Common batteries are free energy sources

[pg46]

Hi-

I did a few rounds with the 3 battery set up. I was using  the 1.2 volt type AA rechargables with  1750mah capacity.
According to my few tests it was soon apparent  that I was going to loose power eventually. I think that this is a good system to get more running time with using your batteries( good efficiency!) but that sooner or later you will run out of power.
I think the system using a battery and 2 capacitors has a much better chance of being successful.

Just my opinion

Best

[allcanadian]

Hello
here is an interesting question - If you are using a light bulb which radiates energy as heat-which is lost, why would you think the system could magically charge the batteries?
If however the bulb was replaced with a coil which did not radiate energy-heat-but could do work on a rotor, then maybe the work the coil did would be enough to recharge the batteries. I don't think Bedini knows what he's doing or he's not telling the full story. Energy is conservative- the fact that it happens to move through a coil of wire does not change the amount of energy moving if no energy is radiated, it shuttles from high source(24v) to low sink(12v), the amount of energy does not change so only radiated losses can reduce the systems total.

[FreeEnergy]

as they say energy can not be created nor destroyed but can only change form. so why not use its constant changing of form to run a motor? there must be a way! 

[allcanadian]

That's my guess, electrical energy to heat is a transformation I do not want. The most basic experiment you can do is to charge a capacitor through a DC motor. Count the revs on a computer fan motor on charge up of cap, when you discharge the cap through the motor without the battery connected you get the same rev's, so as far as the sum of energy is concerned the motor did not exist, so why do we assume the DC motor somehow used or destroyed energy? I have found there is only one requirement for a motor to produce work, current flow, we just assumed that we had to send it back to the source,why not just move the energy from one battery to another and not "use" it.

[FreeEnergy]

That's my guess, electrical energy to heat is a transformation I do not want. The most basic experiment you can do is to charge a capacitor through a DC motor. Count the revs on a computer fan motor on charge up of cap, when you discharge the cap through the motor without the battery connected you get the same rev's, so as far as the sum of energy is concerned the motor did not exist, so why do we assume the DC motor somehow used or destroyed energy? I have found there is only one requirement for a motor to produce work, current flow, we just assumed that we had to send it back to the source,why not just move the energy from one battery to another and not "use" it.

have you seen http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,903.0.html