How We Should Approach And Proceed With Building Replications

[tinman]

Yes and no

There comes a time when you have to understand what effect the inventer is trying to achieve.

Take bedinis 1984 energizer for example.

Some got there knickers in a twist,just because my energizer did not look the same as the one depicted in the diagram bedini showed, but could not explain the difference between the two.

The thing that makes it worse,is the fact that that diagram also dose not depict the energizer that bedini had working on his bench.

The inventer also go's  on to say that there are many types of generators,and alternators that can be used to achieve the desired effect.

To many people seem to think that a replication must look like some picture posted by the inventer,when often the picture/diagram has nothing to do with the  actual machine the inventer actually made.

We should be replicating the effect the inventer specifies-not some picture that the inventer drew on a piece of paper.


Brad

[Floor]

Replications should be nearly identical to the original...

       In order that .....

1.  unseen and unknown....  factors which may other wise affect the replication
experiment's outcome are avoided.

2. Errors in original device / methods / processes ..... may be discovered.

3. Replication is replication,  not modification.

[Magluvin]

Replications should be nearly identical to the original...

       In order that .....

1.  unseen and unknown....  factors which may other wise affect the replication
experiment's outcome are avoided.

2. Errors in original device / methods / processes ..... may be discovered.

3. Replication is replication,  not modification.

   Thanks Floor. I agree 100% Well said.

Mags

[tinman]

so you saying you know what was the inventor trying to achieve...


what about it...


your needing someone to explain the difference between the two is a testament to your ignorance......


says you.....the debunker...



aye...indeed he did, and I imagine you busying yourself, testing as many of those methods as you can, and are still coming up short.....  where you fail is you don't know what the desired effect is...



ah...now we find the great debunker trying to justify why he builds what he wants how he sees fit...  The inventor built and tested all versions and variations of his idea, all of which led to what can be considered as the final iteration of the concept... you would be wise to remember that.



wise words from one oblivious of the effect!

And bla

[profitis]

"3. Replication is replication,  not modification."

Some blueprints have enormous scope of error and they still work just fine.all relative