Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Dr. Stiffler's "New" Quantum Energy Reciever.

Started by synchro1, August 05, 2015, 08:20:49 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

DrStiffler

I just lost a very good post for some reason, I'll try again.

The magnets are required. The 'Reach Out and Touch Someone' holds true here. A small field is only coupled to very close or NF fields or those that are very strong.

Remember this is a Receiver as stated in the very first video. This is NOT a Generator.

WiFi, Cell, Mains etc will only be of value if they have created a magnetic field in a close mass, although the Earths Field also contributes as a Conduit for other fields. Remember above I asked, Can a Magnetic Field be Modulated and in addition when two PM's are brought close in attractive mode what happens to the strength of each magnet? Is the field density increased in each or does it remain the same?

A small field depends on stronger field to couple with it and the stronger the detector the farther it reaches out for coupling, therein is the reason for the magnets. The cap, plates, cored coil or whatever is used only to FEEL the field difference (AC) and apply it to the bridge.

The meter in the video can be powered bu both Mains and Internal D Cells. I am smart enough to know not to get caught up in this problem.

I do not intend to get back into INET rhetoric and only am offering some advice to save a lot of false direction and effort.  If I can solve some issues I will fully explain and illustrate what is going on here. If not, maybe some work by others will get it and then the cat will be out of the box by someone else.

I will jump in only if I see something totally left field or a big waste of time, hang in for a few weeks if you still do not see a direction or the whole point of it all.

Oh! Charging 3F, that is nothing with the right scale setup.
All things are possible but some are impractical.

xee2

Quote from: DrStiffler on August 11, 2015, 03:20:05 PM
when two PM's are brought close in attractive mode what happens to the strength of each magnet? Is the field density increased in each or does it remain the same?

Normal physics says they stay the same. The reason they pull harder when close is that each has more field lines going though each perpendicular surface area when close. This is a result of the fact that the field lines spread out (and thus become less dense) as the distance from magnet increases.

xee2

However, in "soft" iron the magnetic strength of the iron does increase when a magnet is brought close. This is because the magnet causes the magnetic domains in the iron to line up in one direction thus increasing the strength of the magnetic field in that direction.

Hoppy

Quote from: DrStiffler on August 11, 2015, 03:20:05 PM

The meter in the video can be powered bu both Mains and Internal D Cells. I am smart enough to know not to get caught up in this problem.


Dr. Stiffler,

Have you used a hand held battery meter with short probe / clip leads?

Void

Hi Dr. Stiffler. To conduct a more convincing demonstration, you should at the very least bring your setup out to
your back patio or back yard, or to a park or similar and use a battery powered DVM, and show that when you are at least 10 or 20 feet away
or so from any mains connected equipment and the mains power lines and wiring that you are still seeing the same cap charging rates.
With your setup right on your work bench with what appears to be various mains connected bench equipment nearby, there
is no way to tell if you are not picking up a strong EM field from some mains connected equipment or mains wiring. Normally it wouldn't
be expected that just the field from some transformers or whatever in your nearby bench equipment could cause the cap to charge up
that high and that fast without at least having a virtual or real ground or short antenna wire connection as well, but for all we know
one or more of your pieces of mains connected bench equipment may have a very strong EM field around it. As mentioned previously, it
would also be very helpful if you showed the cap charge rate with and without the magnets in place for comparison. This should demonstrate
that the magnets are an important part of the setup as you are claiming. In my own replication attempt described a few posts back, the
permanent magnets I used had no noticeable impact on the output cap charging rate at all. Using a microwave oven as a faraday shield
out in your back yard or maybe even just in the center of your living room would be very helpful as well. :)
All the best...