Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[gotoluc]

Hi everyone,

if any of you are interested in my motor research, I've started a new topic and also have released all my unlisted video experiments to public viewing.

Also, the new motor I'll be building will be using coil flyback to assist and Bucking field coils.

Link to Moderated topic: http://overunity.com/16167/sharing-ideas-on-how-to-make-a-more-efficent-motor-using-flyback-moderated/msg465459/#msg465459

Kind regards

Luc

[MileHigh]

MH says we need only go to the second decimal.
So the electron has 0.00 of an atomic mass unit--there for it is non existent.

Nope, I don't recall ever saying that.   What I said was for a hand-held stopwatch there is only a single significant digit to the right of the decimal place when measuring seconds and all other figures after that are junk.   Anybody that wants to crunch numbers needs to understand the concept of the number of significant digits in a measurement and error tolerances.

In a semi-related matter, it's a shame that nobody wants to try to measure the average torque output of their pulse motors at a given RPM and strive for the most torque per input watt.  You can find a website and just punch in the numbers, I am pretty sure.  Pulse motors are a dead end if people just build them, watch them spin, and measure the current consumption and RPM.

I went to the top of a mountain and I screamed out, "2.718281828459045235360287471352662497757247093699959574966967627724076630353
  547594571382178525166427427466391932003059921817413596629043572900334295260
  595630738132328627943490763233829880753195251019011573834187930702154089149
  934884167509244761460668082264800168477411853742345442437107539077744992069
  551702761838606261331384583000752044933826560297606737113200709328709127443
  747047230696977209310141692836819025515108657463772111252389784425056953696
  770785449969967946864454905987931636889230098793127736178215424999229576351
  482208269895193668033182528869398496465105820939239829488793320362509443117
  301238197068416140397019837679320683282376464804295311802328782509819455815
  301756717361332069811250996181881593041690351598888519345807273866738589422
  879228499892086805825749279610484198444363463244968487560233624827041978623
  209002160990235304369941849146314093431738143640546253152096183690888707016
  768396424378140592714563549061303107208510383750510115747704171898610687396
  965521267154688957035035402123407849819334321068170121005627880235193033224
  745015853904730419957777093503660416997329725088687696640355570716226844716
  256079882651787134195124665201030592123667719432527867539855894489697096409
  754591856956380236370162112047742722836489613422516445078182442352948636372
  141740238893441247963574370263755294448337998016125492278509257782562092622
  648326277933386566481627725164019105900491644998289315056604725802778631864
  155195653244258698294695930801915298721172556347546396447910145904090586298
  496791287406870504895858671747985466775757320568128845920541334053922000113
  786300945560688166740016984205580403363795376452030402432256613527836951177
  883863874439662532249850654995886234281899707733276171783928034946501434558
  897071942586398772754710962953741521115136835062752602326484728703920764310
  059584116612054529703023647254929666938115137322753645098889031360205724817
  658511806303644281231496550704751025446501172721155519486685080036853228183!"

[minnie]

  I fully agree MileHigh, it's all about relativity.
  Let's call the speed of light 1.
  186,000 squared is too big for me!

[EMJunkie]

Nope, I don't recall ever saying that.   What I said was for a hand-held stopwatch there is only a single significant digit to the right of the decimal place when measuring seconds and all other figures after that are junk.   Anybody that wants to crunch numbers needs to understand the concept of the number of significant digits in a measurement and error tolerances.

In a semi-related matter, it's a shame that nobody wants to try to measure the average torque output of their pulse motors at a given RPM and strive for the most torque per input watt.  You can find a website and just punch in the numbers, I am pretty sure.  Pulse motors are a dead end if people just build them, watch them spin, and measure the current consumption and RPM.

