LET US ALL HELP RAYMOND BUILD THIS NEW FREE ENERGY MACHINE.

[Floor]

Also as a note...

If functioning at or near unity, Ray's device is functioning in the conversion of
magnetic energy to mechanical energy more efficiently that is the input motor.

[muzzz]

Hi Guys , can someone explain to me why this is OU . Has he not just made a more efficient way of lifting the coins using inertia? .I assume both motors were the same?
Also if he used some better gear reduction on  just the motor setup and raised the same amount of coins to a certain height say 1ft and also calculated the stored potential energy of the raised weight and amount of power consumed to get to 1ft height  ,then measure how much the coins are raised each time his machine rotated and again run the machine the time it takes to have lifted the coins the same amount , then see how much power was consumed by the motor and add the used potential energy as the coins are dropped each rotation (assuming the dropping of the coins assists in its operation) .Would this not then show if it was OU .

[kajunbee]

Hi Guys , can someone explain to me why this is OU . Has he not just made a more efficient way of lifting the coins using inertia?

Ditto.

[kolbacict]

exactly. I also thought about the ratchet wheel. or manually remove the coins at the top.
And then put it down below. Or, as suggested above, divide the consumption of the motor when moving up and down.

[synchro1]

Ray's flipper is an inverse Kundel gear. Rotating Kundel's generator with an electric drill would deliver the same COP in the solinoid coil as Ray gets with his coins. Both the Kundel gear and Ray's flipper are powered in two directions.

Kundel maintains his generator is overunity. That may be true, in which case Ray's may be too! Kundel demonstrates his magnet gear power saw not drawing more amperage when a heavily forced load is placed on it.