Single Wire Tests

[Bruce_TPU]

@ All

What I believe Marco is talking about is what BEP mentioned and I and Thaelin tested long ago, in a very different manner.

One wire. One signal, two distinct power sources.  Batteries are better.  The electrons flow with reference to only their own source and never know the other is on a passing train track. 

The ? mark is, what would be the volts and amps in such a case.  It would not be series, so what would the answer be?

What would happen if we did the same thing but turned it into a coil and used higher voltage?  That is what the next picture means.

1+1=2

I like the idea.  Someone should do the test and give the answer.   

Cheers,
Bruce

[Rosphere]

Good morning gentlemen,

I did the single wire test last night, with a few deviations:  My 9Vs were nearly dead 2Vs and my bulbs were LEDs.

Both LEDs lit-up.  The voltage reading between the red clips was zero.

Then I switched the positions of the two red clips on the test wire, as shown below, and still the LEDs lit-up.  Now what is happening in the mid-section of the test wire?

Then, I moved the red clips all the way to the opposite ends of the wire, also shown below.  The LEDs still lit-up.

Should we think of the test wire as a two way street, or a common ground of the two batteries, or both?

[Rosphere]

We assume that the two currents do not cancel each other out because we see the bulbs (LEDs) glowing, but what of the magnetic fields?

If the current is flowing both ways in the test wire, what of the magnetic fields; do we also have two opposing magnetic fields around the test wire or do they cancel each other out?

[BEP]

What would happen if we did the same thing but turned it into a coil and used higher voltage?  That is what the next picture means.

1+1=2

I like the idea.  Someone should do the test and give the answer.   

With those current directions 1+1=4, but only when they first meet. When you put in a third - where the ? is, then you may be thinking 3D. But use the KISS method. Start with one wire and one source first.

Test? No. If someone does they'll be stopping the current before it reaches the end of the wire - like Tesla did with his 'high frequency' helices.

@Rosphere

Two-way street? Maybe better as only a map or direction sign.

You measured zero volts in the middle because you had no reference point to either path.

Put a black from bat A along with a red from bat B together on one end and reverse on the other (with the loads connected).
The current from both bats is flowing the full length of the wire but opposite directions. If the wire explodes at 1.5 amps and each load is drawing 1 amp then why doesn't the wire explode? Better yet why does no current show at all in the middle?

[turbo]

the two battery experiment was just to show what i started with, and Rosphere got the same results as i did.
there is no current flowing in the middle because the circuits are not connected to each other with two wires or more.

the second experiment with the coil is more intresting.
Bruce is right about using high voltage.
in this one wire coil we can slap frequency's togheter like two transformers running slightly out of phase,or connected in reverse of one another, although it is not easy to tune the second generator reverse in sync with the first..,this means to use two seperate sources not one.
it vibrates too when the fields slap toghether, without using magnets..
i also varied the distance of the middle part of the coil, and later on i just ended with a coil with many wires on it so i could switch them.
and also i varied the metal of the coil as iron bailing wire treats the flux diffrent then copper.
then i turned the coil into a torroid etc.

these are verry simple experiments anyone can do, they only takes minutes and it's fun too. 
M.