Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Rosch taking orders on OU Bouyancy device.

Started by ramset, April 26, 2015, 09:52:03 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 13 Guests are viewing this topic.

tinman

Quote from: MarkE on April 29, 2015, 10:00:18 PM
It is disheartening to see you implode this way.  Complete your project.  Maybe then you will learn.  God knows you have your eyes wide shut right now.
What is disheartening Mark,is when those that you thought were there to help you,are only interested in seeing what you have,and how you are getting the results you are getting when the results seem to defy what they believe in. You were happy with the tests until such time as the results went against your beliefs,then you put up the ultimatum-->show me what you have,or no more measurement calculations-when nothing about the measurements change. We had what we always had-gas pressure,temperature and tank volume.

I havnt stopped doing my test,the only difference now is i have some one else doing the calculations for me-->some one that dosnt need to see the device to calculate given measurements.

The venturi effect dose add energy to a system,and this i have shown in two ways now.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fQkEp0iDGo

MarkE

Quote from: tinman on April 30, 2015, 01:27:06 AM
What is disheartening Mark,is when those that you thought were there to help you,are only interested in seeing what you have,and how you are getting the results you are getting when the results seem to defi what they believe in. You were happy with the tests until such time as the results went against your beliefs,then you put up the ultimatum-->show me what you have,or no more measurement calculations-when nothing about the measurements change. We had what we always had-gas pressure,temperature and tank volume.

I havnt stopped doing my test,the only difference now is i have some one else doing the calculations for me-->some one that dosnt need to see the device to calculate given measurements.

The venturi effect dose add energy to a system,and this i have shown in two ways now.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fQkEp0iDGo
You need to take your experiment to the end.  Generate enough work to return to your starting state with even just a scintilla left over.  Then you will have something remarkable.  What your apparatus does is move energy.  Some of that energy moved is from the local atmosphere.  Such is the operation of a heat pump.  If you are intent on staying warm or trying to cool off, heat pumps can be very useful devices.  If you are intent on performing kinetic work, they don't help.  It seems that the only way that you will learn is to take your experiments to their logical conclusion where you compare useful work done.

MarkE

Quote from: allcanadian on April 29, 2015, 11:47:08 PM
@Mark EScience observes and studies natural phenomena while the inventor uses knowledge and understanding to create what others could not possibly imagine. The inventor makes fantasy reality and this has been proven throughout history. They invented the locomotive, the car, the airplane, the rocket and they will carry on inventing things in the future which others cannot possibly imagine and think is fantasy...that's the way it has been proven to work Mark. Your vote does not count and you don't actually have a say in the future because it is defined by whatever the inventors can dream up and make reality. I understand you have a great sense of self-importance but your nobody until such time as you become part of a solution to make things better in reality. Any fool can tell other people something cannot be done but some inventor somewhere always seems to show people different and this is the way it has always been.
To be honest I find you guys kind of comical because you pretend to be some kind of authority and yet you have absolutely none, you are nobody so far as the future is concerned. People will understand new things and they will invent new things we could not possibly imagine and that is a fact which has been proven throughout our history. Let's put it this way, where do you think we will be 1000 years from now?, I will give you a little hint... based on how far we have come in the last 100 years you and most everything you know will be completely irrelevant and you will be seen in the same light as we look at chimpanzees. Right now due to the exponential growth of knowledge a person enroled in a 4 year university technology program will graduate to find 90% of what they were taught during that time is now obsolete. Put's a whole new spin on things doesn't it?.

AC
Fantasy is not reality.  Fantasy sometimes inspires talented people to develop new and wonderful technologies.  If you do not comprehend the distinction that is unfortunate for you.

sterlinga

Quote from: MarkE on April 30, 2015, 12:57:33 AM
Any physicist that isn't a few eggs short of a dozen will tell you that there is no such thing as "free-fall speed".  There is acceleration due to gravity.  And there is velocity dependent viscous friction with air that changes with atmospheric conditions.  For a given vertical drag coefficient a terminal velocity exists that is reached after falling for a sufficient time.  For skydivers jumping around 10,000' that's about five seconds and almost 1000' drop.

To find out what happened physically to buildings damaged and destroyed at the WTC on 9/11 you could always read the NIST report.  That report was written by knowledgeable people who evaluated the evidence in detail.  And contrary to your evil and unfounded accusations not one of those people is part of the heinous cover-up plot that you allege without a shred of evidence.  You accuse those people of being part of a plot to cover up the murder of thousands of their country mates.  Consider how you will explain the false witness you've born and continue to bear when you eventually face your creator.

Okay, so you're also among the "show me the data" crowd who believe the "official" 9/11 lies. Pathetic.

Building 7 came down in classic demolition manner. Anyone can see that. No college degree required.
http://freeenergynews.com and http://peswiki.com
"The best cutting-edge, clean energy news and directory service on the net."

sterlinga

Quote from: MarkE on April 30, 2015, 01:24:35 AM
You have been taken in by SHT just as badly as you were taken in by Mylow.  The third party tests performed for SHT did not establish an input / output energy balance.  They did not establish their claim that they convert water to hydrogen gram for gram.  The test reports published reported on:  1) Electricity supply to the unit under test, 2) Gas outflow volume, and 3) Chemical analysis of the outflow. 

What you seem to gloss over every time is that SHT's device uses a metal consummable that they admit is part of an oxidation reduction reaction evolving hydrogen.  That admission alone kills the gram for gram water to hydrogen claim, independent of the absurdity of the notion that they would transmute an oxygen atom consisting of 8 N, 8P, 8e to 16 hydrogen atoms of 1P + 1e each.  All fission for elements lighter than iron is energetically unfavorable.  That means that if SHT's claims were true, the energy value of hydrogen to oxidize  would be many orders of magnitude smaller than the nuclear energy imparted to fission the oxygen.  SHT's crack team would have you believe that they have a process that turns sand into small sapphires that just happens to make Hope sized diamonds as a side effect.

Rossi is yet another scam artist.  After more than four years of claims, and three years of supposedly delivering those trailer load MW power plants he still shivers each winter in his long coat and propane heated offices in Bologna.

Euthenasia, is a good name for you. Apt for your pseudonym. How much do you get paid to do this disinfo?

There are huge differences between Mylow and SHT. He was alone. SHT is filled with guys, the lest intelligent of which is smarter than you; and I see you as being very smart, though much of that could be from working in some kind of intel team, and it's not just you that is being represented as just you.

Yes, they have some chemistry among their 16 processes, but it isn't the sole source, and it certainly isn't a scam. You don't get that many smart people in on a scam. Usually not even one.

People should weigh your judgement ability by the fact that you buy the NIST report, which is the biggest fraud ever, which is obvious to any honest person.

My dad, David W. Allan, worked at NIST and still speaks there annually, going next month. He's a leading atomic clock physicist, and he agrees with my assessment of the NIST report on 911 being a fraud. He's good friends with Steven E. Jones. Saw him last week. Intentional community project together.
http://freeenergynews.com and http://peswiki.com
"The best cutting-edge, clean energy news and directory service on the net."