off OU topic distractions

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Thanks Mark.  But I'm not about to start another thread here.  Interesting point though. Does one automatically have the right to monitor one's thread?  I never knew that.

I need a forum where there's little or no interst so that I can make due record.  That's all that's required.  But I believe there are those members who have already attended to this.  So it's happening. 

My intention from here on is to simply develop my own blog.  That way no-one gets to interrupt the theme. 

You went to a lot of trouble there.  Thanks for that.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

[Rosemary Ainslie]

I put all the pages of the closed thread are now here;
http://purco.qc.ca/ftp/Overunity.com%20-%20Forum%20members/rosemarie-ainslie/

Someone can always rework the pages into a pdf file.

@stefan

As for deleting @RA's thread, @stefan please reconsider because the impact will be great. If you do that, then I and many others will never post a discovery on this forum because we could not trust you anymore. I could be Rosemary, like any other member here could be, and, none of us would want that kind of treatment. Any Joe Blow can come here and start massacring a thread then it results in the thread being deleted. Members will always have to be on guard, never knowing if the thread will be there from one week to the next. That's not a good way to run a forum. Besides, the thread will fall into its archival purpose like all other threads eventually do. So what's the big deal to delete it?. Just leave it closed but leave it there.

Then I suggest you ban @fuzzytomcat for having caused so much hassle. The guy has some lose parts in his brains and he has dishonored the OU community with his lower then low tactics. I am just totally insulted by his actions against Rosemary. Just get rid of him fast.

wattsup - you're a honey.  I'm afraid I'm not sure about those files of yours because I can't open them.  But Wilby is making good use of it.  Many thanks indeed.  And possibly there's another forum where they can also go.  So it's looking promising.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

[fuzzytomcat]

More to the point - do you understand the meaning of the word DEFAMATION?  I am absolutely NOT GUILTY OF PERJURY.  To be guilty you will need to prove that I am precluded from publishing the submitted paper to the TIE - IEEE.   Perjury would require that I CLAIMED THAT IT WAS PUBLISHED.  I go to some considerable efforts both publicly here and in an explanation of the publication on SCRIBD to assure EVERYONE THAT THE PAPER HAS NOT BEEN PUBLISHED. I rely on this.  It gives the cause enormous POLITICAL CAPITAL.  HOWEVER.  Now that Scribd have removed the paper PENDING AN INVESTIGATION - and as HARTI is about to remove my thread - there will be ABSOLUTELY NO EVIDENCE OF THIS.  Again.  To those of you who care enough.  Please make copies of that thread that is about to be deleted.

@Glen.  You need to remind us all how you stated on my thread - that thread that is about to be deleted - that 'everyone knows that you have sole copyright'.  There are seven authors.  ANY ONE OF THOSE SEVEN AUTHORS ARE LEGALLY ENTITLED TO PUBLISH THAT PAPER ANYWHERE THEY DEEM FIT. IN THE EVEN THAT THEY RECEIVE ROYALTIES FOR THIS THEN THAT MUST BE SHARED BETWEEN ALL THE COLLABORATORS.  You do NOT have sole copyright.  And if you try and register sole copyright then you will have PERJURED YOURSELF.  That is the meaning of perjury GLEN and I strongly propose you get familiar with the term.

Also.  You PERJURED YOURSELF previously when you wrote to Scribd to advise them that you REPRESENTED THE SOLE COPYRIGHT OWNER.  Then too they withdrew the paper - PENDING AND INVESTIGATION.  And may I remind both you and all the readers here that the result of that investigation was the RE-INSTATEMENT OF THAT PAPER.  I am ENTIRELY SATISFIED that this will be done again.  I have NOT INFRINGED ANYONE'S COPYRIGHT NOR WRONGFULLY MISREPRESENTED THE STATUS OF THE PAPER.  ON THE CONTRARY.

And I believe I either have you or Harvey or both of you to thank for this latest intervention - ALL DONE in a desperate attempt to lose me any voice at all.

Rosemary


Edited spelling

Quote - By Rosemary Ainslie
I go to some considerable efforts both publicly here and in an explanation of the publication on SCRIBD to assure EVERYONE THAT THE PAPER HAS NOT BEEN PUBLISHED.


Then "EXACTLY" what is this IEEE authorized "Pre Print" document with all seven authors names on it ? published by FuzzyTomCat ??

http://www.scribd.com/doc/23455916/Open-Source-Evaluation-of-Power-Transients-Generated-to-Improve-Performance-Coefficient-of-Resistive-Heating-Systems




.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Quote - By Rosemary Ainslie
I go to some considerable efforts both publicly here and in an explanation of the publication on SCRIBD to assure EVERYONE THAT THE PAPER HAS NOT BEEN PUBLISHED.


