off OU topic distractions

[Rosemary Ainslie]

ANOTHER OPEN LETTER TO HARTIBERLIN

PLEASE DO NOT DELETE MY OWN THREAD.  JUST LOCK IT.  ELSE WE WILL ALL LOSE ACCESS TO INFORMATION ON THAT THREAD THAT WAS INTENDED TO BE PUT INTO THE PUBLIC DOMAIN - IN GOOD FAITH - AND FOR PERMANENT RECORD.  THIS RELATES NOT ONLY TO THE WORK ON THE THESIS - BUT TO THE APPLICATION OF THAT WORK ON THE CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF A MAGNETIC MONOPOLE.  ELSE THERE WILL BE NO DUE AND PROPER RECORD.  AND THAT WORK WILL BE LOST WHICH WILL ENABLE THE OUTRIGHT THEFT OF THAT TECHNOLOGY AND THAT THESIS.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

[Mk1]

@rosemary

Hi , good luck ...

I would like to say that your tread if deleted will be because of the behavior of the people in it more then the content , this is you invention , the responsible thing is to save all your info your self .

You are not banned , and could re post your info .

Some times we are responsible for our success , i have seen tread titles of your that were invitation for overflow of criticism , think 20 time before editing any comment , it always cast doubt about real intent because something is missing , and because someone got cut off , it is a NO NO.

You want people to work with you , you need to disclose everything down to wire gauge , part number , trade secret ,everything , otherwise you are not at the right place , plus it only leads to more problems people can't replicate doubt sets in not good , plus its a question of respect , i see that you spend time arguing , that time should be spent on explaining and showing .

Frankly , i never even bothered looking into your tread because there too much thing surrounding it .

It you really do this for the benefit of everyone then you don't need your name associated with it , knowing you made a difference is enough , Using your full name for user id , show some search of recognition that smells like a Ego , people do like that...

Those are my suggestion , good luck ...

Mark     

[Rosemary Ainslie]

@rosemary

Hi , good luck ...

I would like to say that your tread if deleted will be because of the behavior of the people in it more then the content , this is you invention , the responsible thing is to save all your info your self .

You are not banned , and could re post your info .

Some times we are responsible for our success , i have seen tread titles of your that were invitation for overflow of criticism , think 20 time before editing any comment , it always cast doubt about real intent because something is missing , and because someone got cut off , it is a NO NO.

You want people to work with you , you need to disclose everything down to wire gauge , part number , trade secret ,everything , otherwise you are not at the right place , plus it only leads to more problems people can't replicate doubt sets in not good , plus its a question of respect , i see that you spend time arguing , that time should be spent on explaining and showing .

Frankly , i never even bothered looking into your tread because there too much thing surrounding it .

It you really do this for the benefit of everyone then you don't need your name associated with it , knowing you made a difference is enough , Using your full name for user id , show some search of recognition that smells like a Ego , people do like that...

Those are my suggestion , good luck ...

Mark     

Mark, Thank you for your honesty.  I realise you share this opinion with many others.  I have a very strong readership here - but it is certainly NOT amongst its members or, in any event, its more active members. 

Regarding the naming of the threads.  I have absolutely NEVER started a thread here at OU.com.  I would not know how to.  I do not have the internet skills.  You will notice that the first thread was started by TK - the second thread was put up by Harti.  I assumed that to counter the first - need my name in the second.  I recommended that it include my name.  It was not intended to promote myself.  THEN.  The third thread 'Bash Rosemary Ainslie here' - was intended as somewhere for Glen et al to post their crap - because my own thread was being systematically wrecked.  And I did not want to lose its readership - which was happening fast.  Then the fourth thread was started by Glen et al.  That thread had a burgeoning readership for precisely one day and all interest then died.  Since they couldn't manage to whip up the required interest on their own thread they then flamed mine precisely when I could do nothing about it as I was ill in hospital.  My son, B4free and Wilby tried to 'stop the rot' during my absense.  But it didn't work.  They're objects were managed.  Very capabably.

So.  I have never technically started any threads here at all.  And I do not know where I got the authority to monitor 2 of them.  In fact I never realised that I had this authority.  My own was required to stop the flaming - which I should have done.  As it was I allowed way too much freedom of expression.  The irony is that their complaint to Harti is that I deleted their posts.  LOL

Regarding the 'editing of comments' - I have deleted less than 0.2% of all that has been lodged against me.  Let me recap.  I deleted a post that had an x rated link.  I deleted a post from Shruggedatlas by accident.  I deleted 2 - I think it was - of Truthbeknowns' posts as they were faithfully being copied on another thread by herself.  Glen wrote to Harti to advise him that I had deleted 8 of his posts.  SIMPLY NOT TRUE.  It's in the same vein as saying - I 'slander' him or that I've perjured myself.  All allegations.  Not  shred of truth.  And those tedious links that he supplies as some kind of endorsement of his allegations?  They very seldom have any relevance at all.

And regarding the FULL DISCLOSURE OF THE TECHNOLOGY.  I cannot do more than my best.  I have FULLY DISCLOSED ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING THAT I CAN TO THE VERY BEST OF MY ABILITY.  It is the effeciency of this anti Anslie campaign that leaves you with the impression that anything is being held back.  My God.  They're good at what they do.

What I freely admit is that I have had second thoughts about SHARING the work that the students are doing.  This because it is their own work and I am truly afraid that Glen or Harvey will copy this work and claim it as their own.  I have that on record where this seems to be their intention.The students themselves will require that recognition.  It's now their project.  But while I may not disclose the test parameters I have EVERY INTENTION of showing those COP results.  And photographing or filming it as required.  And I assure you that NONE OF THAT WORK IS PATENTABLE.  It is just seminal research.

And had I been allowed to simply buckle down and share - as is my wont - then trust me, you'd be struggling for air.  They have, indeed, managed to prevent me sharing both by forcing me to fight my corner and by taking up huge chapters of my time.

Rosemary

[Mk1]

@rosemary

Ok to save text , you high light the text with the mouse holding the left click , once it is highlighted , right click and select the copy option .

You will need to save info some where , you can use notepad or word , just go to edit in the software and click paste .

To save picture , right click select save picture , you may want to create a folder for it .


Starting a tread is as easy as making a post , you got to be in power but never delete or get in extensive argument , it just drains energy for no good reason .

[wattsup]

I put all the pages of the closed thread are now here;
http://purco.qc.ca/ftp/Overunity.com%20-%20Forum%20members/rosemarie-ainslie/

Someone can always rework the pages into a pdf file.

@stefan

As for deleting @RA's thread, @stefan please reconsider because the impact will be great. If you do that, then I and many others will never post a discovery on this forum because we could not trust you anymore. I could be Rosemary, like any other member here could be, and, none of us would want that kind of treatment. Any Joe Blow can come here and start massacring a thread then it results in the thread being deleted. Members will always have to be on guard, never knowing if the thread will be there from one week to the next. That's not a good way to run a forum. Besides, the thread will fall into its archival purpose like all other threads eventually do. So what's the big deal to delete it?. Just leave it closed but leave it there.

Then I suggest you ban @fuzzytomcat for having caused so much hassle. The guy has some lose parts in his brains and he has dishonored the OU community with his lower then low tactics. I am just totally insulted by his actions against Rosemary. Just get rid of him fast.