I went to the top of a mountain and I screamed out, "2.718281828459045235360287471352662497757247093699959574966967627724076630353
  547594571382178525166427427466391932003059921817413596629043572900334295260
  595630738132328627943490763233829880753195251019011573834187930702154089149
  934884167509244761460668082264800168477411853742345442437107539077744992069
  551702761838606261331384583000752044933826560297606737113200709328709127443
  747047230696977209310141692836819025515108657463772111252389784425056953696
  770785449969967946864454905987931636889230098793127736178215424999229576351
  482208269895193668033182528869398496465105820939239829488793320362509443117
  301238197068416140397019837679320683282376464804295311802328782509819455815
  301756717361332069811250996181881593041690351598888519345807273866738589422
  879228499892086805825749279610484198444363463244968487560233624827041978623
  209002160990235304369941849146314093431738143640546253152096183690888707016
  768396424378140592714563549061303107208510383750510115747704171898610687396
  965521267154688957035035402123407849819334321068170121005627880235193033224
  745015853904730419957777093503660416997329725088687696640355570716226844716
  256079882651787134195124665201030592123667719432527867539855894489697096409
  754591856956380236370162112047742722836489613422516445078182442352948636372
  141740238893441247963574370263755294448337998016125492278509257782562092622
  648326277933386566481627725164019105900491644998289315056604725802778631864
  155195653244258698294695930801915298721172556347546396447910145904090586298
  496791287406870504895858671747985466775757320568128845920541334053922000113
  786300945560688166740016984205580403363795376452030402432256613527836951177
  883863874439662532249850654995886234281899707733276171783928034946501434558
  897071942586398772754710962953741521115136835062752602326484728703920764310
  059584116612054529703023647254929666938115137322753645098889031360205724817
  658511806303644281231496550704751025446501172721155519486685080036853228183!"

MileHigh,

and if you were to scream out:

2.718281828459045235360287471352662497757247093699959574966967627724076630353
   547594571382178525166427427466391932003059921817413596629043572900334295260
   595630738132328627943490763233829880753195251019011573834187930702154089149
   934884167509244761460668082264800168477411853742345442437107539077744992069
   551702761838606261331384583000752044933826560297606737113200709328709127443
   747047230696977209310141692836819025515108657463772111252389784425056953696
   770785449969967946864454905987931636889230098793127736178215424999229576351
   482208269895193668033182528869398496465105820939239829488793320362509443117
   301238197068416140397019837679320683282376464804295311802328782509819455815
   301756717361332069811250996181881593041690351598888519345807273866738589422
   879228499892086805825749279610484198444363463244968487560233624827041978623
   209002160990235304369941849146314093431738143640546253152096183690888707016
   768396424378140592714563549061303107208510383750510115747704171898610687396
   965521267154688957035035402123407849819334321068170121005627880235193033224
   745015853904730419957777093503660416997329725088687696640355570716226844716
   256079882651787134195124665201030592123667719432527867539855894489697096409
   754591856956380236370162112047742722836489613422516445078182442352948636372
   141740238893441247963574370263755294448337998016125492278509257782562092622
   648326277933386566481627725164019105900491644998289315056604725802778631864
   155195653244258698294695930801915298721172556347546396447910145904090586298
   496791287406870504895858671747985466775757320568128845920541334053922000113
   786300945560688166740016984205580403363795376452030402432256613527836951177
   883863874439662532249850654995886234281899707733276171783928034946501434558
   897071942586398772754710962953741521115136835062752602326484728703920764310
   059584116612054529703023647254929666938115137322753645098889031360205724817
   658511806303644281231496550704751025446501172721155519486685080036853228188

Would not this be different?

Really the IEEE have a standard for a Double Precision Number: IEEE 754-1985 - approx. 15 decimal digits

Why would we have such a thing if we only needed 2 decimal Digits as you have on several occasions made argument for!

...and therefore the second digit past the decimal point is meaningless garbage data.

And we see now that you did make such a NON-Sense Claim! Stating that any digit after the second digit after the decimal point is "meaningless garbage data"

10 to the -24 yocto  y, just another reason to dismiss MileHigh's Non-Sense claims!

0.000000000000000000000001 - Short scale: septillionth - Long scale: quadrillionth - Adopted in 1991

Therefore, Measurement Errors and dismissing a Numbers Significance to a few Decimal places is entirely different things!

After all, it is you that has already pointed out that these very same Measurement Error Margins should be pointed out as a separate figure in the data!

Also, working with your error margins and understanding the number of significant figures in your data is critical and can't be ignored if you are trying to make precise over unity measurements.  Like I said before, high school students will do this in their chemistry and physics lab reports, why can't the people in the free energy community do it when they are talking about very slight over unity measurements?

Here we see that, you, yourself, does not practice what you preach!

   Chris Sykes
       hiyq.org

[EMJunkie]

  I fully agree MileHigh, it's all about relativity.
  Let's call the speed of light 1.
  186,000 squared is too big for me!

Minne - Why agree?

C in the Vacuum is not constant with C in Coaxial Cable!

Try measuring C inside a Black Hole and see how many Double Precision Numbers you need then!

I am sure Our Old Mate Steven Hawking would disagree with your eager urge to agree with MileHigh!!!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org