it is, the resonant ring-out contributes to the poor efficiency of your scheme.  There are clever circuits out there that use resonant or quasi-resonant circuits to reduce switching losses and improve efficiency.  Your junky flyback is not such a case.  Your circuits suffer from excessive:  conduction, switching, and radiation losses versus ordinary flyback circuits found in IC application notes.

What is even more hilarious is that you attempt to stigmatize me by making a false quote attribution to Charles Holland Duell.  The trouble for you is:  He never uttered the quote you attribute, nor is there any credible information that he uttered anything similar.  So, it seems you just happy attributing fantasical beliefs to other people as you are to promoting fantastical physical claims.  Your references are so bad you can't even get his name right.

Hahahahahaha - MarkE Hollande Duell youre so funny!



Nice work in consulting your Dictionary!

[Void]

Hi TK. If a person were looking to try to create a self runner, they of course must
take into account all energy input into their entire system, and all power consumption
in that system. That is a given. However, any part of a system can be black boxed. It can then
be viewed as a 'system' itself. Energy 'consumed' in the system should never exceed energy input
into the system. Isolating a particular part of a larger system can be quite useful in getting a better understanding of that part.
For example, analyzing each individual stage in a multi-stage amplifier, separately, to measure the efficiency
of each individual stage to look for places to possibly make efficiency improvements, or whatever.
All perfectly normal, and can provide very useful info.

Currently however I am just running some very basic tests and making some basic rough measurements, and making
some observations. I think I have made it clear enough that I am not attempting to draw any conclusions from a
single informal test or two, especially under the conditions of those two particular tests. Just observing and
taking a few notes as I go, then thinking about what could be an interesting or useful next step. Then on to the
next test. All part of the fun.

All the best...

[MarkE]

Hahahahahaha - MarkE Hollande Duell youre so funny!



Nice work in consulting your Dictionary!

Really?  This is really the best retort that you can muster?  Is this your best effort to distract from the fact that you have offered no evidence to support your COP 1.7 and COP 2.5 claims, while replicators are getting less than 25%?  Why should anyone be embarrassed or offended that you would try to associate them with the esteemed Mr. Duell?  It is your mistake that you attribute to him a quote he never uttered.  Are you in such bad shape that when the facts don't fit your desires you just substitute fantasies?

[MarkE]

Hi TK. If a person were looking to try to create a self runner, they of course must
take into account all energy input into their entire system, and all power consumption
in that system. That is a given. However, any part of a system can be black boxed. It can then
be viewed as a 'system' itself. Energy 'consumed' in the system should never exceed energy input
into the system. Isolating a particular part of a larger system can be quite useful in getting a better understanding of that part.
For example, analyzing each individual stage in a multi-stage amplifier, separately, to measure the efficiency
of each individual stage to look for places to possibly make efficiency improvements, or whatever.
All perfectly normal, and can provide very useful info.

Currently however I am just running some very basic tests and making some basic rough measurements, and making
some observations. I think I have made it clear enough that I am not attempting to draw any conclusions from a
single informal test or two, especially under the conditions of those two particular tests. Just observing and
taking a few notes as I go, then thinking about what could be an interesting or useful next step. Then on to the
next test. All part of the fun.

All the best...

I agree.

[EMJunkie]

Really?  This is really the best retort that you can muster?  Is this your best effort to distract from the fact that you have offered no evidence to support your COP 1.7 and COP 2.5 claims, while replicators are getting less than 25%?  Why should anyone be embarrassed or offended that you would try to associate them with the esteemed Mr. Duell?  It is your mistake that you attribute to him a quote he never uttered.  Are you in such bad shape that when the facts don't fit your desires you just substitute fantasies?

@MarkE Hollande Duell - When you're smart enough to realise and see it, you will see I have already shown OU, its right in front of you and you cant see it because you're not smart enough to see it 

A small clip of it is here: http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=2760.msg45771#msg45771

I know where Energy comes from.

I know How it is "Generated"

I know I have shared enough for others to pick the ball up.

MarkE Holland Duell, you may be a smart bloke, but I must say, you're not smart  enough to really know what's going on with these Technologies, I hope you can soon understand what is really going on.

Regards

   Chris