off OU topic distractions

[DeepCut]

It's only perjury if presented in a court of law.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

If you're gonna accuse the owner of the forum of collusion, I agree you're going to get banned Rosemary. He's deleting all of their stuff too, you know.

Happy you're right and I suspect that I'm out of line.  For that I apologise.  But I CANNOT understand why that thread needs DELETING.

I just cannot get there.  LOCK it.  Don't DELETE it.  Do you realise that I made public domain disclosures on our magnets that will now be lost?  Quite apart from the work itself?  And the thesis?  And my readership was NOT small.  On the contrary.

Anyway.
Rosemary

added BTW  -  What work of their's is he deleting?  By their work I presume you mean Glen's work and Glen has NEVER posted his work here.  He's posted links that - on the old thread related to deleted files - and on my thread work that relates to denial of the technology.  Nothing suits them better than to remove all reference.  Golly.  I thought you at least understood that much.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Howdy reading Members and Guests,

Does anyone know the meaning of the word "perjury" ??   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perjury

What we have here is a "SWORN" legal affidavit to Scribd from "Rosemary Ainslie" on a Copyright dispute of a document ( Scribd )  doc/26240411

http://cid-6b7817c40bb20460.office.live.com/self.aspx/.Public/Mosfet%20Heater/Legal%20-%20Notes/Scribd/Ainslie^_Affidavit^_Scribd.pdf   (verifiable)


We have a Tektronix e-mail about the equipment used in the "Open Source" testing and evaluation events -

http://cid-6b7817c40bb20460.office.live.com/self.aspx/.Public/Mosfet%20Heater/Legal%20-%20Notes/Tektronix/Request^_for^_return^_due^_to^_misleading^_intent.pdf   (verifiable)


We have documents (doc/26240411) taken down by IEEE on Scribd with the note displayed "This content was removed at the request of IEEE" up loaded by aetherevarising  ( aka Rosemary Ainslie )

http://www.scribd.com/doc/26240411/PROVING-OVER-UNITY-THE-HARD-WORK-OF-MANY-DEDICATED-OPEN-SOURCE-MEMBERS
http://www.scribd.com/doc/26240411/100130-071433-GLEN-01-Final-Draft

***************************************************************************************************
 


What IEEE does with the "SWORN" legal affidavit of Rosemary Ainslie is their business with Scribd.

What Tektronix does with the "SWORN" legal affidavit of Rosemary Ainslie is their business with Scribd.

What Scribd does with the "SWORN" legal affidavit of Rosemary Ainslie is their business.

But being my name is on the  "SWORN" legal affidavit of Rosemary Ainslie it's my business also with the unfounded unproven allegations and possible slander ....... and I do know what the meaning of "perjury" is .....


Regards,
Glen

More to the point - do you understand the meaning of the word DEFAMATION?  I am absolutely NOT GUILTY OF PERJURY.  To be guilty you will need to prove that I am precluded from publishing the submitted paper to the TIE - IEEE.   Perjury would require that I CLAIMED THAT IT WAS PUBLISHED.  I go to some considerable efforts both publicly here and in an explanation of the publication on SCRIBD to assure EVERYONE THAT THE PAPER HAS NOT BEEN PUBLISHED.  I rely on this.  It gives the cause enormous POLITICAL CAPITAL.  HOWEVER.  Now that Scribd have removed the paper PENDING AN INVESTIGATION - and as HARTI is about to remove my thread - there will be ABSOLUTELY NO EVIDENCE OF THIS.  Again.  To those of you who care enough.  Please make copies of that thread that is about to be deleted.

@Glen.  You need to remind us all how you stated on my thread - that thread that is about to be deleted - that 'everyone knows that you have sole copyright'.  There are seven authors.  ANY ONE OF THOSE SEVEN AUTHORS ARE LEGALLY ENTITLED TO PUBLISH THAT PAPER ANYWHERE THEY DEEM FIT. IN THE EVEN THAT THEY RECEIVE ROYALTIES FOR THIS THEN THAT MUST BE SHARED BETWEEN ALL THE COLLABORATORS.  You do NOT have sole copyright.  And if you try and register sole copyright then you will have PERJURED YOURSELF.  That is the meaning of perjury GLEN and I strongly propose you get familiar with the term.

Also.  You PERJURED YOURSELF previously when you wrote to Scribd to advise them that you REPRESENTED THE SOLE COPYRIGHT OWNER.  Then too they withdrew the paper - PENDING AND INVESTIGATION.  And may I remind both you and all the readers here that the result of that investigation was the RE-INSTATEMENT OF THAT PAPER.  I am ENTIRELY SATISFIED that this will be done again.  I have NOT INFRINGED ANYONE'S COPYRIGHT NOR WRONGFULLY MISREPRESENTED THE STATUS OF THE PAPER.  ON THE CONTRARY.

And I believe I either have you or Harvey or both of you to thank for this latest intervention - ALL DONE in a desperate attempt to lose me any voice at all.

Rosemary


Edited spelling

[happyfunball]

Happy you're right and I suspect that I'm out of line.  For that I apologise.  But I CANNOT understand why that thread needs DELETING.

I just cannot get there.  LOCK it.  Don't DELETE it.  Do you realise that I made public domain disclosures on our magnets that will now be lost?  Quite apart from the work itself?  And the thesis?  And my readership was NOT small.  On the contrary.

Anyway.
Rosemary

added BTW  -  What work of their's is he deleting?  By their work I presume you mean Glen's work and Glen has NEVER posted his work here.  He's posted links that - on the old thread related to deleted files - and on my thread work that relates to denial of the technology.  Nothing suits them better than to remove all reference.  Golly.  I thought you at least understood that much.

He's deleting their endless flaming. My personal advice is, ignore them, no one cares what they post except themselves. They've convinced no one of anything and you've defended yourself enough. 

[Rosemary Ainslie]

He's deleting their endless flaming. My personal advice is, ignore them, no one cares what they post except themselves. They've convinced no one of anything and you've defended yourself enough.

I wish that this was true.  He's actually deleting something in the order of 3 if not 4 entire threads.  And the one of them has work that was intended for public domain disclosure - as is all my work.  And if you look at the word count involved - it's the size of one or two good sized tomes.  Now to be relegated to a tomb stone.  More's the pity.

Rosemary