Tri-Force Magnets - Finally shown to be OU?

[sm0ky2]

Hi sm0ky2
Oh I forgot to mention 3 things, 1 what I said is I feel the best way to shield placing something in front may work but I don't think its as effective.
2 when you are using magnets behind to shield its always better to have an airgap between the two magnets.
Take Care sm0ky2
Graham

i agree with that point -  having an air-gap still diverts the flux, but doesn't "link" the magnets, thus leaving the gate somewhat intact.

[sm0ky2]

@ Omni -

   what i meant by that was a magnetic wheel - operated by another magnetic set-up
spinning out of control, exploding,  and shooting magnets THROUGH my walls.

[Omnibus]

@ Omni -

   what i meant by that was a magnetic wheel - operated by another magnetic set-up
spinning out of control, exploding,  and shooting magnets THROUGH my walls.

This can always be controlled. Recall Finsrud's small brake magnets above the track. That's their role--to prevent the system going berserk.

So, that's the least of our concerns. Show me a device producing continuously excess energy and you'll be pleasantly surprised how this can be handled. Unfortunately, I don't see anything promising around. The only proven way so far is the discontinuous production of excess energy and one has to really figure out if it isn't an intrinsic situation inherent in this phenomenon. Something like the bound energy TdS, part of the enthalpy dH, which is always lost.

[sm0ky2]

@ Omni -

   what i meant by that was a magnetic wheel - operated by another magnetic set-up
spinning out of control, exploding,  and shooting magnets THROUGH my walls.

This can always be controlled. Recall Finsrud's small brake magnets above the track. That's their role--to prevent the system going berserk.

So, that's the least of our concerns. Show me a device producing continuously excess energy and you'll be pleasantly surprised how this can be handled. Unfortunately, I don't see anything promising around. The only proven way so far is the discontinuous production of excess energy and one has to really figure out if it isn't an intrinsic situation inherent in this phenomenon. Something like the bound energy TdS, part of the enthalpy dH, which is always lost.

\


you're wrong about that. little "brakes" dont work, its either Yes or No.
Acceleration or Decelleration.

you have to hit it DEAD on the mark - to get conintious rotation in that kind of set-up. which yur not going to do with a mock brack magnet hanging above. these things dont accelerate on a linear scale, its like 2x,4x,8x,16x.. and keeps on going. it can go from double digits to 4-5 digit rpm's in seconds.

[Omnibus]

@ Omni -

   what i meant by that was a magnetic wheel - operated by another magnetic set-up
spinning out of control, exploding,  and shooting magnets THROUGH my walls.

This can always be controlled. Recall Finsrud's small brake magnets above the track. That's their role--to prevent the system going berserk.

So, that's the least of our concerns. Show me a device producing continuously excess energy and you'll be pleasantly surprised how this can be handled. Unfortunately, I don't see anything promising around. The only proven way so far is the discontinuous production of excess energy and one has to really figure out if it isn't an intrinsic situation inherent in this phenomenon. Something like the bound energy TdS, part of the enthalpy dH, which is always lost.

\


you're wrong about that. little "brakes" dont work, its either Yes or No.
Acceleration or Decelleration.

you have to hit it DEAD on the mark - to get conintious rotation in that kind of set-up. which yur not going to do with a mock brack magnet hanging above. these things dont accelerate on a linear scale, its like 2x,4x,8x,16x.. and keeps on going. it can go from double digits to 4-5 digit rpm's in seconds.

Again, acceleration is a non-issue. That's desirable let alone that it can be handled without a problem. Give me that missing acceleration and just sit back and watch.