Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Open Systems

Started by allcanadian, January 25, 2015, 09:23:46 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

tinman

Quote from: MarkE on February 05, 2015, 09:15:18 PM
All it has to do is boil a liquid in a suitable pressure vessel.
An electrolisis cell is a resistance heater-->and we get gas as well ;)

LibreEnergia

Quote from: tinman on February 06, 2015, 05:38:03 AM
An electrolisis cell is a resistance heater-->and we get gas as well ;)

Electrolysis and recombination of water is a lossy process. Expanding a gas to produce work is a lossy process. The environment cannot contribute net energy as this would require a cold sink at lower temperature than the environment. The combination of 2 or more lossy processes multiplies the possible losses. I'm looking hard but I just don't see any useful process here.

Now if by chance work did not raise the amount of heat in a gas I'd be forced to reconsider my position.. All you need to prove is it does not and I'd happily endorse this...

Waiting for proof now :)

tinman

Quote from: LibreEnergia on February 06, 2015, 06:25:24 AM
Electrolysis and recombination of water is a lossy process. Expanding a gas to produce work is a lossy process. The environment cannot contribute net energy as this would require a cold sink at lower temperature than the environment. The combination of 2 or more lossy processes multiplies the possible losses. I'm looking hard but I just don't see any useful process here.

Now if by chance work did not raise the amount of heat in a gas I'd be forced to reconsider my position.. All you need to prove is it does not and I'd happily endorse this...

Waiting for proof now :)
There is no loss when you account for all the energy output of any system-energy must be conserved-->this is one law i do agree with.
The energy stored within the H2O1 gas,plus the heat energy is 100% of the input energy-->COP1.

With the addition of pressure,there are now three energy sources-disipated heat,energy stored within the gas itself,and the pressure-->which in turn is heat energy. The more we raise the pressure,the more heat the cell will produce. This is what i am trying to explain here-the pressure has already been accounted for in the form of heat energy,and we can use this pressure without added cost to the devices input energy.

Anyway,we will go through it step by step,and messure each of the two gas storage tank's energy as the process takes place-providing Mark can nut out the math involved,which is going to be quite complex.

profitis

Libre says:'The environment cannot contribute net energy as this would require a cold sink at lower temperature than the environment'

I say: yes a phase-change sink like h2o> h2 + o2.colder than the environment

profitis

 libre:'electrolysis and recombination of water is a lossy process. Expanding a gas to produce work is a lossy process. The environment cannot contribute net energy'


Me: depends on your setup