A Perspective On The B Type EESD - Robert Murray-Smith - Any issues?

[PIH123]

Thank you for the support.

It has nothing to do with support.
I don't know you.

But I do know, after reading your posts, that the B Type EESD is not what it portrayed to be.

This website is mostly for entertainment for me.
I arrived here when I was looking for a way to create my own circuit boards.

Good fun since then.


But I will say, that I hope when someone types "B Type EESD" into google, the first hit they get is this thread on OU.com
If they are looking into that or RMS or SunVault and read this thread, they may take pause.
And that is mostly thanks to you, but also to me and anyone else posting here recently, including JimBoot.

Same goes for the dead QEG and Waynes Zydro etc


Pete

[tinman]

Well this thread is no longer about RMS's measurement errors--it's now about who is right and who is wrong--who said what to who,and who insulted who.

So being of a neutral party,i am going to brave the waters,and put my 2 cents worth in.


MH was putting forth his disagreement toward RMS's conclusion and test method's used to compare the energy capacity per volume of weight of his EESD to that of a Li Ion battery. All was good,but then the trouble started. The following two posts were made by Jimboot (who i consider to be an FE friend-this is where the neutral party thing comes in),Jimboot is an FE friend,and MH is some one i hold great respect for.

Quote Jimboot post 4 to MH- :Are you suggesting his measurements are wrong? Or methodology erroneous?
Quote Jimboot post 13 to MH :I'd follow RMS before you MH. No offence but RMS has been very generous with his time and info over the years and always up front whilst encouraging others. Not a slight on you but rigorous support for this bloke. To cast aspersions anonymously says more about you than him. I don't about over there but over here 0.62 is not a penny stock. They are 152% up on the year so I think their investors would be very happy.


Jim-when you said-I'd follow RMS before you MH,this reads to me also that you believe RMS's measurements over that of what MH has stated. The fact is,MH is absolutely correct in every thing he has said,and so that means that i would believe in what MH has said,over that of RMS-as RMS's test made no comparison what so ever between his EESD to that of the Li Ion batteries energy capacity per weight volume-->and RMS's video was all about doing just that. As you said Jim- I think their investors would be very happy. So RMS and his company associates deliver this kind of data to there investor's,but the data is both incorrect and misleading in every way. Remember,this is other peoples money they are playing with here,so honesty and accuracy are foremost,and that video was anything but.

I reread the entire thread again before making this post,and i can say that MH held his tongue long after others started letting there's flap.

So the fact remains.
RMS's EESD seems easy to make,safe,and holds a good deal of energy for what it is,!BUT! in no way did RMS do any sort of energy storage per weight volume comparison test between his EESD and the Li Ion battery-->and that is exactly what RMS tried to portray--he tried to put forth the idea that the EESD held more energy per weight volume than that of a Li Ion battery.

So all of you that think MH is incorrect with what he has to say about RMS's test--you better think again,as he (MH) is 100% correct-->again.


Brad

[PIH123]

.
.
.
Brad

This post is one of the most important in the history of this website for anyone looking for OU.

Coming from Tinman (the most likely to achieve) who may have something and is willing to listen to arguments.

And in support of the most likely person to make those arguments.
(sorry, did I say it was not about support)


Pete

[PIH123]

And now show me what you have built or invented ?

Following the script to the letter.

First question the number of posts and why they are at an OU website in the first place.
Next comes anonymity.

Number 3, you just nailed above.

Want hints for 4 onwards ?
4. Paid industry troll
5. Lot's of swearing
6. threaten to beat him up
7. bring up unrelated stuff such as PI is not equal 3.1416

For 8 onwards, read any 400 plus page threads.

Pete

[MagnaProp]

...Tinman is in the same boat for the capacitors as far as I am concerned...

...MH is some one i hold great respect for...

Not trying to ruffle feather but the two seemingly contradictory quotes have me wondering if perhaps your trifene video was another teaching aid on how easily, people like myself, can be dupped? A simple yes or no will satisfy my curiousity.