off OU topic distractions

[Rosemary Ainslie]

  THE FILE IS A PDF OF THE PAPER THAT WAS SUBMITTED TO TIE JOURNAL AND THE PREPRINT IS PROOF OF THAT SUBMISSION.  THE THEME OF THE SCRIBD PUBLICATION IS ITS OUTRIGHT - PRE REVIEW - REJECTION.  IT IS REFERENCED EVERYWHERE.   

LOL  I've spent the last half hour trying to understand your complaint.  Seems like a made a typo.  I do this often.  Usually I pick it up. 

Your problem Glen is that you assume that everyone here is a fool.  The readership on OU.COM is absolutely nothing like the readership at EF.Com.  Far more discerning.  You'll need to up the ante.  And trying to capitalise on clear typos is not going to convince anyone.  Especially when they're mine.  I'm half blind remember.

ADDED.  BTW.  Nice HIGHLIGHTING.  It's a comfort that the point has now been made over and over...and over.  Thank you for that.

[tak22]

hmm ... another mugged topic, taken over by the Magic Heater crowd.

it's laughable, ironic, sad, pathetic, amusing, and on and on and on ...

get back on topic or go away. it's that simple.

tak

[Rosemary Ainslie]

hmm ... another mugged topic, taken over by the Magic Heater crowd.

it's laughable, ironic, sad, pathetic, amusing, and on and on and on ...

get back on topic or go away. it's that simple.

tak

Hello tak - if the subject were that trivial I would agree with you.  This 'magic heater system' that you dismiss so readily is in need of all the attention it can get.  And I'm not sure why it's off topic.  This thead topic is 'off OU topic distractions'.  It's got everything to do with being forced off topic by a barrage of distractions.  And nor is it necessary to tell me with so little decency and good manners to 'go away'.  As it I'm being forced away together with that 'magic heating system'.  More's the pity.  My concern in any event is that it's magic does not disappear into the clutches of interested parties.  I would have thought our OU community would be rather more concerned than otherwise.  With respect.  After all I am not a beneficiary.  I am only trying to advance a technology.  And I do it on a full-time basis - my health or wealth - or lack thereof - notwithstanding.  Do you?

Rosemary

[DeepCut]

This is a Free Energy forum, not a Wasted Energy forum.

Rosie i suggest you ignore people criticising you.

Don't even reply to this just ignore the crap.


Best Wishes, Gary.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

ANOTHER OPEN LETTER TO HARTIBERLIN

PLEASE DO NOT DELETE MY OWN THREAD.  JUST LOCK IT.  ELSE WE WILL ALL LOSE ACCESS TO INFORMATION ON THAT THREAD THAT WAS INTENDED TO BE PUT INTO THE PUBLIC DOMAIN - IN GOOD FAITH - AND FOR PERMANENT RECORD.  THIS RELATES NOT ONLY TO THE WORK ON THE THESIS - BUT TO THE APPLICATION OF THAT WORK ON THE CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF A MAGNETIC MONOPOLE.  ELSE THERE WILL BE NO DUE AND PROPER RECORD.  AND THAT WORK WILL BE LOST WHICH WILL ENABLE THE OUTRIGHT THEFT OF THAT TECHNOLOGY AND THAT THESIS.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

In case you missed this open letter.  Please read this Harti.  I think you are making an enormous error in deleting when locking would more than serve your purposes.

Kind regards,
Rosemary

BTW Read those posts on that very short thread.  Please.  I don't think it will take that much of your time and it is my defense.  Thus far I do not understand why you need to delete.  Just LOCK.  For pity's sake.

Guys,  I have messaged Harti, yet again.  I am not defending the mismanagement of that thread.  I am simply asking that he don't delete it.  If any of you feel strongly enough about this perhaps you could add to my request here in a pm to him.  Thank you.

regards,
Rosemary