Power ratio over one

[Bessler007]

In an orbital system rotating at a given and constant speed arcs of equal length (at equal radii) represent equal amounts of time.  From this view it's a given that time has an equivalence to distance.

The compression of the energy from arc adc into arc xby will cause an imbalance of power.  You would have the same energy happening in less time  (P = E/t).

There are several unfortunate facts of reality to consider. 

• This compression of energy (if it's diametrically opposed in time) will cause an imbalance of power causing the rotation to slow then reverse.
• If the imbalance of power isn't diametrically opposed the situation is worse. 
• You will be required to supply the energy to cause the compression.  You can't just pull energy out your arse.
• It does not matter if the system is electrical or mechanical or a combination of the two.  You can't create energy.  The energy on one side will equal that on the other unless there is some source entering into the contraption.  The contraption won't create the energy to compress the energy it produces to give you ?more power? with ?energy to spare.?  Not happening.

. . .
I haven?t even considered any means to have the apparatus self run. In my humble opinion its more important for me to prove that a power ratio over one is possible. This would be the first step. Once that is established, smart guys like you can work on the self running part.
. . .
David middleton


There is no means of this contraption to "self run" unless you are using energy from without the contraption.  Impossible.

Bessler007
mib HQ

[handyguy1]

Oh!

[erickrieg]

to mailto:Handyguy1@verizon.net,

   I am sorry you do not like my test terms.  But in my study of free energy claims, I have seen a long list of times where people make mistakes measuring input power or output power.  People like Dennis Lee and Joe Newman have been faking readings for a long time.  If I had time, I would travel around looking at all the readings-instrumentation and figuring out where they are wrong.  I just don't want to play that.  My view is someone smart enough to be the first one in a hundred years of training, that they also would be smart enough to do the much easier job of at least making a self runner.  I'm not willing to give a prize out for a self runner, but given the pathetic record of people offering "proof", I think I am willing to at least validate any real self runner.   I never understood Newman's explanation that his device would make extra electricity, but for some reason could not be made to run off that excess energy.   Just capture it in a different set of batteries and keep swapping them back and forth.
   I would much rather believe OU can be done and then help make the extra energy save our country from giving trillions to countries that hate us for black poison.

eric krieg
www.phact.org/e/freetest.html

[one]

to mailto:Handyguy1@verizon.net,

   I am sorry you do not like my test terms.  But in my study of free energy claims, I have seen a long list of times where people make mistakes measuring input power or output power.  People like Dennis Lee and Joe Newman have been faking readings for a long time.  If I had time, I would travel around looking at all the readings-instrumentation and figuring out where they are wrong.  I just don't want to play that.  My view is someone smart enough to be the first one in a hundred years of training, that they also would be smart enough to do the much easier job of at least making a self runner.  I'm not willing to give a prize out for a self runner, but given the pathetic record of people offering "proof", I think I am willing to at least validate any real self runner.   I never understood Newman's explanation that his device would make extra electricity, but for some reason could not be made to run off that excess energy.   Just capture it in a different set of batteries and keep swapping them back and forth.
   I would much rather believe OU can be done and then help make the extra energy save our country from giving trillions to countries that hate us for black poison.

eric krieg
www.phact.org/e/freetest.html

You  post  the URL   for your Free Energy Machine Test Prize Offer:

You claim that   you  want to see  free energy  become a reality


I have spent  the last  hour or 2  going  over     your compatition  rules  and  the links on that page.

My conclusion is that there is  in reality  no  chance of   anyone winning.

It is my opinion  that your   offer is only  a way to help you  discredit  any one that  has an important  breakthrough.

When I  go through the links   on the URL you gave  I found nothing but  reasons  that over unity is impossable .  ALL  given as if they  were  facts cast in stone.

There  was one link   claiming   evidence of  overunity .........but that link didn't work  .

Perhaps  I missed   some important information .

Perhaps  you  have actually  done some  experments   with overunity .

If so  please  send me  a URL of your  results.

If there are no  results .   I may call  you  Eric   but I will be thinking of you as Mr Black Poison



gary

[handyguy1]

Dear Mr. Krieg:
I?m not sure who is more stubborn, you or me! I hope you read over my post at ou_builders, viewed the photos, and checked out the You Tube videos. I would be honored if you would join in.

I am also surprised that you mention capturing the excess in a different set of batteries. That is the way to do it. I would dump the power into a cap first. That way there is no backpressure on the output coils. However, replacing one of the three 29-gauge output coils with a 21-gauge coil and diode works quite nicely charging a cell. I am also surprised that no one has asked me what my theory is. I don?t have one. I can say the excess energy is coming from the coil of wire.

Being ?smart enough? really had nothing to do with it. I simply followed the scientific principal. I find it funny when people tell me I need to learn physics and the principals of electricity. It was quite the contrary; I had to learn in excruciating detail exactly what electricity is, in order to know what I needed to change.

Quite honestly, I was waiting for the ORBO device to prove it?s self. That would have taken a lot of pressure off me! However, I am an ex-marine sergeant. Having gone through the old school at Paris Island, there is not a lot that fazes me, and I learned, the first one that resorts to name-calling loses.

Enough of my blabbering. Again, I clearly state that I am not interested in your prize money. I would be interested in you testing this device. You have mentioned contacts, perhaps they would be interested. In any event, someone is bound to replicate this simple device, if for no other reason than to prove me ?delusional!

David Middleton
handyguy1@verizon.net