Then "EXACTLY" what is this IEEE authorized "Pre Print" document with all seven authors names on it ? published by FuzzyTomCat ??

THE FILE IS A PDF OF THE PAPER THAT WAS SUBMITTED TO TIE JOURNAL AND THE PREPRINT IS PROOF OF THAT SUBMISSION.  THE THEME OF THE SCRIBD PUBLICATION IS ITS OUTRIGHT - PRE REVIEW - REJECTION.  IT IS REFERENCED EVERYWHERE.   

http://www.scribd.com/doc/23455916/Open-Source-Evaluation-of-Power-Transients-Generated-to-Improve-Performance-Coefficient-of-Resistive-Heating-Systems




.

THE FILE IS A PDF OF THE PAPER THAT WAS SUBMITTED TO TIE JOURNAL AND THE PREPRINT IS PROOF OF THAT SUBMISSION.  THE THEME OF THE SCRIBD PUBLICATION IS ITS OUTRIGHT - PRE REVIEW - REJECTION.  IT IS REFERENCED IN THE COMMENTS AND THROUGHOUT 2 THREADS BOTH HERE AND AT ENERGETIC FORUM.  Without that reference of submission there is NO PROOF OF HAVING SUBMITTED IT.

Rosemary

ADDED.  NOT ONLY WAS THIS PUBLISHED BUT WAS PUBLISHED AT ENERGETIC FORUM - BY MYSELF - WAS THE LETTER THAT PROPOSED THAT WE SUBMIT THE PAPER DIRECTLY TO A PHYSICS JOURNAL.  THAT IS WHAT YOU AND HARVEY SCUPPERED.  I HAVE NEVER NEVER NEVER CLAIMED IMPLIED PRETENDED HINTED OR INTENDED TO ADVISE OUR PUBLIC THAT THE PAPER WAS ACCEPTED.  I GO OUT OF MY WAY TO ASSURE ALL READERS THAT IT WAS REJECTED PRIOR TO REVIEW.

And guys, just a point here.  The paper, there were two submissions of two different papers - never even made it to review.  This means that they could not fault the conclusions.  Else they would simply have rejected it out of hand which would have meant that we could never re-submit it.

That's the good news that Harvey, Glen et al - are anxious that you do not realise.

Regards
Rosemary

[fuzzytomcat]

Quote - By Rosemary Ainslie
I go to some considerable efforts both publicly here and in an explanation of the publication on SCRIBD to assure EVERYONE THAT THE PAPER HAS NOT BEEN PUBLISHED.


Then "EXACTLY" what is this IEEE authorized "Pre Print" document with all seven authors names on it ? published by FuzzyTomCat ??

http://www.scribd.com/doc/23455916/Open-Source-Evaluation-of-Power-Transients-Generated-to-Improve-Performance-Coefficient-of-Resistive-Heating-Systems




.

Quote from: fuzzytomcat on Today at 03:48:40 AM

    Quote - By Rosemary Ainslie
    I go to some considerable efforts both publicly here and in an explanation of the publication on SCRIBD to assure EVERYONE THAT THE PAPER HAS NOT BEEN PUBLISHED.


    Then "EXACTLY" what is this IEEE authorized "Pre Print" document with all seven authors names on it ? published by FuzzyTomCat ??

    THE FILE IS A PDF OF THE PAPER THAT WAS SUBMITTED TO TIE JOURNAL AND THE PREPRINT IS PROOF OF THAT SUBMISSION.  THE THEME OF THE SCRIBD PUBLICATION IS ITS OUTRIGHT - PRE REVIEW - REJECTION.  IT IS REFERENCED EVERYWHERE.   

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/23455916/Open-Source-Evaluation-of-Power-Transients-Generated-to-Improve-Performance-Coefficient-of-Resistive-Heating-Systems



     
    .

  THE FILE IS A PDF OF THE PAPER THAT WAS SUBMITTED TO TIE JOURNAL AND THE PREPRINT IS PROOF OF THAT SUBMISSION.  THE THEME OF THE SCRIBD PUBLICATION IS ITS OUTRIGHT - PRE REVIEW - REJECTION.  IT IS REFERENCED EVERYWHERE.   




@ Rosemary you modified and added this to my Quote ......is there no end to how far you will go ...