The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[Paul-R]

Ir. Jimmy Fung is a Director of Energy Saving Solutions Limited. 

He is a Consultant to many Hong Kong Government Projects and very well respected.

He is willing to have his photo shown on the Internet with his findings.

Your findings stand if the input and output were to be steady values. If they are
pulses, then the readings may not be not reliable.

In the latter case, maybe you should start with a full battery on the input side
and a discharged battery on the output side, and after a few hours running, measure
the change in the batteries charge by measuring how much more current is needed to restore them to a predetermined standardised level. Not that easy.

[ltseung888]

Your findings stand if the input and output were to be steady values. If they are
pulses, then the readings may not be not reliable.

In the latter case, maybe you should start with a full battery on the input side
and a discharged battery on the output side, and after a few hours running, measure
the change in the batteries charge by measuring how much more current is needed to restore them to a predetermined standardised level. Not that easy.

You are right.  Our readings will be indisputable if the values were steady.   With Pulse values, the meters provide rms (root mean square) values.  There will be debate on whether a cheap meter can provide the correct rms value.  One way is to examine the waveform using the oscilloscope.  We have done that and provided such waveforms in this thread.  However, the average non-trained engineer may not be able to interpret the waveforms correctly.

The most convincing to even “the housewife type with no physics background” is to produce 5KW or some significant output.  The 225 HP Pulse Motor did that.  It then became top-secret in USA.  The Wang generator did that.  It then became top-secret in China.

Now I got word from Mr. Wang ShenHe that he may be allowed to attend the Hangzhou conference with one of his machines.  I also got some hints that a replicated? 225 HP Pulse Motor built in China may also be shown.  (If we can built the Tong Wheel with a part-time engineer, a top university in China believing in Lead-Out Energy can easily built the 225 HP Pulse Motor.) My gut feel is that the Chinese Government or at least some Senior Officials are in favor of allowing some top-secret devices to be revealed.

There are already the undisputable Lead-Out Energy Theory.  The Tong Wheel is only a small demonstration.  It is extremely easy to modify the Yu Oscillator so that a rotating rod with magnets at the tips passing magnetic actuator will demonstrate continuous rotation due to the energy gained.  We have teams reproducing the simple wheel with two tubes containing steel balls hitting soft and hard surfaces.  I shall disclose another extremely simple and easy to replicate experiment that can demonstrate overunity in a motionless device.

There is no way to suppress the Parallelogram of Forces.  There cannot be any scientific questioning of the formula of
Horizontal energy = horizontal force x horizontal displacement and
Vertical energy = vertical force x vertical displacement.
If the two above formula are correct, the Lead-Out energy theory MUST be correct.

The Hangzhou City Government can easily fund the Conference.  When the top overunity researchers like Bedini, Wang, Chao, our team etc. meet with working prototypes, the synergy will be unstoppable.  There will be undreamed of improvements.  If we have the 225 HP Pulse Motor (or even one slice of it) available for demonstration, all doubts will vaporize.

USA may elect to play the catch-up game similar to the Space Program.  Let the Russians lead the way first.  Then pour resources to catch up.  But in this overunity field, the resources required would not be that huge.  The sum is much less than building a single nuclear fission reactor.  Many Countries will be able to participate.   Ireland (via Steorn) is a contestant.  India (notified by AMURT) will participate.  An Estonian Student is learning.  Australia has many OU inventors.  Germany (via Stefan) will not be left behind.....  It should be fun.

The race to Lead-Out Energy (zero point?) is on.  Who will win???

[chrisC]

...

The race to Lead-Out Energy (zero point?) is on. 

It has already been won by the clown of the one one-man circus act!
Oh, btw, since your machine is 100% O.U, did Stephan give you the O.U prize money? I didn't see that on the O.U website. Or maybe you declined it?

cheers
chrisC

[ltseung888]

Motionless Lead-Out Energy Devices

Proof of concept experiment â€" Electron Motion energy (magnetic) can be Lead-Out via flux changes.  Use Oscilloscope to check waveform for best results.

Basic Principle (1)  the transformer:
1.   A transformer is mainly used in AC circuits
2.   A varying current in primary winding creates a varying magnetic flux in the transformer core
3.   Thus create a varying magnetic field through the secondary winding.
4.   If a load is connected to the secondary, an electric current will flow in the secondary winding
5.   Electrical energy will be transferred from the primary circuit through the transformer to the load.

Basic Principle (2)  the use of Pulsed DC instead of AC
1.   The key element is the varying current producing the varying magnetic flux.
2.   We can use Pulse DC as the varying current.
3.   If we put a magnet in the core of the transformer
a.   Pulsed DC in one direction will be enhanced
b.   Pulsed DC in the other direction will be hindered
4.   The enhanced direction Leads-Out electromagnetic energy! 
5.   This is the basic theory behind the motionless lead-out energy machine.

Basic Principle (3)  See the attached diagram

Comments

•   May need to tune
1.   Core material (try standard transformer material first)
2.   Number of Turns (start with 100 on both)
3.   Current (Half rectification of mains AC)
4.   Frequency (50 or 60 Hertz to start)
5.   Magnet (try market available, can stack)

Lawrence Tseung
Director
Help Seedlings Innovate Foundation Limited

[Paul-R]

There cannot be any scientific questioning of the formula of
Horizontal energy = horizontal force x horizontal displacement and
Vertical energy = vertical force x vertical displacement.

This is a re-writing of the familiar
Energy = MxGxH
equation, isn't it? What an unusual way of putting it. Interesting.