The Old Standard Ignition System. Battery. Coil. Points. And Condenser....

[Magluvin]

Was going to say this earlier but was distracted..   After a week of messing with the spark coil circuits, the smell of ozone from the sparks was definitely there. But I still seem to smell it like when I go home, or at the grocery store. Does it stick to your clothes? Or have I had too much over the past week?

Mags

[Magluvin]

All I'll say here is the collectively accepted view on resonance is severely limited.....  where we want to end up, there is no value in isolating the one from the many.... 


Contemplate how to produce ozone with no spark, no arcs nor glow discharge.........

Well if your talking about more than one resonance helping to give a gain, Im seeing it in some speaker boxes. The dual chamber reflex is tuned (in my case) 25hz and 50hz and the difference in output at 25hz in that box is greater than a normal ported box of the same size only tuned to 25hz. A 4th order and especially 6th order bandpass can be tuned where both resonant freq can be brought so close that the output at that freq is just stupid loud. All using the same input level for each case.

Mags

[tinman]

what i'm saying mags is that the accepted view be it with the boxes, or electrical circuits, folk are only concerned with a single frequency....  look at nature man, please!  we observe gain as accumulation over time (what is time to nature)....  with specific emphasis on superimposition onto the fundamental... like building a seashell..... try to think of resonance in "chords" rather than single frequencies...


folk don't understand what I suggest....but they don't really try either....  write it all off if you want, but at the end of the day...  you have claims of 18 percent gain from one, whatever gains you yourself see in your endeavours, or nature's method which is the one I am chasing....  I am not intersted in 18 percent or whatever it would be when scaled up...  not the least bit curious about what you got....  Nature is in a class by itself....  thousands of generations in a single seed...show me you comprehend how it accomplishes that task, and I will follow you anywhere!

Apparently some one forgot about the big fire in the sky,which is where all of nature gets it's energy from 

[profitis]

Sucks its energy from

[Magluvin]

what i'm saying mags is that the accepted view be it with the boxes, or electrical circuits, folk are only concerned with a single frequency....  look at nature man, please!  we observe gain as accumulation over time (what is time to nature)....  with specific emphasis on superimposition onto the fundamental... like building a seashell..... try to think of resonance in "chords" rather than single frequencies...


folk don't understand what I suggest....but they don't really try either....  write it all off if you want, but at the end of the day...  you have claims of 18 percent gain from one, whatever gains you yourself see in your endeavours, or nature's method which is the one I am chasing....  I am not intersted in 18 percent or whatever it would be when scaled up...  not the least bit curious about what you got....  Nature is in a class by itself....  thousands of generations in a single seed...show me you comprehend how it accomplishes that task, and I will follow you anywhere!

Well Im on the same path of more than 1 resonance since before this thread. Ive already laid it out in the speaker thread.  And the gains Im seeing are not just 18%.  Whether the outcome yet is not overunity, from the original efficiency of the speaker itself, Im seing hundreds of percent in eff gains. There are already speakers that are 100% eff, just they are costly. So add the resonance gains to that and we are 100s of % overunity.

But you seem to be on the end of it that I wished to be a goal of mine once I figured out the circuit analogy of the speaker boxs.  But you are apparently there already.

Its all in that thread. Not making it up.

Mags